semi-pro waster said:
Are we thinking of the same machine? Yeah pretty much any game you could get on the Amiga was available on the ST also, the sound chip was used by a lot of musicians, in fact the ST kicked off a lot of home recording because of the fact that it had a midi port. I have not a clue about any design flaws in the graphics chip on the ST or otherwise, in fact but for the fact that my floppy drive died I'd probably still be playing it.
This is what I mean about Amiga owners being the enemy, propoganda all the way
No way, no way EVER where all the games released on the Amiga released on the ST!!! EVER!!
Yes, the Atari ST. Exactly the samy Yamaha chip as the Amstrad. The sound chip WASNT used by musicians, but the built in MIDI port was, and so were the attached Synths and Modules.... Beleive me, no-one in their right mind would use the sound chip on the ST.... It had three channels, one left, one right, and one middle. Compare that against the 4 channel stereo of the Amiga, with the ability to play 8-bit samples indepent of the CPU.... And you start to get the picture.
The graphics chip on the ST was desgined to equal the chip on the Amiga. However on production there was a design flaw found in the chip, and they all had to be downgraded. Hence the reason you have a border, and only 512 colours instead of 4096....
Either way the ST became specialized for musicians because of the MIDI port. Everything else went the Amiga's way (Including Video editing...). Not propoganda, all based on facts...
Oh, BTW I initially bought an ST for £300 just when they came out. Then there was a memory shortage and Atari had to put their price up to £400, just as Commodore released the Amiga 500 and reduced the price to £400.
So I sold my ST for £380... (it had a couple of games), and bought an Amiga...
I remember opening up the ST and scratching "peice of ****" on the metal casing...... I wonder if anyone ever read that.