Were superhuman didnt you know....
oh so that explains the brightly coloured jump suits

Were superhuman didnt you know....

I think Pie's post was a perfect example of the problem with a lot of bikers - they make excuses for dangerous driving.
Reckless overtaking could be around a blind corner or over a blind crest, which can put the rider and traffic around them in danger.
There shouldnt ever be an excuse for speeding, even if you dont agree with it - we all have to abide by the same rules, just because you physically CAN go faster, doesnt mean you should. I've seen bikers doing 50~60 on city roads, hitting a pedestrian at that speed would be catastrophic.
Weaving to avoid potholes is fine, swerving around traffic to pass them on the nearside, then offside isnt.
Tailgating is NEVER acceptable, you dont know what the vehicle(s) in front are going to do. My prefered method for overtaking in the car is to sit further back than normal in a slightly more offside position than normal. That gives a good clear view of the road ahead and lets you build speed in your own lane before passing. Bikes generally have much better accelleration, so there's no reason this shouldnt work too.
Its fairly irrelevant if someone has ridden a bike or not when one drives into the side of your car

oh so that explains the brightly coloured jump suits![]()
Think Hulk in leather 
iaind, the more this debate goes on, the more you appear to have a problem with bikers.
At the moment, all bikers ride at 80mph 2ft behind the car in front.
oh so that explains the brightly coloured jump suits![]()
iaind, the more this debate goes on, the more you appear to have a problem with bikers.
At the moment, all bikers ride at 80mph 2ft behind the car in front.
I'm just trying to say that your (and others) perspective of a motorcyclists behaviour is both prejudiced and uninformed, so when you judge a riders behaviour as being dangerous it is not neccesarily so. I am not condoning dangerous riding just questioning whether you are in a position to make a judgement on what is or is not dangerous given your position as a non rider and someone who is biased against bikers. Perhaps you might be right 50% of the time, the other 50% you're probably not in a position to be able to asses the road and traffic conditions that the rider has to contend with, neither do you know the ability of the rider or his machine. We could probably agree that 25% of bikers let the side down and are in need of training and education, but I bet the ratio of bikers seeking advanced tuition exceeds that of car drivers .....
Edit: Your estimation of 25% of bikers letting the side down actually reinforces my original point. If I had to guess, that's probably about right around here, probably higher in the summer by the coast. If I had to put a figure on the number of cars I see being badly driven, it's probably 5~10%.
I do lifesavers when walking around in town etc, nevermind in the car!![]()

, though unsure if it will stand up in courtEdit to clarify: Just as I don't know how dangerous the bikers you have seen are, you do not know how dangerous the rest of the biker population are. See my point?
bikers are acutely aware that if they ride like **** they stand a real chance of becoming a tarmac burger. car drivers do not; you would not expect to die crashing at 40mph in a car. Youre lucky to survive bike crashes.
