I am. So perhaps you have a point. I'm not indiscrimantly lumping them in though. To be clear, I DID distinguish between problems caused by the Left in general and those caused by specifically the militant Left / Antifa. I referred to both in my post but if you'll look you'll see I categorised them separately. I do concede that I see a lot of overlap and connection between the two groups though. And you may observe that many White Supremacists and Nazis support some of the more mainstream politicans and policies on the Right. (Although they always think they don't go far enough). The differences I'll draw though are as follows:
- The Right routinely condemns groups like White Supremacists and Nazis. The Left tacitly supports its more militant wings.
- Both media and academia routinely condemn groups like White Supremacists and Nazis. Both routinely turn a blind eye or even support militant left wingers. Had Nazis done to Hamburg what Black Block anti-capitalists did to it, there would have been endless coverage and criticism.
- White Supremacists and Nazis are not generally actually Right Wing. Antifa usually are genuinely communist or socialist. You will try to reject this as a double standard but I have had some fairly extensive conversations with groups of antifa and anarchists (almost always anarcho-communist) and generally they have at least a basic understanding of their political ideology and social politics, sometimes pretty deep. Your average Nazi can barely spell their political ideology. For this reason and the above two, there's a much smoother gradiation as you move from Left Wing militancy to mainstream Left Wing politics than there is with Right Wing where there is a sharp break. As I say, W/S and Nazis are kind of their own special and repugnant block. They might wave the odd Trump banner or Confederate Flag, but they're actually pretty isolated.
- Numbers. The number of militant Left dwarfs the number of W/S and Nazis. By several multiples. That makes one much scarier than the other even before you factor in media and academic acceptance as above.
- Left Wing militants focus a lot on shutting down dialogue. Whereas the W/S and Nazis are fighting for a voice. I don't want to listen to Nazi rubbish but their struggle to get attention is a lot less threatening to me than the Militant Left's determination to shut down speech that they disagree with. The one is a minor threat, the other a fundamental attack on our freedoms.
So that's not a rigorous analysis - it's late and I was just having a skim through the thread out of interest and saw my name. However, I think that's a good if not comprehensive reply. I "lumped" in generic Left wing with militant Left Wing more so than I do its counterparts, because, primarily, I see more acceptance of militancy on the Left. There could be a bias at play - I do, after all, self-identify as Right Wing. However, reviewing the above I think everything in it is supportable and accords with my actual experiences.