
Indeed, going by that logic, FF was a rip of Dragon Quest.Mirage said:I can not wait..I loved the demo, I don't think it really plays like FF too much, it's the fact that it's a turn based RPG that make people think it's a rip! There are other turn based RPGS you know!
Psyk said:Indeed, going by that logic, FF was a rip of Dragon Quest.

Topcat said:Well it got 9/10 in the Official Xbox 360 Magazine and one thing they did like was the sound/music so I think you should be OK there.
I never trust Edge reviews too much, they've marked many games I love low, I think they base too much on Innovation where sometimes they should just accept a good game.
Now a question :
Anyone know the approx playtime for the game, I'm guessing 40+ hours ?

Psyk said:Indeed, going by that logic, FF was a rip of Dragon Quest.
Yeah I agree, generally speaking FF is a bit better. But Dragon Quest came first, and heavily influenced the first FF game.Surfer said:played both FF and Dragon Quest on PS2
i thought Dragon Quest was very boring. Big cutesy colourful graphics and super simplistic interface and environment. (imo aimed at the under 10 year old age market)
Wandering round the big open landscape was a a bit boring as well because there are way too many random battles and nothing in the landscapes except the occasional chest aaarghhh.
The battle scenes are alright but i could not stand the music.
All in all FF seemed more mature and had more going for it. Story wise they were both pretty good.
Surfer said:edit: Blue Dragon coming to PS3?