BMW and M Power Owners

Re: M2... They still haven't made the exhaust sound as mean as the car actually looks :(

You look at it and think "That's going to sound so amazing", but then it pulls away and it sounds muffled and not what you'd expect. The stock M4 is exactly the same :( Why not just put the higher spec sports exhaust on by default?
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;29383753 said:
Sigh, it's really sad to see this sort of irrational crap happening in the car market again and again and again. It shouldn't cost more than a new M4.

Indeed, lovely though it is, it starts looking really expensive when it's costing more than an M3/M4.

It's annoying that all the reviews coming out are saying how great it is at just £43k, when it's anything but £43k in reality, and I think delivery times are well into 2018 now.

Very nice colour though.

neG9DFo.jpg
 
Indeed, lovely though it is, it starts looking really expensive when it's costing more than an M3/M4.

It's annoying that all the reviews coming out are saying how great it is at just £43k, when it's anything but £43k in reality, and I think delivery times are well into 2018 now.

Very nice colour though.

http://i.imgur.com/neG9DFo.jpg[/IMG[/QUOTE]

They've got the looks spot on. It looks great.

I was speccing one up on the car configurator a couple of weeks ago and the equipment list as standard is...sparse. It's £47k with just the DCT. From what I can see, you can't have anything other than black leather either, and the range of interior trims is non existent.

When you add on all the things that you expect to be on a car like that, it gets prettayyy expensive.
 
I really don't think a standard specification for a small coupe which includes leather, Xenon's and Professional Media Package can be described as 'sparse' IMHO.

Infact everything on the options list bar SMG looks like a 'nice to have' rather than an 'essential'.
 
CT's review of the M2, his review gave more driver's information I feel and was rather more enjoyable/entertaining.

 
[TW]Fox;29384002 said:
I really don't think a standard specification for a small coupe which includes leather, Xenon's and Professional Media Package can be described as 'sparse' IMHO.

Infact everything on the options list bar SMG looks like a 'nice to have' rather than an 'essential'.

Agreed. Honestly the only things I'd add would be upgraded audio, adaptive lights and folding mirrors (I think heated seats are standard on the M2? If not I'd add them too). Still, with the DCT box when I spec'd one up it came to £51k OTR, and that's firmly in M3/M4 territory.
 
[TW]Fox;29384002 said:
I really don't think a standard specification for a small coupe which includes leather, Xenon's and Professional Media Package can be described as 'sparse' IMHO.

Infact everything on the options list bar SMG looks like a 'nice to have' rather than an 'essential'.

A £50k car having xenons and leather is hardly anything to rave about any more. 15 years ago that would have been noteworthy. 10 years ago BMW were fitting these as standard to an E92 318i. Hell, my girlfriends £400 Mazda 6 has both leather and xenons. The professional iDrive is good though.

Maybe I've been spoiled (ha!) but a 2016 M car where you still have to pull handles and shuffle yourself around to adjust the seat isn't great. Electric memory seats w/lumbar should be standard - whereas BMW want another £1000 for these, plus another £300 if you want them heated. It only has the basic bluetooth as standard also as opposed to the enhanced.
 
Last edited:
They are all nice to haves, it isn't sparsely equipped at all.

It has everything you'd reasonably need, regardless of what was standard on a made up 316i or a £400 Mazda :p
 
[TW]Fox;29384159 said:
They are all nice to haves, it isn't sparsely equipped at all.

It couldn't be described as well equipped. The only thing that it has which is expected on this type of car is the iDrive. Things like electric seats certainly don't fall into the "nice to have" category of a £50k ///M car. A nice to have in 2016 would be upgraded audio, reversing cameras, adaptive suspension (which isn't even an optional extra) and HUD's.

[TW]Fox;29384159 said:
It has everything you'd reasonably need, regardless of what was standard on a made up 316i or a £400 Mazda :p

You'd really be happy with black (and only black) leather, xenons and iDrive for your £50,000 (or £61,000 as someone has posted!)? You're a man of humble desires ;)
 
Last edited:
It couldn't be described as well equipped.

I strongly disagree. Remember, this is the hot version of an entry level coupe.

The only thing that it has which is expected on this type of car is the iDrive. Things like electric seats certainly don't fall into the "nice to have" category of a £50k ///M car.

It's not £50k it's £44070 before options. This is not £50k.

For context, this is the price of, say, a 530d. Which also doesn't have electric memory seats as standard.

This is not the hyper-expensive exotic-car you appear to think it is - for what it is, it's well specified.


You'd really be happy with black (and only black) leather, xenons and iDrive for your £50,000 (or £61,000 as someone has posted!)? You're a man of humble desires ;)

For my £44k if I wanted that sort of car - yes, I would.

Frankly there isn't much it hasn't got that my 5 Series has, even!

I really cannot see any standout items missing there. It has everything you could reasonably expect in this sort of car. It's a 2 Series not an M5!
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;29384223 said:
I strongly disagree. Remember, this is the hot version of an entry level coupe.

I love the looks, I love the size and it sounds like I'd love the drive, but it has nothing that suggests to me this is anything other than basic stuff.

[TW]Fox;29384223 said:
It's not £50k it's £44070 before options. This is not £50k.

Right you are, I was adding on the DCT because why wouldn't you. But even then it's £46.5k

[TW]Fox;29384223 said:
This is not the hyper-expensive exotic-car you appear to think it is - for what it is, it's well specified.

I will respectfully disagree. Whilst you've convinced me it isn't as sparse as a sparse thing, I think "adequately equipped" is more fitting.

[TW]Fox;29384223 said:
I really cannot see any standout items missing there. It has everything you could reasonably expect in this sort of car. It's a 2 Series not an M5!

It's just not got anything at all "wow!" on it. Like you say, this is probably down to the fact it's a 2 series. But then we look to only the class above and trhe 3/4 series has plenty of cool things like CFRP bits, carbon ceramic brake option, Adaptive suspension, LED headlights, HUD's etc but it appears not one thing has trickled it's way down to the 2 series.

I just think it's standard options (and even optional extras) are something I would expect to find in a BMW sales brochure 10 years ago. Having had a look at the options list of the old E82 1M, it's almost identical in kit levels and optional extras. I would expect the game to have moved on in 5 years and a whole new model.
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;29383548 said:
It's almost like such engines are not intended for use in genuinely sporty cars.

Despite the fact I can imagine how insufferable a diesel engine is in a convertible, you'll doubtless have noticed that paired with that gearbox it's actually pretty quick. Now imagine it in, say, a large saloon car and you can see how the engine has many strengths.

It is, of course, a ridiculous choice for somebody who wants a 'genuinely sporty' car in much the same as as the S54 engine is bloody awful for anyone who wants an effortless executive cruiser.

Hence why I said, used to, not, wanting a. I see no benefits to this engine over the equivalent petrol apart from MPG.
 
Hence why I said, used to, not, wanting a. I see no benefits to this engine over the equivalent petrol apart from MPG.

This would depend entirely on how you define an equivilent petrol. This is actually quite difficult in the current BMW range.

If the equivalent petrol is a 430i then there are considerable benefits - it is smoother, more refined, more powerful, offers a noticeable performance advantage is more efficient.

If the equivalent petrol is a 440i then there are no benefits apart from MPG - which is of course why this engine is barely offered in markets where fuel price is a triviality. But of course we don't live in those markets and our fuel price is not trivial therefore it's a fairly considerable benefit - but it's a financial decision.

The 430d is priced exactly midway between the 430i and the 440i. It's a couple of grand more expensive than a 430i and a couple of grand cheaper than a 440i.

Personally I don't think this engine works in a 4 Series convertible. It probably does in a 4 Series Coupe and it absolutely definitely does in a 5 Series or 7 Series saloon where the increased refinement is such that it works wonderfully with the car. It's not a sports car engine - which is why there is no Z4 SDrive30d.

I just think it's standard options (and even optional extras) are something I would expect to find in a BMW sales brochure 10 years ago. Having had a look at the options list of the old E82 1M, it's almost identical in kit levels and optional extras. I would expect the game to have moved on in 5 years and a whole new model.

Welcome to the law of diminishing returns. There is only so much you can really do and when your small coupe already has widescreen navigation, dual zone climate control, leather, Xenons, black panel display etc then enormous leaps in terms of offered equipment are not going to be found versus cars 5 years ago. Remember that generationally the generation the 2 Series is on began with the F01 7 Series 7 and a half years ago..

BMW's treatment of electric memory seats has always been bizarre - they went through a phase of including them as standard on the 'top' version of each model, so you ended up in odd situations whereby a Z4 3.0i and a 330Ci had electric memory seats as standard yet a more expensive 530i did not. They've sort of abandoned that premise now and the standard seats on some models are so electric that it's almost hard to justify the extra (On the LCI 5 Series the standard seat is fully electric with the exception of forward and backward, meaning its very hard to justify spending a grand for memory function!) yet on others leaving almost everything manual.
 
I really dislike the soft-tops. Coupes look so much better.

Found a 3 series yesterday that looked like exactly what i'll be looking for in a few years time. 320i and pretty much all the toys. Nice colour too, the dark grey :)
 
Why would you plan to get a 320i? A 320i is the sort of thing you end up with after not being able to find a different one surely. Seems odd to plan for a 320i - it offers nothing that other models in the 3 Series range don't simply do better, with the possible exception of availability at certain pricepoints?
 
Back
Top Bottom