Stiff_Cookie said:Some of the comments on here are laughable.
Arming cops will put more guns in circulation? Uh, only with the cops. Unless the cops are the ones commiting the crimes than the criminals are not going to have any moe guns available to them than they do now.
As for arming the police and the criminals will arm-up? The cops in the states are armed with shotguns, pistols and some with rifles. The criminals are still using pistols and shotguns. I think there has been one major case of automtic gun fire at the Bank of America but guess what! they would have used those guns regardless and it was only the use of armed police that they wre brought down.
I agree though, British police as a whole should not be armed. I have seen and experianced British police and do not trust them to use firearms in a safe manor. I dont think the mentality is there yet. Not just anyone can use a firearm with confidence and precision and I never saw that in British cops.
Defintly need to up-armor though. Bullet-proof vests are not THAT heavy and should be able to be worn by even the smallest police officers. Bullet proof vests with the Level III plate in them would provide stab proofing as well because IIRC a normal bullet-proof vest is not a good blade stopper. I dont really wanna test it out on mine though.
I agree that giving the police guns won't necessarily mean more guns in circulation, however criminals who own guns would be forced to use them.
As for not trusting British police with firearms, that is interesting. What occurrences have you had with British police? On the whole I have found them to be great at their job.