As I've already pointed out if you can't understand that basic point that the n word is (in wider usage) very offensive then that chain of discussion is a bit pointless. And no, I don't care if your bestist mate is black.
It totally depends on the context when using that word. In every sentence you have written you could have used the word and it shouldn't cause anyone any offence as you are not actually referring to anyone in particular reference the word you are simply stating the word as a word and nothing more.
One issue is that people do not understand context and as soon as they hear that word mention regardless of context they scream I'm offended or that's racist bla bla bla when actually they're just dumb idiots who are showing that they lack being educated enough to understand that the word can be used in the right context. The way the world is going these days depresses me![]()
Isn't Cisgender a perfectly logical word to use in place of where there wasn't one already?
I.e, it's a lot easier to say 'Cisgender' than ''Born Male or Female and identifies as Male or female respectively' (if I'm understanding the term correctly).
I dont recognise the term cisgender as a legitimate word so I can't comment
The NHS doesn't actually specify it as a mental disorder, the DSM5 is used over in america instead.
Indeed, listed on that very website is "Gender dysphoria is a recognised medical condition, for which treatment is sometimes appropriate. It's not a mental illness."
Gender should be defined for life by your determined gender at birth or what it is proven to be biologically. It's not possible to biologically change gender therefore it shouldn't be possible legally, either.
exactly thus 'healthy' doesn't work as an answer, it is a term for someone who is healthy in general not specific to anxiety
cis is specific to gender disorders
The point still stands - why do we need a term for people not suffering from gender disorders? Do you think there should be a term for people who don't suffer from anxiety? Depression? Cancer? etc..
Point was that people with these disorders or illnesses deviate from the norm, every condition doesn't require an opposite term for people who don't have that condition. CIS is frequently used in a derogatory manner by a fringe group so it is hardly surprising that some people object to it.
I dont recognise the term cisgender as a legitimate word so I can't comment
Indeed, listed on that very website is "Gender dysphoria is a recognised medical condition, for which treatment is sometimes appropriate. It's not a mental illness."
I recall some time ago that it was done for funding reasons, (I remember having to do a module on this at university)
Point was do we need a special label for people who don't have cancer? Do we have a special label for people who don't suffer from anxiety?
Because it's easier than writing people not suffering from gender disorders. I don't really care if there's a word for it or not but I certainly appreciate the fact there are fewer key strokes.
Why do you actually care so much that there is a word for it?
Filing in a form for those things is a yes/no answer.
Do you have cancer?
Do you suffer from anxiety?
Gender is a bit different.
What is your gender?
I don't - any more than you care so much that there is.
I'm stating my position that I don't see the need for it and highlighting the flaws in arguments for it so far.
Fact is it is often used in a derogatory way so people are perfectly entitled to object to it or ignore its use.
Filing in a form for those things is a yes/no answer.
Do you have cancer?
Do you suffer from anxiety?
Gender is a bit different.
What is your gender?