Canadian Grand Prix 2015, Montréal - Race 7/19

As above, how have Honda stuffed this up so badly? It's Honda for gods sake, in the world of road going engines they have produced some real peaches, they have been messing about with electrical power and hybrids for years. Yeah I know it's all "new" but you would have thought they could have brought something to the table that could at least compete.
 
The fact that they spent 2 tokens on reliability and retired both cars is laughable. May as well ***** them all now tbh.

Thats pretty damning.
They'd probably have to turn the engine down somewhat, to enable full race distance relability, however, if they do this, they may go slower than the Manor cars.

If I were Alonso, I would be plotting an exit strategy, as the McLaren team (unless the switch to Plan B*), looks to be going nowhere fast and actually getting worse, with every upgrade.

*Plan B: ditch the Honda engine and switch to Merc, for 2016. Allow Honda at least a year, to test their engine and ERS on their own private track using the previous year's car and in their laboratory. When Honda feel that they are ready, McLaren can introduce the Honda engine to their car in 2017 or 2018.
 
He also every single time he loses consistently says he lost the win in qualifying because if he was on pole he'd definitely win even though Hamilton has repeatedly beaten him when starting behind. That really irks me, just because you can't beat Hamilton on track doesn't mean you'd have certainly won if you started ahead.

Indeed. Last year makes a mockery of that excuse anyway as he was on pole 11 times to Hamilton's 7 yet Hamilton won 11 races to Rosberg's 5.

Hamilton is just better. Nothing more to it.
 
All this talk about McLaren... how come no one is mentioning Red Bull?

I did mention RBR in my original post, if you scroll up.
Yes, the work they are doing is pretty bad, though I think Newey has left them, so its not surprise.

I wouldnt write Honda off for next year.

Dude, I was shot down last Winter (by OCUK forumites) when I stated that I couldnt understand why McLaren would use a brand new engine supplier. The learning curve (and test results) required would take years. Like your quoted post, people seemed to believe that Honda would arrive with a strong package (something very rare in F1 - new cars/engines/teams usually require a several years before they start winning races).

E.Boullier himself has stated that they are looking at 18 months to be competitive again. Now, as a senior staff member, he has to give an optimistic estimate. So realistically, we could be looking at 2-4 years OR wait until their is another major revision of the rules, which should level the playing field.

Interestingly Alonsos sector 1 time in qualifying was 6th quickest, ...

6th place, in one sector (and terrible in other sectors) is nothing to brag about. And lets not forget that even if McLaren improve their car, their competitors will also improve their cars.

Whichever way you look at it, Honda and McLaren right now, are a laughing stock.
 
It was horrible seeing Vettel all over the back of Alonso then breeze past him out of the corner onto the straight. Even when Vettel locked up and went wide in the hairpin.
 
They can't change the designs for free though, they can only improve the existing components. So if they changed the MGUH to a different one because its more reliable then that's a use of tokens.
 
All this talk about McLaren... how come no one is mentioning Red Bull? They won 8 world championships on the bounce before last season and today finished 13th with their best driver. Shows how quickly things can turn in F1. I wouldnt write Honda off for next year..

Dropping from top to midfield is one thing, dropping from top to a backmarker who is lapped in 1/3rd of the race distance then having both cars retire is quite another.

All season we have been hearing about future updates and getting back to the top but there has been no sign of it, so far they have been as successful as canadas 'relaibility' upgrades.
 
If I were Alonso, I would be plotting an exit strategy, as the McLaren team (unless the switch to Plan B*), looks to be going nowhere fast and actually getting worse, with every upgrade.
Luckily the drivers & team aren't as short sighted as you are and realise it takes several seasons to get to where they want to be. Just ask Merc that took from 2010 until 2014 to do it and Red Bull who are on thier second bumpy season and no longer winning.
 
Interestingly Alonsos sector 1 time in qualifying was 6th quickest, once reliability is ironed out and the engine power is improved i still think McLaren will be comfortably in the top 10 by the end of the season and possibly 4th -6th place finishes then next season podiums and wins.

There is nothing to suggest that the will be anywhere the top 10 yet alone be comfortably in it.
 
All this talk about McLaren... how come no one is mentioning Red Bull? They won 8 world championships on the bounce before last season and today finished 13th with their best driver. Shows how quickly things can turn in F1. I wouldnt write Honda off for next year. This season is a testing season anyway, the team are testing in public so any of these Honda are doomed comments make no sense to me. It is a new project, starting from the ground up. This track was always going to be bad for the engine in its present state. Its a work in progress brand new oem technology being developed. Interestingly Alonsos sector 1 time in qualifying was 6th quickest, once reliability is ironed out and the engine power is improved i still think McLaren will be comfortably in the top 10 by the end of the season and possibly 4th -6th place finishes then next season podiums and wins.

Honda started developing their hybrid PU in 2014 (or even slightly earlier) when they knew they will be entering F1 again. Did Ferrari, Renault and Mercedes all not do the same? It was also a new project for they too from the ground up. Yet I did not witness as many failures from them in 2014 (their debut year with the hybrid PU) as I have seen from McHonda.

Don't get me wrong, I love Honda (I have owned Honda's most of my driving life) and I want them to succeed but this is just embarrassing. To top it off they had visibility of what the other engine manufacturers had done. I don't mind them being slow but consistently unreliable.

Yes lots can change in F1 in a short space of time but to suggest they will be top 10 come end of season is pie in the sky I think. Maybe next year when Honda revise the PU they maybe consistent top 10 finishers with the odd win or two. But realistically more likely to be 2017 before they are really competitive.
 
Last edited:
Can't believe the reaction the McLaren guy gave to the Sky reporters, what an absolute tool! What did he expect? His passing comment of "I'll definitely do this again" is ridiculous. Why do you think you are there? Because of the fans who are asking how you have got this season, and the past 2 so dramatically wrong! Tell us something real, instead of PR bull****! Tell us what failed and why!? Get a Honda representative out there to explain things and shout his/her corner!

Short fused, just like Ron.

Also, the national anthem before thew start?!? It sounded horrific! Was it a man putting on a woman's voice?!
 
Not as exciting as previous races at Montreal but I don't think it was a complete snooze fest. I thought Hamilton managed the race from the front extremely well and, although it is clear that Rosberg was limited by the machinery - brakes and fuel - to make a serious challenge, Hamilton was more than capable of rebuffing the couple of token efforts that Rosberg made.

When running, the McLaren pretty much performed up to the pre-race expectations but to see it once again suffer from reliability, especially after the upgrades, must be so disappointing. There's little doubt now that both drivers are in for a series of grid penalties for changing engines over the remainder of the season.

It is always tempting to judge the rest of the season based on the last race, and this was a particularly sobering one. With McLaren now starting to talk about next season, and even talk further of 18 months or more of development to get competitive, I fear that this will be Jenson's last year in F1. McLaren won't see the benefit of his experience with a car that's still so uncompetitive, and I believe they'll see it as an opportunity to give experience to one of their younger drivers, both of which can come with some sponsorship money too, of course.

F1 can be a very harsh environment, but if it does pan out like this it seems a poor way for Jenson to finish. The 2015 McLaren is proving to be lacking in so many areas.

Decent race by Bottas - surely Ferrari must be thinking about getting pen to paper sooner rather than later?
 
Honda started developing their hybrid PU in 2014 (or even slightly earlier) when they knew they will be entering F1 again. Did Ferrari, Renault and Mercedes all not do the same? It was also a new project for they too from the ground up. Yet I did not witness as many failures from them in 2014 (their debut year with the hybrid PU) as I have seen from McHonda.

Don't get me wrong, I love Honda (I have owned Honda's most of my driving life) and I want them to succeed but this is just embarrassing. To top it off they had visibility of what the other engine manufacturers had done. I don't mind them being slow but consistently unreliable.

Yes lots can change in F1 in a short space of time but to suggest they will be top 10 come end of season is pie in the sky I think. Maybe next year when Honda revise the PU they maybe consistent top 10 finishers with the odd win or two. But realistically more likely to be 2017 before they are really competitive.

but there on about changing the cars again by then
F1 has lost its way
 
Can't believe the reaction the McLaren guy gave to the Sky reporters, what an absolute tool! What did he expect? His passing comment of "I'll definitely do this again" is ridiculous. Why do you think you are there? Because of the fans who are asking how you have got this season, and the past 2 so dramatically wrong! Tell us something real, instead of PR bull****! Tell us what failed and why!? Get a Honda representative out there to explain things and shout his/her corner!

Short fused, just like Ron.

Also, the national anthem before thew start?!? It sounded horrific! Was it a man putting on a woman's voice?!
Damn, I missed this... does anyone have a clip of this interview?
 
but there on about changing the cars again by then
F1 has lost its way

It sounds like the wont be changing the PUs though, or if they do they will only been small tweaks to the rules.

I'm pretty certain that if the FIA announced a new engine format from 2017 both Honda and Renault would immediately announce they are leaving after 2016.
 
McLaren went through a lengthy lean spell in the 90s when Ron was in charge, somewhat ironically in part because Honda withdrew. Annoyingly the car still looks impressive.

I said I'd wait until the European season before I judged where Honda were at, as they were always playing catchup and appear to have potential, but given the lack of progress they've made since the opening 3 races it's hard to see how they'll get up to where they want to be.

They will get stronger and will be regularly challenging for points later in the season, but they were targeting race-winning pace by the end of the season, and that's certainly not going to be the case.

As Coulthard said in the commentary, they're slow, unreliable and thirsty. It's pretty much the worst case scenario. I guess at least 2 of those were connected yesterday, and possibly all 3 (lack of electrical power requires more juice, leaning the engine off means excessive heat), but still.



I did mention RBR in my original post, if you scroll up.
Yes, the work they are doing is pretty bad, though I think Newey has left them, so its not surprise.

I think Newey is still a consultant, but yes, the loss of him and the very highly rated Peter Prodromou to McLaren is hurting them.

McLaren have a reason for being slow, but Red Bull weren't that much quicker yesterday, and are at about the same pace as their identically-engined child team.
 
Last edited:
I am sick and fed up with hearing you need to save fuel and you need to manage brakes during the races. It spoils any chance of a battle and something needs to be done about it.

What if they were all made to fill the cars with the full 100kg or even a bigger fuel allowance (but still make them all fill the cars so they are all in the same boat) before the race. Surely that would eliminate most of this fuel saving nonsense? Refuelling during the race wouldn't solve this as they would still run as little as possible and refuelling destroys any on track action. It also looks like that idea is going to be binned anyway.

Brakes. Seeing as this usually refers to the rears isn't it about time that a minimum rear size of disc was forced on them? They need to be big enough to ensure they can last the race if the energy recovery system fails.


Can things get any worse for McLaren? Not only are they embarrassingly slow but they are incredibly unreliable as well. I now they were expecting a year of pain but Honda seems to have done a abysmal job of building a uncompetitive engine. I don't think any of the other's were this bad when the new engines were introduced. Alonso is clearly annoyed and frustrated by the situation and I wouldn't be surprised if he was looking for a seat elsewhere.
 
Back
Top Bottom