Cat abuse - Kenny Glenn

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4p
  • Start date Start date
Malc said:
Ha.

The point I was trying to make and which obviously went completely over your head, was that the video is evoking a disproportionate reaction as unnecessary cruelty and pain towards animals happens on a far larger scale all the time.
Click to expand...

I disagree, the point I was making, that clearly didn't even see your head below it through the clouds, is that you don't need to make a thousand internet threads to let the world know that you care more about something than something else. I care about the cats that make their way into my chinese soups, but I don't want to make a thread about it. This one however I do want to comment on, for no good reason other than its already being discussed, and there's a video of the event that's quite evocative.
If someone made a thread about mass-cruelty to animals, with chilling videos etc, i'll chat about that too. Just because I havent mentioned it doesn't mean I dont care about it.
 
Last edited:
Anon/b/ will go after his family business (oil trade), ring his house, send mail and allsorts.

Serious stuff lol.
 
snowdog said:
How can you compare this to each other anyways ? This cat wasn't killed, he was beat up 'for no reason', cows and pigs etc get killed so we can eat them, we hold them in massive farms for a reason.
Click to expand...

What I'm essentially saying is that if your a meat eater and complaining about this then your a hypocrite because you have contributed towards thousands/millions of animals being 'needlessly' slaughtered which I believe is worse than the beating up of one cat, I understand that your actions are indirect but I believe they are still worse IMO, worse in terms of animal cruelty and worse in terms of damaging our environment.

I know people won't like my stance on this but that's what I believe.
 
Helium_Junkie said:
To deliberately inflict pain on a creature completly unable to defend itself, for the purpose of causing harm, is not humane. It's not ethical, it's not moral. People who can happily commit these acts clearly do not understand the pain or fear they are inflicting, and should be made to so that they can comprehend the suffering they cause. It is the cotton-wool culture of "you can't spank children!" "no corporal punishment!" "no consequences for children at all!" that has caused the complete lack of respect that so many children now feel for life. Children kill their elders just for looking at them funny (this is based on real news articles so don't argue it, I'll dig out the sources if I have to, but I'm sure you've all heard of at least one such incident!), children take knives to school and stab their classmates, and their teachers. Children hurt animals.

Its happened before, of course it has. But it can't be denied that it's happening more now than in history.
Click to expand...

You have no evidence of animal cruelty being worse in this country nowadays. What about when horses were used to pull carts in this country? They were whipped, beaten and mistreated.

There are far more laws in place nowadays to protect animals although there certainly aren't enough I agree.

Plus, you're talking about it as if only children do it or when animal cruelty is commited, only children get away with it.

I don't care about newspaper articles. Thats just sensationalist nonsense and children aren't suddenly killing everything. Children can be and are cruel but thats been true since forever. Children still bullied eachother at school in the 70's or whenever.
 
lowrider007 said:
What I'm essentially saying is that if your a meat eater and complaining about this then your a hypocrite because you have contributed towards thousands/millions of animals being 'needlessly' slaughtered.
Click to expand...

Slaughtered humanely, vs beaten inhumanely. There's that element of ethics you're disregarding I think.
 
lowrider007 said:
What I'm essentially saying is that if your a meat eater and complaining about this then your a hypocrite because you have contributed towards thousands/millions of animals being 'needlessly' slaughtered which I believe is worse than the beating up of one cat, I understand that your actions are indirect but I believe they are still worse IMO, worse in terms of animal cruelty and worse in terms of damaging our environment.

I know people won't like my stance on this but that's what I believe.
Click to expand...



They aren't needlessly slaughtered, they are slaughtered for nutrition and a healthy diet.
Are you saying all Omnivores in the world are killing their meals needlessly?
 
lowrider007 said:
thousands/millions of animals being 'needlessly' slaughtered
Click to expand...

They're slaughtered for food, you can't change that fact by saying it's needless. You may not agree with it, but it doesn't change the fact that people eat the results.

The cat is being tortured for no reason other than this kid to get his jollys off. They're worlds apart.
 
Helium_Junkie said:
Slaughtered humanely, vs beaten inhumanely. there's that element of ethics you're disregarding so that you can sit on your soapbox.
Click to expand...

This is grey area that could probably be argued over many pages, one cat being beaten to me still does not compare to people contributing to millions of animals deaths, humanely killed or not.
 
lowrider007 said:
What I'm essentially saying is that if your a meat eater and complaining about this then your a hypocrite because you have contributed towards thousands/millions of animals being 'needlessly' slaughtered which I believe is worse than the beating up of one cat, I understand that your actions are indirect but I believe they are still worse IMO, worse in terms of animal cruelty and worse in terms of damaging our environment.

I know people won't like my stance on this but that's what I believe.
Click to expand...

Needlessly? So "for food" constitutes "needlessly"?
 
Nymins said:
What would you do then? Give him a good telling off? :rolleyes:

Totally agree with Noel here. I'd probably end up paralyzing the ***** if i was near him.
Click to expand...

Mmm, yeah. So you're solution for eradicating violence from society or from an individual is to use more violence?

Maybe someone should try talking to the teenager? Find out why he did it? Challenge his views? You know, using 21st century methods of dealing with the problem, not backwards medieval solutions.
 
lowrider007 said:
This is grey area that could probably be argued over many pages, one cat being beaten to me still does not compare to people contributing to millions of animals deaths, humanely killed or not.
Click to expand...

Animals being beaten for no reason imo is far far worse than animals being killed for food.

Helium_Junkie said:
No, but it might deter him from repeating it on another cat, or the same cat again.
Click to expand...

I doubt he will after all the threats and after being caught by the cops...

Same things with peado's after their address is known, it's only a matter of time till they throw in the windows at his house, spray his walls, threaten to kill him over the phone every day at night, etc...
Besides, he has to live with the fact that everyone that knows what he's done, prolly everyone around him, hates him for it.
 
Last edited:
Chimerical said:
Maybe someone should try talking to the teenager? Find out why he did it? Challenge his views? You know, using 21st century methods of dealing with the problem, not backwards medieval solutions.
Click to expand...

You know... coupled with a taser to the groin that might actually work.
21st century solutions to the rescue :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom