Have they really changed that much? Was with them for years until mid-2020. Vodafone offered a good price to switch at the time as I was an existing customer (mobile phone) so switched. Vodafone has been fine until recently. First found out the phone line was dead (BTOpenworld fixed) and now suffering performance/latency issues which they don't seem to be able to resolve, instead recommending a switch to full fibre while stating their tests show no problemsZen now is not Zen of old, people really need to stop with the rose-tinted nostalgia view.
IDNet offer the option of a phone line, including porting of your existing number. I've opted not to keep my landline, but I think it was a fairly cheap add-on.Have they really changed that much? Was with them for years until mid-2020. Vodafone offered a good price to switch at the time as I was an existing customer (mobile phone) so switched. Vodafone has been fine until recently. First found out the phone line was dead (BTOpenworld fixed) and now suffering performance/latency issues which they don't seem to be able to resolve, instead recommending a switch to full fibre while stating their tests show no problems. Reluctant to as it'd be a 2year contract and I'm not confident that I won't have the same issue.
Was thinking about switching back to Zen on a Home package (vs business currently - which I don't really need now). Are there better alternatives that can include a landline as wouldn't mind keeping my existing number?
In a word? Yes. If you could be lured away by saving a few quid, they can't have been that great in your opinion either. Vodafone aren't really that great from a CS/TS standpoint, in fact that's being pretty kind, the equipment isn't all that great either, but if you never have to deal with them and use your own, then the only real concern is the load balancing between London and Edinburgh, that randomly routes your traffic up to Scotland only for it in some cases to have to go back down to London anyway, capacity wise Vodafone obliterate Zen, but then again Zen has a relatively tiny subscriber base. It feels very much like the recent Zen plays are just about a cash grab by the new (old) CEO, and don't get me started on his video's, the recent tribunal doesn't do much to improve the perception of poor oversight/planning/running either.Have they really changed that much? Was with them for years until mid-2020. Vodafone offered a good price to switch at the time as I was an existing customer (mobile phone) so switched. Vodafone has been fine until recently. First found out the phone line was dead (BTOpenworld fixed) and now suffering performance/latency issues which they don't seem to be able to resolve, instead recommending a switch to full fibre while stating their tests show no problems. Reluctant to as it'd be a 2year contract and I'm not confident that I won't have the same issue.
Was thinking about switching back to Zen on a Home package (vs business currently - which I don't really need now). Are there better alternatives that can include a landline as wouldn't mind keeping my existing number?
He will have to set a VLAN ID of 911 in device manager on the NIC for him to be able to plug directly into the ONT.
Depends on where you are, where you are pinging and what's enroute between those things.Is this better than using the supplied router ?
Also what's latency like ? I'm seeing figures of 8ms in this thread I was expecting between 2 and 4 at the very most
Depends on where you are, where you are pinging and what's enroute between those things.
Physics limits my pings to London to a minimum of 3.5ms which assumes and perfectly straight single fibre across the country. In reality it's 8-14ms. But I can ping something local and get 1ms.
Finally installed, not impressed
Latency 5 ms
I get the full up/down speed BUT latency jumps to 30ms on download....
Home consumer ****ed as usual
Pinging bbc.co.uk [151.101.64.81] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=57
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=57
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=57
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=57
Ping statistics for 151.101.64.81:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 11ms
Pinging bbc.co.uk [151.101.64.81] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=57
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=57
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57
Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57
Ping statistics for 151.101.64.81:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms
Really ?There's no connection in the world that you can saturate without it having an impact on latency, run QoS if you want to max a speed test out while keeping pings low.
I don't think you understand what QoS is.why should I be applying QoS when the ISP is clearly doing it
I don't think you understand what QoS is.
You're taking a piece of cake mate or do you prefer to be layered in it?
QoS is not a solution, it's a poor compromise
Joking aside, Chris has tried the polite approach, let me try the direct approach: The problem here is not the connection, it's the user making poor choices, silly statements and demonstrating a complete lack of awareness of what's involved and refusing to accept advice offered from those who do. Good luck.
What's after a first world problem? Zeroth world problem?Finally installed, not impressed
Latency 5 ms
I get the full up/down speed BUT latency jumps to 30ms on download....
Home consumer ****ed as usual