Never really played any of the civ series. Is this better the 4?
From reading around there are lots of people saying it's a dumbed down 4 with pretty graphics. Any comment?
totally agree.
Never really played any of the civ series. Is this better the 4?
From reading around there are lots of people saying it's a dumbed down 4 with pretty graphics. Any comment?
Just finished my 1st game and really im completely gutted.
The games been dumbed down far too much
I have graphic corruption on the giant killer robot haha!
changes for the better are outnumbered by dumbing down
Move to orders are just broken half my stuff never gets there. especially shipping
I despise the way all units are now able to cross water - yet to see an enemy try it though.
I will play it again to win on a space race, culture or UN win or at least try to.
hope there are some patches soon.
tend to agree, its like a console game.
While IRL i don't care about religion, i understand its great importance for creating the world we live in today (war, peace, trade etc) and without that there's nothing really to go for other than war warmongering.
Used to be great rushing to get a few religion, then spreading it to get more gold (and allies), now there's nothing?
Specific religions are one of the very few things I actually miss from past civs, not too bothered though, it will be modded in and I am still enjoying the game anyway.
I dont. I hated being killed by Isabella just because I chose to be a budhist while she was a Jew![]()
I don't know what people were talking about not seeing enemies embark. Playing on King difficulty (I know I'm taking it easy for my first few games) the arabs decided to attack me because they didn't like me wiping out the persians. All of a sudden a swarm of them come across this 6 tile wide land bridge between our two continents, I send all my army up to take them on but what's this! Another swarm of their units hit the south of my continent from the water.
Not to say that it did them any good, I just wish I'd thought to build a naval combat vessel to have some fun with them. I should have taken screenshots, it might be the only time I see it happen apparently!
Despite worldwide feedbacks saying that Civ 5 is less enjoyable than Civ 4, but I just LUVE this game. Reason is simply that I keep on winning in fighting enemies!!Who wants to play a game who keeps on losing, Sid Miere has got it right this time.
I've started getting that as well, I'm still on ati 10.4's
Getting slightly annoying![]()
Its very marmite I think in the Civ 4/Civ 5 debate. On the official forums theres a poll asking which is better and when I last looked at it 47% of people said Civ 4 was better, 47% of people said Civ 5 was better and the rest said they were about the same. So its almost a 50/50 split.
I'm enjoying it , as I have all Civ games.
Do agree with the difficulty thing though, the absolute minimum to play on to get a good game imo is Emperor. Anything Emperor and above I enjoy.
EDIT : Just checked the poll again and its now 46%-45% in favour of Civ 5 (with the "they're the same" rising), but still essentially split down the middle.