Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Great upgrade, hope you did a before and after bench.
Its OK. just takes time to make it look like win10.Oh also the new CPU has made me eligible for windows 11 upgrade - should I or not?
You just see numbers change on CPU benchmarks. When your gaming, especially on games that benefit from a better CPU, it feels better, looks smoother and uses a lot more of your GPU.Cinebench r23 8266 to c.14600, so +77% for five years newer tech.
Always feels like CPU upgrades don't do a great deal doesn't it, unlike GPU upgrades.
I have experimented with this but Im unsure what its doing so I need some advice.If you don't have the option in your current BIOS and there's no newer one to try then you can always do it in windows using the PBO2 Tuner app.
Test setting in PBO2 Tuner | CPU clock | Temperature | Cinebench score |
0 (stock) | 4225 | 74 | 14211 |
-10 | 4322 | 77 | 14590 |
-15 | 4370 | 79 | 14751 |
I have experimented with this but Im unsure what its doing so I need some advice.
Here are my test results in Cinebench R23 running a 10 minute multicore test:
Test setting in PBO2 Tuner CPU clock Temperature Cinebench score 0 (stock) 4225 74 14211 -10 4322 77 14590 -15 4370 79 14751
Have I misunderstood what this was supposed to do, because I though undervolting the CPU would reduce temperatures and power consumption not increase them?
The CPU is boosting higher and getting a better score, but at the expense of more temperature so Im not sure if this is good?
If more performance comes with more temperature and power usage though, isn't that bad? I don't want to run it hotter and risk it's lifespan being deteriorated? I thought undervolting was supposed to make it run cooler?The CPU has a maximum temperature headroom. Since it is boosting higher that means it is getting it.
It is a win for you since you are getting more performance.
Try dropping it to -20, -25 and -30.
It will. Once it stablizes at 4.5ghz the temperature will drop.If more performance comes with more temperature and power usage though, isn't that bad? I don't want to run it hotter and risk it's lifespan being deteriorated? I thought undervolting was supposed to make it run cooler?
Ok here's the full results - I didn't crash at -30 on Cinebench 10 minute test.Try dropping it to -20, -25 and -30.
Test setting in PBO2 Tuner | CPU clock | Temperature | Cinebench R23 score |
---|---|---|---|
0 (stock) | 4225 | 74 | 14211 |
-10 | 4322 | 77 | 14590 |
-15 | 4370 | 79 | 14751 |
-20 | 4405 | 80 | 14878 |
-25 | 4430 | 78 | 14953 |
-30 | 4449 | 77 | 15039 |
I didn't write the figures down, but the increasing temperature initially was correlated with an increase in power consumption. It basically went from around 95 to 100 to 105 W reported in Ryzen Master in the first three tests, then in the later tests the power consumption reduced as did the temperature.The max is basically 4.45 during actual usage and can see you are able to hit that with -30 on the PBO2. Surprised it runs hotter at -10 compared to stock but perhaps there was some other limiter there
Ok here's the full results - I didn't crash at -30 on Cinebench 10 minute test.
Test setting in PBO2 Tuner CPU clock Temperature Cinebench R23 score 0 (stock) 4225 74 14211 -10 4322 77 14590 -15 4370 79 14751 -20 4405 80 14878 -25 4430 78 14953 -30 4449 77 15039
Don't understand whats physically happening here for temperature to go up initially then start to fall back at the more negative settings.
Also CPU is boosting to just about 4.45 GHz. I don't think it will reach 4.5.
Have you followed the steps shown in the GitHub link and used windows task scheduler to create the triggers for system startup and wake? If you have it might be worth double checking to make sure in the conditions and settings tab all the needed check boxes are selectedI cant get PBOtuner to run from the startup folder. Its set as 'on' in the startup app list, its got admin permissions, and it has the command line arguments for -30 all cores.
It just won't run on startup. Any ideas? It runs if I manually run it, so the link and path works. I do get a pop up though asking for permission to run, so maybe that is stopping it running on its own?
No I followed the other approach which is to create a program shortcut and put that shortcut in the windows startup folder. This should work, but isn't.Have you followed the steps shown in the GitHub link and used windows task scheduler to create the triggers for system startup and wake? If you have it might be worth double checking to make sure in the conditions and settings tab all the needed check boxes are selected
https://github.com/PrimeO7/How-to-u...X3D-Guide-with-PBO2-Tuner/blob/main/README.md
Since the X3D is the last AM4 CPU to be released and is very popular still, I don't think it will be coming down much.