• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Considering drop in upgrade from 1700X to 5800X3D

Cinebench r23 8266 to c.14600, so +77% for five years newer tech.

Always feels like CPU upgrades don't do a great deal doesn't it, unlike GPU upgrades.
You just see numbers change on CPU benchmarks. When your gaming, especially on games that benefit from a better CPU, it feels better, looks smoother and uses a lot more of your GPU.

I had 5600x before, moved to 5800x3d and the increase in performance in Escape from Tarkov was mindblowing with the same GPU (3080 in sig which isn't far from your 3070). Averages were up but the mins made the game so smooth in parts of maps that gave me problems were more than double than before. It was a game changer. In Hell Let Loose, not as great a leap as Tarkov but substantial improvements. Assetto Corsa on my Steam account I've still to try but 5800x3D is one of the best CPUs for that game still to this day. If you're playing games that a 5600x (or your x1700 which I doubt) could give you 90%+ GPU utilisation then you won't feel much of a difference but I doubt your x1700 was up to the task of getting the best out of your GPU.

If you're playing at 4k, then it's more on the GPU but I'd still say a 5600x/5700x and especially the 5800x3D will give you better mins than your x1700 and that's the most important factor because that's when games become sluggish, when dipping in to levels below 60 FPS, more so with high refresh rate. Even at 1440p 165Hz I was really impressed with the change from a 5600x to 5800x3D.
 
If you don't have the option in your current BIOS and there's no newer one to try then you can always do it in windows using the PBO2 Tuner app.
I have experimented with this but Im unsure what its doing so I need some advice.

Here are my test results in Cinebench R23 running a 10 minute multicore test:

Test setting in PBO2 TunerCPU clockTemperatureCinebench score
0 (stock)42257414211
-1043227714590
-1543707914751

Have I misunderstood what this was supposed to do, because I though undervolting the CPU would reduce temperatures and power consumption not increase them?

The CPU is boosting higher and getting a better score, but at the expense of more temperature so Im not sure if this is good?
 
Last edited:
I have experimented with this but Im unsure what its doing so I need some advice.

Here are my test results in Cinebench R23 running a 10 minute multicore test:

Test setting in PBO2 TunerCPU clockTemperatureCinebench score
0 (stock)42257414211
-1043227714590
-1543707914751

Have I misunderstood what this was supposed to do, because I though undervolting the CPU would reduce temperatures and power consumption not increase them?

The CPU is boosting higher and getting a better score, but at the expense of more temperature so Im not sure if this is good?

The CPU has a maximum temperature headroom. Since it is boosting higher that means it is getting it.

It is a win for you since you are getting more performance.

Try dropping it to -20, -25 and -30.
 
The CPU has a maximum temperature headroom. Since it is boosting higher that means it is getting it.

It is a win for you since you are getting more performance.

Try dropping it to -20, -25 and -30.
If more performance comes with more temperature and power usage though, isn't that bad? I don't want to run it hotter and risk it's lifespan being deteriorated? I thought undervolting was supposed to make it run cooler?
 
Last edited:
If more performance comes with more temperature and power usage though, isn't that bad? I don't want to run it hotter and risk it's lifespan being deteriorated? I thought undervolting was supposed to make it run cooler?
It will. Once it stablizes at 4.5ghz the temperature will drop.

I am running it with an air cooler at 85'C and it is designed for that.
 
Try dropping it to -20, -25 and -30.
Ok here's the full results - I didn't crash at -30 on Cinebench 10 minute test.

Test setting in PBO2 TunerCPU clockTemperatureCinebench R23 score
0 (stock)42257414211
-1043227714590
-1543707914751
-2044058014878
-2544307814953
-3044497715039

Don't understand whats physically happening here for temperature to go up initially then start to fall back at the more negative settings.

Also CPU is boosting to just about 4.45 GHz. I don't think it will reach 4.5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J.D
The max is basically 4.45 during actual usage and can see you are able to hit that with -30 on the PBO2. Surprised it runs hotter at -10 compared to stock but perhaps there was some other limiter there :)
 
The max is basically 4.45 during actual usage and can see you are able to hit that with -30 on the PBO2. Surprised it runs hotter at -10 compared to stock but perhaps there was some other limiter there :)
I didn't write the figures down, but the increasing temperature initially was correlated with an increase in power consumption. It basically went from around 95 to 100 to 105 W reported in Ryzen Master in the first three tests, then in the later tests the power consumption reduced as did the temperature.
 
Ok here's the full results - I didn't crash at -30 on Cinebench 10 minute test.

Test setting in PBO2 TunerCPU clockTemperatureCinebench R23 score
0 (stock)42257414211
-1043227714590
-1543707914751
-2044058014878
-2544307814953
-3044497715039

Don't understand whats physically happening here for temperature to go up initially then start to fall back at the more negative settings.

Also CPU is boosting to just about 4.45 GHz. I don't think it will reach 4.5.

It's bs marketing, mostly in workloads it's 4.45 , only hits it in extremely light loads the odd occasion
 
I cant get PBOtuner to run from the startup folder. Its set as 'on' in the startup app list, its got admin permissions, and it has the command line arguments for -30 all cores.

It just won't run on startup. Any ideas? It runs if I manually run it, so the link and path works. I do get a pop up though asking for permission to run, so maybe that is stopping it running on its own?
 
Last edited:
I cant get PBOtuner to run from the startup folder. Its set as 'on' in the startup app list, its got admin permissions, and it has the command line arguments for -30 all cores.

It just won't run on startup. Any ideas? It runs if I manually run it, so the link and path works. I do get a pop up though asking for permission to run, so maybe that is stopping it running on its own?
Have you followed the steps shown in the GitHub link and used windows task scheduler to create the triggers for system startup and wake? If you have it might be worth double checking to make sure in the conditions and settings tab all the needed check boxes are selected

https://github.com/PrimeO7/How-to-u...X3D-Guide-with-PBO2-Tuner/blob/main/README.md
 
Have you followed the steps shown in the GitHub link and used windows task scheduler to create the triggers for system startup and wake? If you have it might be worth double checking to make sure in the conditions and settings tab all the needed check boxes are selected

https://github.com/PrimeO7/How-to-u...X3D-Guide-with-PBO2-Tuner/blob/main/README.md
No I followed the other approach which is to create a program shortcut and put that shortcut in the windows startup folder. This should work, but isn't.
 
Last edited:
Wish i did not get a 5800X now.

Would not mind getting a 5800X3D myself, but can't justify the outlay.

Maybe one day if they become a lot cheaper (even SH).

But i tend to agree with J.D.

Since the X3D is the last AM4 CPU to be released and is very popular still, I don't think it will be coming down much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J.D
I’ve just picked one up coming from a non 3D.

It’s an ok chip and I only picked it up as I had some balance to use at another on line store.

Do I regret it, no. I see some improvements in what I use it for and less in others.

For me, it will be a short stop gap to AM5.
 
Back
Top Bottom