'Contact lost' with Malaysia Airlines plane
- Thread starter Domo
- Start date
As is the rest of the worlds resources some of which work or have worked in intelligence or security agencies and without the wreckage almost anything is possible until proven otherwise.
Another angle might be to consider how much resource has been sent to aid from other countries, is this commensurate with other airline disappearances? If it has gone down in the ocean would other countries be putting such emphasis on finding it or are they doing so because the alternative is perceived as a credible possibility that they can't take the risk in ignoring.
The theory of it being hijacked (remotely or otherwise) are not my theories but have appeared in various forms across various media.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,370
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Then why mislead people that you don't watch the News when you've just admitted it is on the works plasma all day and you do watch it?
Waits for some inter-dimensional BS.
There was one on last friday as well lol
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
So has anyone thought that searching the surface of the ocean for something that is likely to be on the bottom is a bit of folly yet?
Surely the flight recorder boxes need to be upgraded so that they can be found by sonar fir hundreds of miles away?
Surely the flight recorder boxes need to be upgraded so that they can be found by sonar fir hundreds of miles away?
Trouble is, it all takes power!
As it is (IIRC) the batteries powering the flight recorder radio transmitter will only last 30 days or so (IE They will be flat within a fortnight) after which any chance of finding it on the bottom of the ocean will become remote!
Perhaps flight recorders should be equipped with RTG's?
He seems to know an awful lot about Al Jazeera news as well. They must have 2 plasma tv's at his work, one stuck on BBC and the other on Al Jazeera?
I imagine it takes more effort to search the bottom than the surface
Do you think I squander my words? Go back to the post and look. I said it's mostly stuck on BBC News 24. Sometimes it's on Al Jazeera and others [if we're unlucky] Sky News.
Last edited:
I would presume that is why HMS Echo is on the way to the area. They are continuing to search the surface because thats pretty much all they can do at the moment.
They need a start point tho, & there best chance of getting a start point is to find surface debris, & then plot it's likely course based on current, wind speed etc, otherwise where do you start the search of the ocean floor?.
I believe after thirty days there's still another way they can find it, some other kind of signal it gives out but I can't remember what it is. This media hype about "only thirty days, and the clock is ticking!" isn't the whole story. Otherwise they wouldn't have found the AF447 black box after two years.
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,086
- Location
- Berkland
So the Chinese have spotted some stuff floating in about the same area (about 120km from the first stuff spotted).
Its been 6 days from the last sat picture where they identified some stuff they wanted to find, so I wonder if it is the same bits, just floated a 120km away? Can currents take an object 120km in 6 days?
Its been 6 days from the last sat picture where they identified some stuff they wanted to find, so I wonder if it is the same bits, just floated a 120km away? Can currents take an object 120km in 6 days?
Yup they can, some sea currents can reach speeds of 9kph, so 120km in 6 days is neither here nor there.
someone told me that one of the pilots had flight sim stuff on his computer at home with deleted files on landing a plane on a very small island in the indian ocean? havent heard this anywhere offical yet
i have also heard ideas that people in N. Korea (or insert similar other) wanted to try ahcking into a plane to test if they could and ditched it.
lols
to me i can only the pilots have some part to play in this. Maybe one did want to go somewhere crazy and they just ran out of fuel. Nothing really makes sense. it surely must be a human action rather than a fault in this case? to complex of a series of events and external evidence for it to be an 'accident'
but of course it could always be because we need to go to war with the indian ocean ..they have oilzzz!
i have also heard ideas that people in N. Korea (or insert similar other) wanted to try ahcking into a plane to test if they could and ditched it.
lols
to me i can only the pilots have some part to play in this. Maybe one did want to go somewhere crazy and they just ran out of fuel. Nothing really makes sense. it surely must be a human action rather than a fault in this case? to complex of a series of events and external evidence for it to be an 'accident'
but of course it could always be because we need to go to war with the indian ocean ..they have oilzzz!