• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Core 9000 series

Alleged i9-9900K 3DMark benchmark:

In terms of performance, the chip scored 10,719 points in the CPU specific run and an overall score of 9725 points with a Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics card. The chip was tested on the ASUS Z370-F STRIX Gaming motherboard which confirms backward compatibility on the existing 300-series motherboards while being supported by the upcoming Z390 motherboards. Comparing the CPU score to other flagship mainstream CPUs, we see the 9900K to be clearly ahead by a lead of 1500 points over AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X and 2500 points over the Intel Core i7-8700K.

https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-9900k-8-core-benchmark-3dmark-performance-leak/
 
Alleged i9-9900K 3DMark benchmark:

In terms of performance, the chip scored 10,719 points in the CPU specific run and an overall score of 9725 points with a Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics card. The chip was tested on the ASUS Z370-F STRIX Gaming motherboard which confirms backward compatibility on the existing 300-series motherboards while being supported by the upcoming Z390 motherboards. Comparing the CPU score to other flagship mainstream CPUs, we see the 9900K to be clearly ahead by a lead of 1500 points over AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X and 2500 points over the Intel Core i7-8700K.

https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-9900k-8-core-benchmark-3dmark-performance-leak/

Looks impressive.

Unsure whether to get one though, because i fear the next gen stuff on smaller dies (like Zen 2/ Ryzen 3XXX series) will be an even bigger step forward.

I guess if my z370 board will take one and you get a good deal on one, it might be worth an upgrade.
 
Alleged i9-9900K 3DMark benchmark:

In terms of performance, the chip scored 10,719 points in the CPU specific run and an overall score of 9725 points with a Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics card. The chip was tested on the ASUS Z370-F STRIX Gaming motherboard which confirms backward compatibility on the existing 300-series motherboards while being supported by the upcoming Z390 motherboards. Comparing the CPU score to other flagship mainstream CPUs, we see the 9900K to be clearly ahead by a lead of 1500 points over AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X and 2500 points over the Intel Core i7-8700K.

https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-9900k-8-core-benchmark-3dmark-performance-leak/

That is the engineering sample with 3.1GHz base clock so retail CPU with 3.6GHz base will see overall score higher than 9725 3DMark.
 
Alleged i9-9900K 3DMark benchmark:

In terms of performance, the chip scored 10,719 points in the CPU specific run and an overall score of 9725 points with a Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics card. The chip was tested on the ASUS Z370-F STRIX Gaming motherboard which confirms backward compatibility on the existing 300-series motherboards while being supported by the upcoming Z390 motherboards. Comparing the CPU score to other flagship mainstream CPUs, we see the 9900K to be clearly ahead by a lead of 1500 points over AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X and 2500 points over the Intel Core i7-8700K.

https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-9900k-8-core-benchmark-3dmark-performance-leak/


Price tag on this should be funny to say the least.
 
That is the engineering sample with 3.1GHz base clock so retail CPU with 3.6GHz base will see overall score higher than 9725 3DMark.

I'd take that with a pinch of salt, 3dmark routinely gets clock speeds wrong. I used it the other night and it told me the max clock my 2700x got to was 4.7ghz. And its running at stock.
 
Last edited:
"...upcoming Z390 motherboards..."

What, the boards that don't exist?

Last thing I heard Z390 wasn't happening because 10nm doesn't work, so Z390's functionality was replicated with 3rd party controllers but the core was staying the same and being labelled "Z370 refresh".
 
we just have to wait until they show actual specs.... I really can't see that 5ghz happening on that 8core cpu .... 1 core @5ghz in light loads maybe... but still highly unlikely
 
we just have to wait until they show actual specs.... I really can't see that 5ghz happening on that 8core cpu .... 1 core @5ghz in light loads maybe... but still highly unlikely

Well that's assuming intel don't bundle it with their nuclear power plant cooler they used on that 28 core chip. :p
 
I guess we're going to be hearing about the 4.5Ghz Ryzen 2800X pretty soon now, if those 9900K benchmark scores are legit.. :)
The 2800x could make an appearance but it's not realistically going to be better than what the top ~10% of 2700x can reach when overclocked, so I doubt it would be able to reach 4.5ghz on all cores. I just pulled those figures out of thin air so feel free to take it with a pinch of salt
 
Back
Top Bottom