Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 21,988
- Location
- Wilds of suffolk
It's a very strange coincidence that the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention facility, was in the middle of moving buildings right near where the Covid virus was 1st detected. As stated in news article, it didn't have as strict protocols as the Virology institute.
A Danish head of a WHO team said;
“It’s interesting that the lab relocated on the 2nd of December 2019: That’s the period where it all started,” Embarek, a food safety and animal diseases expert, said in a documentary that aired on the Danish television channel TV2.
“We know that when you move a lab, it disturbs everything…That entire procedure is always a disruptive element in the daily work routine of a lab,”
"In the documentary, Embarek also revealed that his team was pressured by Chinese officials not to pursue the lab leak theory."
Im not sure what disturbs everything is supposed to mean. I mean when we did work on the labs at the last place i worked it disturbed the workflow and output the people could perform.
There was time that needed to be spent tuning etc.
We didn't release any of the nasties that were in there at any point.
So Ithink context is important and we don't know what hes really talking about.
I am sure they pressed for that. The Chinese try to supress ANYTHING thats not positive for them. I wouldn't read anything into that, at all.
Yeah that is an important side often overlooked.
There are several bits of information that are too often overlooked including the presence of S and L type variants of COVID (I believe what is denoted A and B in that article) present from almost if not day 1 in Wuhan - which almost certainly means it was in circulation, in humans, for at least a month elsewhere before the emergence at the market. Personally I don't hold too much by the presence of zoonotic genetic material as presented in that article though as there is far too much missing information and the lack of intermediate variants of the virus found in animals (also compared to the nearest known ancestor in the wild). Not sure we'll ever know the truth but currently I hold most of the leading possibilities as equally plausible and and equally falling short of a conclusive explanation.
Yeah well they mention that in their report, and virtually rule it out as being human introducing it to the market.
I totally agree on the conclusion part, we will never know for sure since as I mentioned a lot of the evidence trail (if it even existed) is now gone, its just impossible to recreate.
Funny thing is (and knowing the Chinese hate of waste) if something really gross happened like someone took some waste that should have been disposed of from the Lab and sold it to the market.
It kind of fits both scenarios then. People came in contact with it, (it wasn't a lab leak but a failure of probably some waste contractor), when it was moved and that triggered the chain.
Pretty gross but I could see it.