Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
i'd hate to be a game dev, they just can't win. crytek makes a game that truly pushes the hardware with crysis 1 and everyone whines that it should run better, so they make crysis 2 and it runs well on day one so then they complain it's just a port and should push the hardware more and run worse. now were back to step 1 again with crysis 3 and it should run better. dunno how people can say that it looks worse than the 1st crysis, really no idea
Thats nice and all but the game doesnt LOOK good to be that demanding.
This is the problem, not that it's demanding.
BF3 looks better and even FC3 does.
You missing the point here. I not trying to run this game on Ultra with a single card I can understand I need more power to run.
I am setting the Beta at Medium/high settings and getting 60fps and drops to 30fps and staying there for couple mins.
The Alpha Run much better on All high settings so I just hoping its the coding and drivers.
But I will not be buying the game till I know it runs fine.
i'd hate to be a game dev, they just can't win. crytek makes a game that truly pushes the hardware with crysis 1 and everyone whines that it should run better, so they make crysis 2 and it runs well on day one so then they complain it's just a port and should push the hardware more and run worse. now were back to step 1 again with crysis 3 and it should run better. dunno how people can say that it looks worse than the 1st crysis, really no idea
Thats nice and all but the game doesnt LOOK good to be that demanding.
This is the problem, not that it's demanding.
BF3 looks better and even FC3 does.
I also think visually it looks fantastic. Copious amounts of AA will cripple even the best systems. I love to see games that push our systems so hard and then compare them to the console versions.
My potential son in law played BF3 on a PS3 and when he see me playing it on ultra settings, he couldn't believe how bad it looked on his PS3. I built him an I5 system soon after
Crysis 3 is for real men.
show him the crysis 3 comparison
x360
http://i.minus.com/i8hSQtc0vqoIE.PNG
PC
http://i.minus.com/iwjahbdNVt5mt.png
Anyone who says that looks crap is acting derp....
Look at the complexity and detail in that.
I'm a big fan of the quality of the GFX in BF3, they are impressive, but Crysis3 beats it, i think.
The amount of texture in it is unreal, the tessellation in this game must be off the scale, no wonder all GPU's choke on it.
I also think visually it looks fantastic.
i'd hate to be a game dev, they just can't win. crytek makes a game that truly pushes the hardware with crysis 1 and everyone whines that it should run better, so they make crysis 2 and it runs well on day one so then they complain it's just a port and should push the hardware more and run worse. now were back to step 1 again with crysis 3 and it should run better. dunno how people can say that it looks worse than the 1st crysis, really no idea
Thats nice and all but the game doesnt LOOK good to be that demanding.
This is the problem, not that it's demanding.
BF3 looks better and even FC3 does.
I also think visually it looks fantastic. Copious amounts of AA will cripple even the best systems. I love to see games that push our systems so hard and then compare them to the console versions.
Crysis 3 is for real men.
I also think visually it looks fantastic. Copious amounts of AA will cripple even the best systems. I love to see games that push our systems so hard and then compare them to the console versions.
My potential son in law played BF3 on a PS3 and when he see me playing it on ultra settings, he couldn't believe how bad it looked on his PS3. I built him an I5 system soon after
Crysis 3 is for real men.
Just one problem with that, the PS4 (Orbis) is rumoured, increasingly rumoured to be getting an AMD 8 Core Steamrooler + 7950 APU hybrid.
I can't see it myself, re- TDP / Cooling, But its obvious that Sony are pushing the boat out with Orbis, judging by what they say they want it to do, it probably will do 1920 x 1080P HQ GFX, and end up with a 4 core Steamrooler + 7850 equivalent GPU.
On a Game Console with a very lite OS purely designed for gaming its probably going to be quite good.
Why is there a problem?