Crysis - Tamed. C.U.D.A.A.T.S [CCC] v2.21

In some parts with the cfg I use I play at 4xAA at 1680x1050, gets rid of most jaggys, and you say its not real AA?
 
willhub said:
In some parts with the cfg I use I play at 4xAA at 1680x1050, gets rid of most jaggys, and you say its not real AA?
Click to expand...

Where did I say it's not real AA? Jumpy or what? I was referring to the notion of Crysis' relatively poor non-multisampling edge AA

In these configs, they're all using r_edgeaa=1 which isn't even proper multisampling, just blurs the edges. The biggest difference one can do is to enable 4xAA at least.

When I say I can 'only use 4xAA at 1280x1024' which I assume you read as 'only 4xAA' implying it's too small or inadequete, I meant that the resolution itself is tiny. I could do 4xAA at 1680x1050 but it dips too much.
 
willhub said:
Not impressed with the screenies linked above though, I might try CCC again once I have backed my crysis installation up but its not very good in long distance, blury just how I had it.
Click to expand...

It is meant to be blury, its 'Depth of Field'.

If you don't like it just turn the DoF options off in the config. Some people like it some people hate it.

g_dof_ironsight [0,1] - If set to 0, disables the Depth of Field (DOF) effect which occurs when using your weapon's iron sights. This makes everything much sharper, and can improve FPS, but reduces realism for some people (system).

g_dofset_maxscale [value] - This setting, along with g_dofset_minscale, can be used to adjust the extent to which the Depth of Field effect blurs surrounding objects which are not in focus. For example setting both values =1 results in more subtle blurring around the edges, while setting both to =3 makes the blurring more prominent (system).
Click to expand...

Just like motion blur, personally I HATE motion blur, but most of my friends love it and can't play without it.
 
I don't get how people play with these configs, they look worse than the default settings. They turn off detail from a medium-long range to give you some more detail close up... essentially making them nice as screenshot configs but nothing else. Playing with them is impossible when all you notice is what they turned down / off in the process.
 
Spektor said:
I don't get how people play with these configs, they look worse than the default settings. They turn off detail from a medium-long range to give you some more detail close up... essentially making them nice as screenshot configs but nothing else. Playing with them is impossible when all you notice is what they turned down / off in the process.
Click to expand...

The reason I play with the configs is because they look better than the default settings, how they look in screenshots is how they look in game for me.....

I fail to notice what they turned down, it just looks so god damnd beautiful compared to the standard settings I dont want to go back to the standard settings. Infact some of the configs have more detail in the medium/long range if you have never noticed
 
Plus some configs just make levels look 100x better.

Check out the pics of Core on the CCC pack compared to how it looks normally, the difference is night and day.
 
iBot said:
the game looks pretty out of the box
it takes 4 hours to complete
multiplayer sucks
no replay value

why do people bother modding it?

Farcry was a much better game imo
Click to expand...

some people mod a 'rubbish game' because they see the potential in the engine.
 
KNiVES said:
Where did I say it's not real AA? Jumpy or what? I was referring to the notion of Crysis' relatively poor non-multisampling edge AA

In these configs, they're all using r_edgeaa=1 which isn't even proper multisampling, just blurs the edges. The biggest difference one can do is to enable 4xAA at least.

When I say I can 'only use 4xAA at 1280x1024' which I assume you read as 'only 4xAA' implying it's too small or inadequete, I meant that the resolution itself is tiny. I could do 4xAA at 1680x1050 but it dips too much.
Click to expand...

Lol I was only saying and you say its not real AA? There is no problem with that... I wanted to know why you felt it wasent real AA.

You said "Crysis will only start to look good when real anti-aliasing comes along"

So I said, an you says its not real AA? As thats what it seemed like.
 
both

I just tried CCC again but DX10, my saves wont low, will try DX9 one soon.
 
Last edited:
willhub said:
Uh, that sucks, no CCC for me I'll go try a better cfg :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It is the TOD mod that makes you have to start new games.

Doesn't really matter tho as you can just use:

map <whatever>

To jump to any area of the game and continue...
 
What do I type in to skip to the part where you are in that little site with the dead ship and abit of ice? In the site near the forest?

Just tried that Xconfig or whatever and it looks the same as the config I have always been using apart from its slower, dunno if itsjust cause its night though.
 
I need some help.

Can someone try recreate this? I dont know how I got mine like it, but the cfg I thought I used dont look like that :(.

crysisO.jpg


Crysis2007-11-1714-50-20-92.jpg
 
willhub said:
I need some help.

Can someone try recreate this? I dont know how I got mine like it, but the cfg I thought I used dont look like that :(.

crysisO.jpg


Crysis2007-11-1714-50-20-92.jpg
Click to expand...

Try this:

con_restricted=0
r_displayinfo=0

r_VSync=0
d3d9_TripleBuffering=0
r_ssao_quality=1
r_ssao_amount=0.2
r_SSAO_darkening=3.6
r_TerrainAO_FadeDist=1
r_HDRlevel=0.5
r_TexturesStreaming=0
r_sunshafts=1
r_ColorGradingDOF=0
r_ShadowJittering=1
r_ShadowBlur=0
r_GetScreenshot=1
r_GeomInstancing=1
r_UsePOM=1
r_MotionBlur=2

e_hw_occlusion_culling_object=1
e_gsm_lods_num=4
e_shadows_from_terrain_in_all_lods=0
r_UseEdgeAA=2
e_shadows_max_texture_size=512
e_view_dist_ratio=45
e_water_ocean_fft=1
e_particles_lod=0.7
e_vegetation_min_size=1.5
e_view_dist_ratio_vegetation=50

q_ShaderShadow=1
r_EyeAdaptationBase=0.2
 
Pretty sure I was using that config yesterday.

*edit* oh no, it just looks similar, yeh I'll try it later thanks.
 
I'm getting some bizzare performance in XP, 1680x1050 high on the island level its like 40-60fps, but little logs and stuff dont appear untill you are right up on them, and when I enable 4xAA it drops right down to like 14fps, when its around 30 in Vista :confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom