I've been stopped once in oxford for cycling on pavement and one friend got fined for it.
I'd like to thank the motorist who pulled out on me Friday morning and put me in A&E.
I've ended up with cracked ribs and a poorly bike but her car was way worse -
AND I PAY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROADS
Its not so much what he should or shouldn't do - I know it doesn't come over in my posts very well - and I might be unfairly judging him based on the attitudes shown by the riders in some of the similar videos that are on youtube.
I just don't have a lot of sympathy for the attitudes typically shown by the riders in these kind of videos when riding in an assertive and/or advanced manner and not making enough allowance for the fact that not all road users are going to have the same level of proficiency even when they aren't being muppets or unsafe as such.
If they are going to ride in that manner then IMO they should deal a bit more with the fact that they are going across some situations which other drivers don't handle so well. (Thats not to say they won't have some unfortunate interactions sticking to the cycle lanes and a slower pace, etc. but still its asking less on the skill of other road users).
End of the day though that van driver needs taking off the road if you watch the bit towards the end when hes in the distance his driving is atrocious and likely to get someone hurt or worse sooner or later.
I hope you're claiming on her insurance!
Do cyclists not need insurance? If they are using the same roads as other vehicles, then why not? Doesn't it just mean that, even if a cyclist did cause any damage to another road user, they wouldn't be brought up on it?
Cyclists don't have to have insurance but many with more expensive bikes will do. Regardless, if the accident was the fault of the other road user he should be claiming on theirs.
Or you could just cycle on the pavement where its much safer.
and what happens if the fault is that of the cyclist without insurance?
Or you could just cycle on the pavement where its much safer.
small claims court?
The only issue I can see with having no insurance is it must be easy to get away with? A car causing damage, even they if they speed away. You can identify them by the licence plate. A bike doesn't have anything to identify them in the case that someone doesn't stop after causing damage.
Down here in Brighton we see this a lot and police don't seem to care.
We also see people on the road who shouldn't be. People on rollerskates and skateboards quite a lot. My favourite though are people on mobility scooters who ride in the middle of the road and then go onto the pavement at full speed. (Some of them have licence plates but the majority don't )
I hope you're claiming on her insurance!
Do cyclists not need insurance? If they are using the same roads as other vehicles, then why not? Doesn't it just mean that, even if a cyclist did cause any damage to another road user, they wouldn't be brought up on it?
Sure, but then you put more risk on pedestrians on the pavement it's like a game which can't be won and cyclists are stuck in the middle.
Care to comment?
Only if your riding like an idiot,like i previously said i only ride a tad bit faster than you would consider normal walking speed.
Care to comment?
When you have a valid point, sure