[TFU] Thegoon84;30048657 said:I wanted the warranty and not a 5 year old Audi..... If its any consolation I bought it as a long term/lifer car. When I finish paying for it in in 2.8years I will use it as my car for carrying my mountain bike and taking the dog out. Should last me many many many years....
My wife wants a second hand audi next.
PS Tell me who would buy an Audi over this beauty ( Exact one I have only mine is a little newer)
![]()
Madness.
I bought a 2 year (as opposed to 5 year) old Audi A6, do 25k miles per year and I have lost £9k in depreciation over 3 years, by comparison you will spend almost that much to do low mileage in a Dacia Duster!
Whilst I admire your commitment to keep the car long term, past experience tells me that most people who insist on buying a new car end up changing it after 3 years for for all the reasons you have described for buying this car, I.e. warranty, wanting something new that is low maintenance. Most people who are worried about maintenance/warranties simply don't keep their car for many many years even if they originally intended to.
It usually starts with a phone call from the dealer when you are most of the way through your payments saying you can transfer the equity into a brand new car and actually make lower payments than you do already to get a brand new car instead of your 3 year old one that is now out of warranty.
[TFU] Thegoon84;30048415 said:Its £149 for a poxy oil change and oil filter change.... JOKE! I've rung around a few deals, more or less the same price
Lucky.Lets be honest they must make next to nothing selling a car for that surprise. Its no wonder the dealerships to actually function as a business have to inflate service prices like this? Honda happiness for example, cheaper serviced but they dealer is already happy from a £19k Civic sale!
So you spent lets assume, £11K on a cheap horrible econobox which will be worth buttons in a few years time, and claim to be 'tight'?
Does that make more sense than spending £3K on a second hand Audi (practically a Rolls Royce in comparison) and having enough change to literally buy three spare ones?
[TW]Fox;30051548 said:A ridiculous comparison. The ownership experience is completely different. There are many reasons why somebody might prefer a new car to messing about keeping a 10-15 year old Audi on the road - even if it does work out no cheaper.
You will never win an argument against a new car buyer by telling them they should have bought something really old for 20p because they are completely different ownership prospects and simply not comparable.
A better argument would be 'You should have bought a 6-12 month old Dacia Duster' if you wanted to go down the used > new route. Almost all of the new car benefits but with the used car price benefit.

"If you’re on a tight budget and want a brand new SUV, then the Dacia Duster could well be the car for you."
Read more: Dacia Duster SUV review | Carbuyer http://www.carbuyer.co.uk/reviews/dacia/duster/suv/review#ixzz4LYKzZ6aj
Follow us: @CarbuyerUK on Twitter | CarbuyerUK on Facebook
When I bought my mazda they said they serviced it. The oil was blacker than black so made them do it again before I collected it
On your own, on your own, on your own!!![]()
The Duster is a fine automobile. Huge boot, loads of room for passengers front and back. Pokey enough with the 1.5 DCI engine. Perfect for someone that wants something practical, new and cheap.
![]()
£150 for a service at a main dealer doesn't sound bad at all really...