Dalglish resigned/sacked?

In an ideal world he'd be your manager for the next 10 years but we can't all get what we'd like;)

As long as we play your lot every week. His record as Liverpool manager vs Chelsea is quite interesting. As is the fact that he's personally won more trophies than Chelsea have :p
 
http://www.chelseafc.com/page/TheManagement/0,,10268~919813,00.html

Joined Chelsea in 2009..... so the only reason for wanting AVB near a club has gone :p

The only person who looks like a woman who was at the club a couple years ago AVB could put back on the bench at Liverpool is........ Torres :p

Ah well, sod AVB then :D

We certainly don't need her at Newcastle when we have this beauty in the stands!

273947-newcastle-united-fan.jpg


And no I wont resize, like at them moobs and suffer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D:D:D:D
 
Two reasons really. He appears to have been given all the credit for the way Swansea play football when it was Martinez that got them playing that way years ago and secondly one season in the Premiership isn't anywhere near enough experience to manage one of Europes biggest clubs. European experience, preferably a European winner, is a must imo.

Fair enough although I'd say he deserves credit for managing the transition after Martinez left and then for putting in a pretty good season in the Premiership at the first attempt.

Are there many managers out there with European cup winning experience (any of them) who are available at the moment and would consider Liverpool a desirable option? Is Andres Villas-Boas someone you'd consider suitable or just a bit more suitable than Mr Rodgers?

Why were you looking in that much detail? :eek:

I'm not sure but that would be one of the few times when a rubbish phone camera would have been a blessing...
 
Are there many managers out there with European cup winning experience (any of them) who are available at the moment and would consider Liverpool a desirable option? Is Andres Villas-Boas someone you'd consider suitable or just a bit more suitable than Mr Rodgers?

I'm not sure how realistic they are (actually I am - they're not realistic) but all the rags are running the same story in the mornings papers, reporting that we've put Guardiola and Capello at the top of our wanted list.

As for Rodgers' suitability compared to other possible candidates; if you were to discount Guardiola & Capello (and probably Klopp), of the names bandied about you'd be left with Martinez, Rodgers, Deschamps, Benitez (won't happen though) and AVB. Looking at what each candidate has achieved, where & how (style of play etc) he achieved it, I'd say that Rodgers was the least suitable/biggest risk. AVB wouldn't be ideal (mainly on the back of his mistakes at Chelsea) but his added experience at a higher level both domestic but particularly in Europe would make him a far more suitable candidate in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
I didn't know it was confirmed AvB and Capello had been interviewed. Why has Martinez gone in that case? Why would Liverpool ask Rodgers if he had no chance?

Also, why are Liverpool interviewing this many people (supposedly?). Get the impression they don't really have much of an idea.
 
I dunno, seems uninformed and disorganised to me. I'd have hoped they had somebody in mind if I was a Liverpool fan, or at least less than 10 people or whatever has been said by the journalists
 
Uninformed and disorganised to have so many candidates, it isn't normal to have so many, and so many different managers with different styles and ideas. It seems like the owners are waiting to be told what they want rather than knowing beforehand.
 
People need to start treating football management like any other management. The owners are asking a broad range of managers what THEY would do IF they had the job, better than arbitrarily picking a manager to be favourite, when later on it turns out their great idea is to bring the great long ball football back to Liverpool.

What if Capello gets interviewed and says, I want a 50mil budget, I think Gerrard and Caragher should go, and I want more wages available, then another manager, AVB says Gerrard will become the focal point of the team, Carroll and Downing should go, he wants to play a high line, attacking football, needs a left winger, left back, thinks Henderson can come good, wants cover for Lucas, and needs 3 more players to cope with Europa league footie.

One manager just asks for bog standard stuff, one manager seems to know Liverpool, knows what they need, knows how to fix the team, knows what the fans want.

It's like a CEO/manager in any other business, research the team, know what is required.

Deciding arbitrarily to appoint "a name" without knowing if they know the players on your team, know what they'd do or have the same ambitions, targets, goals as you is madness.

You get those answers by interviewing managers, simple as that.

Barcelona interviewed Mourinho, and didn't like his attitude and hired someone else, the arbitrarily making some big name your target and getting them at all costs..... well look at Chelsea, you end up with managers who don't share the same idea's as the owners.

If Roman went out and interviewed a dozen managers, would he have gotten someone better 8 years ago who might still be there now?
 
DM I'm pretty sure the just appointed Dalglesih because the fans seem to know his name....

The club must have learnt its lesson by now and wont appoint someone just because the papers have said the name so much... (though not fingers crossed as it is funny to see 120m quid being wasted in football like that...)
 
Back
Top Bottom