Dark matter discovered

Fenris · 18 Dec 2009 at 14:59

LOAM said:
http://www.thesasclan.co.uk/uploads/Stalker/DM.jpg

I love you.

Alex_6n2 · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:03

There is no conclusive proof yet..... The results COULD indicate dark matter.... but it could also just be that piece of toast the guy lost in the detector last week.

4T5 · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:03

james.miller said:

Excellents time for the Sillyness. :cool:

LOAM said:
Exploded or Imploded malc, think hard your answer may save us all if this is indeed the beginning of the new big bang ?

And did you eat anything dark for dinner ?

Imploded - Black hole imminent !!!

Last time I eat an After eight before mid day that's for sure.

w11tho · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:03

*Moangroan* said:
Why would it be earth shattering. Because of mans ego of how things work, and humankind's stoneage science is just that, stoneage.

Now are we going to take our stoneage science and mess around with something we do not know anything about...yeah sure we have big ego to stroke.

What? Seriously, what?

malc30 said:
I Love things that can't be proven by the Greatest minds alive.
Theories are Superb but just that "Theories" I Love it.

But it is impossible to do anything other than theorize. The rôle of the physicist is to observe and predict. They develop models that agree with observed phenomena. It's not like they're searching for some God book in which the real laws of physics are written.

4T5 · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:05

w11tho said:
What? Seriously, what?

But it is impossible to do anything other than theorize. The rôle of the physicist is to observe and predict. They develop models that agree with observed phenomena. It's not like they're searching for some God book in which the real laws of physics are written.

You remind me of a lecturer I once knew that went around in circles saying what somebody had just said.
Never could work out why. :confused:

Kenai · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:05

Oh no, it's happening, just like mattheman said, it is having unwanted affects on Hitler already!

He has somehow become augmented with the dark matter.

We should never have messed around with this stuff guys, if only we had listened.

jak731 · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:07

mattheman said:
Think if we played around with it we altered a certain part of it, the skeleton structure changes form setting of a chain reaction causing a pull event.

I don't think you are taking on board anything I or anyone else has said. You have not made a single cohesive argument.

What you are saying is not justifiable because of the way the detectors work. They try to observe an interaction, and have to wait for an interaction to happen, which would happen whether or not they were looking.

w11tho · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:09

malc30 said:
You remind me of a lecturer I once knew that went around in circles saying what somebody had just said.
Never could work out why.

Was my post unclear?

The Dread Pirate · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:09

Fenris said:
Maybe if we hit it with an inverse tachyon beam...

GOD DAMNIT JIM I'M A DOCTOR NOT A QUANTUM PHYSISCIST!

Ziggy · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:12

w11tho said:
rôle

Unless you are French, :/

Cosimo · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:12

neil3k said:
Can we have a poll to get mattheman renamed to RSSMAN

Try asking here:

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18091989

w11tho · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:29

Ziggy said:
Unless you are French, :/

The use of the circumflex is perfectly acceptable. I'm afraid I don't know what the expression ":/" means, so it's difficult to judge what you were getting at.

Margaret · 18 Dec 2009 at 15:43

mattheman said:
do you think messing around with this could cause the big bang 2?

mrk · 18 Dec 2009 at 16:07

A singularity is what more than likely caused the big bang that created our Universe.

How would we "mess" with dark matter this side of the 21st century in a manner to cause a singularity?

There's more chance of the world being sucked into a black hole from the LHC spooling up to 100%

Anyway, it's something nobody on Earth understands yet and like the centre of a black hole, none of the current laws govern it (relativity and quantum mechanics) so we'll need new theorists, modern Einsteins, to jot down new equations that govern new physics before any of this "Earth shattering" takes place!

Mattheman will be a pile of bones by then ¬_¬

4T5 · 18 Dec 2009 at 16:41

w11tho said:
Was my post unclear?

Nope just not neccessary.

w11tho · 18 Dec 2009 at 16:53

It's certainly not necessary for you to understand what physicists do, but I thought you might like it clarifying (as your comments suggested you were unaware).

4T5 · 18 Dec 2009 at 17:01

w11tho said:
It's certainly not necessary for you to understand what physicists do, but I thought you might like it clarifying (as your comments suggested you were unaware).

You obviously mis understood my second post, What I meant was you just repeated exactly what others had posted for no reason.
You proved my supposed wannabe lecturer/Intelectual theory though by correcting my spelling.

w11tho · 18 Dec 2009 at 17:05

malc30 said:
You obviously mis understood my second post, What I meant was you just repeated exactly what others had posted for no reason.

Ah, I see. I can't find another post explaining to you what physicists do - happy for you to point it out though!

malc30 said:
You proved my supposed wannabe lecturer/Intelectual theory though by correcting my spelling.

Erm, I haven't corrected your spelling. Are you reading the same thread?

4T5 · 18 Dec 2009 at 17:08

w11tho said:
Erm, I haven't corrected your spelling. Are you reading the same thread?

Necessary

I think you are not reading the same thread my freind, I gotta crash anyways I got work in a bit.

w11tho · 18 Dec 2009 at 17:11

malc30 said:
Necessary
I think you are not reading the same thread my freind, I gotta crash anyways I got work in a bit.

Words are italicized to add emphasis - I was not correcting your spelling.