Associate
Minimum of 28 years.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-48967618
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-48967618
Yeah, because both cases are so similar.Interesting that if you're from a privileged background, stabbing someone in the chest and then lying to police is self defence
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-48962845
Interesting that if you're from a privileged background, stabbing someone in the chest and then lying to police is self defence
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-48962845
Exactly, it's not so... black and whiteBoth are bad but one was kids going tooled up to rob someone then getting in a fight with each othet.. both had knives and one got stabbed and died. The other was a verbal argument then a hyper aggressive 18 puncture stabbing against an unarmed man...... there is a hell of a difference in these cases
Interesting that if you're from a privileged background, stabbing someone in the chest and then lying to police is self defence
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-48962845
Exactly, it's not so... black and white
Det Ch Insp Sam Blackburn, from British Transport Police described the killer as "devious and dangerous".
He said: "Quite clearly with his previous convictions, where he also stabbed another man in the neck, and his propensity for carrying knives, he showed his dangerous, aggressive nature and that he wasn't afraid to use that knife on that train."
Take straight from BBC...
The court heard Pencille, who declined to give evidence during his trial, had 14 previous convictions for 19 different offences over a 19-year period, including possession of offensive weapons, violence and dishonesty.
Shouldn't have been walking the streets
That is the thing that bugs me about many of theses cases, the thug involved inevitable has a violent history. The main thing prison is useful for us keeping violent people away from the rest of us, if a violent offender is caught with an offensive weapon then they should get a serious sentence likewise if they have a repeat violent incident then ditto.
At this point I think this is the best approach but someone needs to have the backbone to stand up to those soft liberal types who cry racism and discrimination when such tactics are used.Stop and search. Jail for carrying.
Wat???
Bit of a difference when the victim also allegedly had a knife and apparently pulled his knife out first. Not to mention them calling 999 afterwards and trying to save him. That was either manslaughter or self defence depending on whether you believe the story and the manslaughter would probs not be beyond reasonable doubt.
I think in both cases the killer should be done for murder, manslaughter at the minimum, not literally getting away with murder though
Big guy pushes arguemt too far
Little guy feels threatened,
Little guy pulls knifs to make big guy back off
Big guy sees knife and tables are turned
Fight or flight kicks in and knowing flight is no option big guy fights
Little guy who would never stab anyone has no choice but to stab..
Stad someone once and nothing much happens.. Panic sets in and he keeps doing it
Probably tragic event.. Or maybe little guy just felt a little stabby and was out to murder anyway..
London seems to be getting more and more dangerous with all these stabbings.