David Cameron looking to ban gay kisses...

OMG thats is a sensible answer .


How would you know I am an idiot purely based up on a few sentances on a web forum ?

Its simple , I dont agree with public diplays of homosexuality and think David Cameron is correct in everything he says in this article .

Seems there are a lot of Fag Hags in this forum , maybe I should turn over.

Because you say things like that. It is all the indication that anyone would need of your mental capacity, which is clearly dangerously low.

There are a wide variety of medical professionals, competant and otherwise, who would be willing to take a look at you. I suggest you seek them out for an extended therapy session.

Right, because a man and woman kissing is the same as a man/man woman/woman.

No, it is different. But only that they're of the same gender.
 
"You see 7 year old, some men and women don't like their opposites and instead prefer to kiss people who are their own gender, its not common but it isn't wrong if that is how someone feels when they grow up"

Where is the problem with that?

Oh wait, your saying being homosexual is unnatural, care to source your information? I as a straight man am fascinated that something I have very little first hand knowledge of has been shown to be unnatural because everything I have come across says otherwise.

Source my information , unnatural ?

Since when was homosexuality a part of the natural evolution of mankind? Unless your about to tell me that playing hide the sausage with another man can now produce babies ?

I have chosen to bring my children up in a loving Christain family enviroment and If I choose to not let my children see men or women kissing on the telly or in public than that is my choice . I am glad the David Cameron is considering this.
 
Yes, that's why I said you were biased. :rolleyes:
Then you are just as biased in this argument because you are straight.
And as to your last little pitiful whine about how you are an endangered species, I don't think that's the case.

As anti it as I may be, I'm not going to burn you at the stake. In fact you as a human should have the same rights as me, you just shouldn't be trying to get it on the same par as hetrosexuality.
Get :rolleyes: what :rolleyes: on :rolleyes: the :rolleyes: same :rolleyes: par :rolleyes: as :rolleyes: 'hetrosexuality'?
 
I have chosen to bring my children up in a loving Christain family enviroment and If I choose to not let my children see men or women kissing on the telly or in public than that is my choice . I am glad the David Cameron is considering this.

So, you're against homosexuality, but you're okay in teaching your kids that a large proportion of people, including their friends and family are going to suffer eternal damnation?

I bow to your superior morality.
 
Father "you see young boy, some men like other men......."

Boy "eww, that's gross"

If a kid tells you you eww when they hear that, then you know that its not normal and the kids reaction is telling the truth.

Kids think kissing in general is gross, they don't really form an opinion until the hormones get going later on in life.

I'd wager that some of the posters in this form would disown their children if they happened to be gay later on in life, and part of me wants to say that that's sad, but most of me wants to say that it and them are pathetic.
 
Kids think kissing in general is gross, they don't really form an opinion until the hormones get going later on in life.

I'd wager that some of the posters in this form would disown their children if they happened to be gay later on in life, and part of me wants to say that that's sad, but most of me wants to say that it and them are pathetic.

It's both.
 
My daughter thinks mushrooms are gross, to follow the line from the post above.

Also, children invariably only repeat what they are told when it comes to things they don't understand. Most adults, too, for that matter.

Yes possibly could have been influenced or heard it somewhere else.

But if you kids comes home and starts telling you Johnny's dad was kissing a bloke in the school playground at home time.

Do you think David Cameron may have a point.
 
Can you explain how it's different?

Here's some advance warning - the trap that you are going to fall in is that you are going to reveal your prejudices rather than making an objective argument. Try to avoid doing that.

Because the point of us as humans is procreation, whether we believe this from a religious point point of view (marriage) or from a non religious viewpoint (continuation of species).

Also there are lots of issues associated with homosexuality, such as the natural viewpoint of people "eww etc etc", health risks, and mental health problems (which admittedly isn't helped by traditional discrimination).

In an ideal world you would want your child to grow up straight so that they can lead a life which can have some degree of personal productivity (children etc), and not have to suffer being a "minority".
 
So, you're against homosexuality, but you're okay in teaching your kids that a large proportion of people, including their friends and family are going to suffer eternal damnation?

I bow to your superior morality.

I don't believe most people are going to suffer eternal damnation. I believe in a merciful God.


And yes that does extend to gays as well. :rolleyes:
 
Since when was homosexuality a part of the natural evolution of mankind? Unless your about to tell me that playing hide the sausage with another man can now produce babies ?

Pretty sure I recall one poster in another "I hate gay people" thread mentioning that there is a possible link between genes that may express as homosexuality in males and the same genes expressing as an increase in fertility in females. Though truth be told the whole genetics side of things is pretty much unknown at the moment.

I have chosen to bring my children up in a loving Christain family enviroment and If I choose to not let my children see men or women kissing on the telly or in public than that is my choice .

God help them if they turn out to be gay then eh?

I am glad the David Cameron is considering this.

Bad luck for you that he isn't then isn't it?
 
Source my information , unnatural ?

Since when was homosexuality a part of the natural evolution of mankind? Unless your about to tell me that playing hide the sausage with another man can now produce babies ?

I have chosen to bring my children up in a loving Christain family enviroment and If I choose to not let my children see men or women kissing on the telly or in public than that is my choice . I am glad the David Cameron is considering this.
Since when was everything natural and normal part of the evolution of mankind? I like drum and bass but I'm fairly sure the physical evolution of our species is not hinged on it.

Oh, and I think you're a pretty bad parent. You seem to be all about the indoctrination. You want them to be free thinking, yet you are creating a very closed set of boundaries for them to think in. How does that work?
 
Because the point of us as humans is procreation, whether we believe this from a religious point point of view (marriage) or from a non religious viewpoint (continuation of species).

Also there are lots of issues associated with homosexuality, such as the natural viewpoint of people "eww etc etc", health risks, and mental health problems (which admittedly isn't helped by traditional discrimination).

In an ideal world you would want your child to grow up straight so that they can lead a life which can have some degree of personal productivity (children etc), and not have to suffer being a "minority".

In my ideal world I would want my children to grow up being good people. Their sexuality, if they choose to have kids, none of that is important. Happy and healthy, and to live their lives how they choose.

Kids are not employees that need to grow up following your exact plan lest they be 'fired'.
 
Also there are lots of issues associated with homosexuality, such as the natural viewpoint of people "eww etc etc", health risks, and mental health problems (which admittedly isn't helped by traditional discrimination).

In an ideal world you would want your child to grow up straight so that they can lead a life which can have some degree of personal productivity (children etc), and not have to suffer being a "minority".

Health risks? Gays have more risks than straight people? And the mental health problem are only a result of the discrimination! If it was as normal as being straight then.. what mental health problem would there be that would go for gay people only?

I couldn't care less if my kids turn out gay as long as they are happy.
 
Yes possibly could have been influenced or heard it somewhere else.

But if you kids comes home and starts telling you Johnny's dad was kissing a bloke in the school playground at home time.

Do you think David Cameron may have a point.

No. Just as if my kids come home and say that Johnny's dad and mum were kissing.

Because the point of us as humans is procreation, whether we believe this from a religious point point of view (marriage) or from a non religious viewpoint (continuation of species).

That's a very narrow view. We as humans have progressed far beyond the basic need to survive. Art, music, philosophy, love are all extrenuous to survival, yet we devote much of our time. Many people consider art as a form of procreation anyway, with our ideas, thoughts and essence transcending time. So unfortunately your point doesn't hold much water.

Also there are lots of issues associated with homosexuality, such as the natural viewpoint of people "eww etc etc", health risks, and mental health problems (which admittedly isn't helped by traditional discrimination).

The 'natural' viewpoint is something that is propagated by the anti-homosexual attitude. Just like interracial coupling, which admittedly still has it's fair amount of prejudice. The health risks are minimal as long as you practice the sex side of it safely, just like with heterosexual couples you practice safe sex. I'd wager that the health risk is an empty point when you consider the amount of abortions or unwanted pregnancies (and the resulting consequences) from heterosexual coupling. And I have no idea what you're talking about with regards to mental health problems, care to clarify?

In an ideal world you would want your child to grow up straight so that they can lead a life which can have some degree of personal productivity (children etc), and not have to suffer being a "minority".

In an ideal world you would want your child to grow up to be what they want to be, not what you want them to be. You'd want your child to be happy, regardless if that's gay or straight, religious or non-religious. Anything else is superfluous.
 
Last edited:
In my ideal world I would want my children to grow up being good people. Their sexuality, if they choose to have kids, none of that is important. Happy and healthy, and to live their lives how they choose.

Kids are not employees that need to grow up following your exact plan lest they be 'fired'.

I think every sane person would wish for their children to grow up to be happy, good people.

I (my opinion) think that this would be achieved better for obvious reasons if they were straight.


And don't try and insinuate that I would disown my child, read some of my posts above...
 
what if by explaining to your kid homos, you may influence his sexuality from the normal.

Does that not go to show that homosexuality is a choice ?
 
Father "you see young boy, some men like other men......."

Boy "eww, that's gross"

If a kid tells you you eww when they hear that, then you know that its not normal and the kids reaction is telling the truth.

This has to be trolling or GD has reached yet higher heights!

Explain the idea of kissing a girl and your likely to hear eww, let alone other adult stuff like putting his erect penis into a girls vagina. Have you ever tried giving a child Wine or Beer before? Had a kid watch Fight Club or read The Prince?
 
Back
Top Bottom