days in a year

Burbleflop · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:07

crashuk said:
I hope you see where iam coming from.

I'm pretty sure even you don't.

Freefaller · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:09

crashuk said:
freefall i understand it, but its relating it to a financial calculation, iam trying to explain you cant do the following £650 per month * 12= 7800 / 365 then * 7 = £149.50p. if your going to do it that way then you must the daily figure by 7.44 to give me £150per week. But they are saying no there isnt .4 of a day in week.
I hope you see where iam coming from.

But do you get 7800 in your bank at the end of the year? Or are you saying that you are getting paid £650 a month? If it's the latter, then you're fine - no one works out their salary per day.

benjo plz. · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:10

650 a month and 7800 a year are the same thing...

Kell_ee001 · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:10

Freefaller said:
Must resist.... to... ban... Kelly....

Uh Oh!

Burbleflop said:
I'm pretty sure even you don't.

LMAO

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:10

£650 per month = £7800 per year = £150 per week
Now £7800 per year = using days = £149.50 per week.

cyKey · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:10

Maybe there are 51.9999999 weeks or is that 52?

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:14

Freefaller said:
But do you get 7800 in your bank at the end of the year? Or are you saying that you are getting paid £650 a month? If it's the latter, then you're fine - no one works out their salary per day.

it was meant to be paid monthly £650 but they said they would pay me weekly, so i thought ok its £150 a week, but the way they calculate it, £650 month x 12 months = £7800 then they divide that by 365 days which gives me a daily rate then * that by 7 which gives me a weekly rate and that what goes in the bank.

dymetrie · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:17

crashuk said:
it was meant to be paid monthly £650 but they said they would pay me weekly, so i thought ok its £150 a week, but the way they calculate it, £650 month x 12 months = £7800 then they divide that by 365 days which gives me a daily rate then * that by 7 which gives me a weekly rate and that what goes in the bank.

so you're getting paid £7800 a year... which is what's on your contract...

what's the problem other than your bad maths?

cyKey · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:17

Freefaller said:
Must resist.... to... ban... Kelly....

Nooooo. Don't do it!

I'll never hear the end of it on MSN

DRZ · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:18

crashuk said:
it was meant to be paid monthly £650 but they said they would pay me weekly, so i thought ok its £150 a week, but the way they calculate it, £650 month x 12 months = £7800 then they divide that by 365 days which gives me a daily rate then * that by 7 which gives me a weekly rate and that what goes in the bank.

£149.50 x 52 doesnt work out right BECAUSE THERE ARE NOT 52 WEEKS IN A YEAR!

Do this:

149.50 / 7 * 365.25

What is the result?

Bri · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:19

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:19

dymetrie said:
so you're getting paid £7800 a year... which is what's on your contract...

what's the problem other than your bad maths?

so how can i get £7800 in a year if they are putting in £149.50 per week?

Bri · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:21

crashuk said:
so how can i get £7800 in a year if they are putting in £149.50 per week?

Aaaargh! Because there's not 52 weeks in a year!

DRZ · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:22

crashuk said:
so how can i get £7800 in a year if they are putting in £149.50 per week?

Look at my post above - the reason is in bold and underlined for you. Nice and simple

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:22

i know theres not, that not the issue, the issuse is payment.

Otacon · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:23

dymetrie · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:24

DRZ said:
Look at my post above - the reason is in bold and underlined for you. Nice and simple

/me hugs DRZ

(in a manly non homogay way of course)

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:25

DRZ said:
Look at my post above - the reason is in bold and underlined for you. Nice and simple

but that means i have to be there 3 years to recoup the money.

Otacon · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:26

-westy- said:
Look, the fact of the matter is that 0.999r does not equal 1.

FACT.

Freefaller · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:29

-westy- said:
Look, the fact of the matter is that 0.999r does equal 1. (to a mathematician)

FACT.