Care to elaborate on what the reform should be?Hmm, this doesn't mesh with what this thread has been saying for weeks.....did you guys even pass the bar?
Correct decision. Now the momentum needs to be held to push for reform.
Care to elaborate on what the reform should be?Hmm, this doesn't mesh with what this thread has been saying for weeks.....did you guys even pass the bar?
Correct decision. Now the momentum needs to be held to push for reform.
If they want to destroy their own communite's and shops let them get on with it they only have themselves to blame when the business owners don't come back.Simple solution. Just let blacks get on with committing crime and refuse to arrest them. See how long it takes for people to realise the problem isn't the cops.
The expression in his eyes when that first verdict was read out, was very much "wtf".
Absolutely no way in the world was he guilty of pre-meditated murder. The jury have obviously been influenced by the media/news, if this verdict isn't overturned. America is up a creek without a paddle.
And here we go. One side is happy with the decision and the other side furious.
I don't think the word 'polarised' even justifies the split of people any more
You saw the witness list, I posted it. There were more police on it, they just didn't call them all, they didn't need them.
They're going to have to re-write the training manuals at the very least.
As a white officer encountering a black person who is resisting arrest, it's now going to be a balancing act between doing your job and protecting your own ass from prosecution.
Interesting the BBC the commentators are all now saying, "This is just the start. We want to overhaul policing completely."
Given that a significant number want to abolish the police entirely (lol), this sure is interesting times.
2nd is still intentional though. No idea how they reached that conclusion.second degree murder in the states isn't pre-meditated. That's first degree.
second degree murder in the states isn't pre-meditated. That's first degree.
What's dribble? You think I invented that? Lol, it's been mentioned by several commentators on the BBC, which I imagine you must have seen yourself...What utter dribble
I also see many of the resident OC racists are once again letting their masks slip
I wonder why so many people on this forum said he was not guilty. Was obvious he was guilty.
trickier than if it had been innocent or somewhere between, at least i could believe the jury hadn't been influenced, but this really does raise the question how much of this decision is political rather than the specifics of the trial.
I wonder why so many people on this forum said he was not guilty. Was obvious he was guilty.
I imagine the chances are quite high that a tazer would also have killed Floyd!Probably become more trigger happy with tazer's
2nd is still intentional though. No idea how they reached that conclusion.
Coz he was basically dead and the cop stayed on him. If someone's dying u get off them. That was reckless disregard for life.2nd is still intentional though. No idea how they reached that conclusion.
What's dribble? You think I invented that? Lol, it's been mentioned by several commentators on the BBC, which I imagine you must have seen yourself...