Just to move the discussion on a bit, would you mind saying if you are over or under say 30 years of age? You wouldn't pro actively warn of a speed trap, but what would you do if you , assuming you frequent pubs, saw someone about to drive away who you had seen drinking say 4 or 5 pints? Ignore it? Have a discreet word before they drove off, risking a confrontation? Report them? What if it was someone you knew locally? A friend or relative? Would that matter?
How do you update waze while still driving?![]()
PC Antony Gray, of the road policing unit, said: “People who flash their headlights at other cars to warn them that there are police officers nearby may think they are doing someone a favour but potentially they are putting lives at risk.
“Flashing your lights at someone may make them slow down for just a second, but it will not make them change their habits in the long run.
no need round our way, the police can't be bothered to do anything more than a token van placed at well known locations.
Of course, it's not such a win if all you care about is revenue generation, which sadly is the state of most police forces these days.
Yes and no.
Never read such a load of old crap in my life. By saying the above he's assuming that you're actually flashing someone who is speeding - which is not always the case. Also if the flash causes them to slow down that's a win win right?
Of course, it's not such a win if all you care about is revenue generation, which sadly is the state of most police forces these days.
I understood Flash For Cash refers to those motorists who "flash to let you in" at a turning or something, but then continue on and crash into you on purpose, knowing the road laws favour them and allow them to claim off you...?a very obvious 'flash for cash' mobile speed camera setup
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/617207/Speed-cameras-safety-no-way-make-money-police-admitpolice dont earn anything from speeders afaik.
I understood Flash For Cash refers to those motorists who "flash to let you in" at a turning or something, but then continue on and crash into you on purpose, knowing the road laws favour them and allow them to claim off you...?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/617207/Speed-cameras-safety-no-way-make-money-police-admit
Many more like that. I assume therefore that they get some money out of it...
Neither are The Guardian, Telegraph, Times, Daily Fail, Sun, Independent or any other you'd care to name as a decent or reliable source either, I expect.... and yet there are sources citing officials who've openly admitted how much they're making from speed cameras.express is a far from a decent newspaper![]()
It's really not. At all. Why would it be?