Doctor Who

Soldato
Joined
10 Jan 2012
Posts
3,686
Location
UK
So weird lol
My only issue is the singing voice, why not make it more gobliny like the others. Don't think it fits with the scene.
Also the sonic "screwdriver" just looks stupid it's a tv remote.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
31 Jan 2022
Posts
2,652
Location
UK
I'm not much of a Dr Who fan, really, but David Tennant always seemed to fit the role quite well. I think all too often, the BBC chooses actors based on their appeal to children or because they are suitably woke, and the appeal to adults ends up pretty low, but Tennant was a good compromise. For some reason, the stories seemed better when he was the doctor as well.
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Aug 2007
Posts
29,098
well i really enjoyed that one. Apart from the daft split in two thing and how that will be handled going forward. Even the "do you come in all shapes and colours" line was fine because it fitted in with the character and wasnt just clearly shoehorned in for "the message". The new doctor seems ok if a little hyper. It would be nice to get back to the pertwee / baker days of a little more thoughtfull attitude. But anyway, good finish to it.
Its interesting because over the years the Pertwee version has actually gone up greatly in my estimation, possibly exactly due to that "hyper" nature that you mention, at the time the Pertwee version didnt resonant quite so well with me but after so many hyper/OTT Doctors of recent incarnations I've really come to appreciate the Pertwee version so much more, I actually put that version 2nd only to Baker in my ratings now
 
Soldato
Joined
29 May 2012
Posts
4,304
Location
Glasgow
Its interesting because over the years the Pertwee version has actually gone up greatly in my estimation, possibly exactly due to that "hyper" nature that you mention, at the time the Pertwee version didnt resonant quite so well with me but after so many hyper/OTT Doctors of recent incarnations I've really come to appreciate the Pertwee version so much more, I actually put that version 2nd only to Baker in my ratings now
I'm the same. Pertwee was always my least favourite and would always avoid watching. But now I really enjoy them.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Jun 2009
Posts
741
I'm the same. Pertwee was always my least favourite and would always avoid watching. But now I really enjoy them.

its just a difference in era's. Back in those days the Dr was someone to look up to, a "father figure". The modern iteration is played as the viewers mate. Nothing wrong with that but could be a reason why a lot of mature viewers slate the modern versions, they just want some serious sci-fi. Interestingly, maybe, is that John Pertwee was the same age as David Tennent when he played the doctor. 52.
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Aug 2007
Posts
29,098
its just a difference in era's. Back in those days the Dr was someone to look up to, a "father figure". The modern iteration is played as the viewers mate. Nothing wrong with that but could be a reason why a lot of mature viewers slate the modern versions, they just want some serious sci-fi. Interestingly, maybe, is that John Pertwee was the same age as David Tennent when he played the doctor. 52.
It could well be that yeah, the previous Doctors were very much like Professors, almost Quatermass like, whereas the last 4 or 5 Doctors have been more like Big Brother contestants or super-hyper ADHD sufferers constantly running everywhere and getting overexcited about everything.
 
Associate
Joined
5 Aug 2023
Posts
664
Location
Earth
It could well be that yeah, the previous Doctors were very much like Professors, almost Quatermass like, whereas the last 4 or 5 Doctors have been more like Big Brother contestants or super-hyper ADHD sufferers constantly running everywhere and getting overexcited about everything.

That's because the Doctor's are now kids entertainers/indoctrinators, not serious believable time-lords. That's also because this isn't a serious or even semi-serious Sci-Fi show any more, it's something entirely different.
 
Last edited:

jcr

jcr

Associate
Joined
29 May 2011
Posts
1,816
Location
southampton
That's because the Doctor's are now kids entertainers/indoctrinators, not serious believable time-lords. That's also because this isn't a serious or even semi-serious Sci-Fi show any more, it's something entirely different.
i think the BBC is taking the mickey out of its audience and theyre too dim to realise it.
 
Associate
Joined
23 Jan 2003
Posts
1,762
Location
N.I.
That's because the Doctor's are now kids entertainers/indoctrinators, not serious believable time-lords. That's also because this isn't a serious or even semi-serious Sci-Fi show any more, it's something entirely different.
the BBC has never done SciFi shows well, too many of the top brass look down on Sfi-Fi, it only for baby's and the simple minded
 
Associate
Joined
16 Jun 2009
Posts
741
i'd disagree with that. Tripods, Day of the Triffids, Torchwood, once it found its feet with Children of Earth was some of the best sci fi. But I cant think of much recently.
 
Back
Top Bottom