Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,432
But with very little information on what actually happened, or the events that led to the incident...The tally grows
But with very little information on what actually happened, or the events that led to the incident...The tally grows
But with very little information on what actually happened, or the events that led to the incident...Another attack:
Blaenau Gwent: Girl, 12, has life-changing injuries in dog attack
Two arrests are made after a young girl was left with serious injuries due to the dog attack.www.bbc.co.uk
Weird description in the article ("...arrested on suspicion of owning or possessing a dog bred for fighting") and not clear that it's a banned breed.
Something happened and someone got hurt, but there are no details of what happened or why... Police have released no information beyond a few suspicions, so feel free to guess and infer whatever you like. Long as you keep clicking on our website...Have you noticed the initial reporting of these dog attacks are very similar to knife attacks or initial stages of terror attacks? Who are they protecting from being offended, the XL Bully Appreciation Society?
You can breed any dog with the intent to put it in fights. That doesn't autiomatically make it a banned breed, and they'd still need to confirm the breed anyway.Weird description in the article ("...arrested on suspicion of owning or possessing a dog bred for fighting") and not clear that it's a banned breed.
You can breed any dog with the intent to put it in fights. That doesn't autiomatically make it a banned breed, and they'd still need to confirm the breed anyway.
and they'd still need to confirm the breed anyway.
It's probably just newspapers fudging and conflating their sentences. Dog fighting and breeding with the intent for fighting probably is illegal, though I'd not be surprised to learn it hasn't actually been enshrined in law yet, but that's still not the same as being a banned breed. It's just the media-hyped intimation that any dog of a banned breed was automatically intended for the pits.Yeah, I know. Just never seen that as a charge before!
Then it definitely is.looks like as bully breed of some description to me.
The entire Bully breed was already banned under the 1991 DDA.Regardless of if a lot of them are docile, and even tho its maybe not the dogs fault, i think its neigh on time all of them were banned as pets......
As previously argued, banning one corrupted breed doesn't stop criminals from finding another breed to corrupt, and we've had decades of them doing this already.using the same logic as banning hand guns in the UK......... it sucks for the majority of responsible owners..... but it sucks more for the innocent people who are attacked by the animals.
its a fair point....As previously argued, banning one corrupted breed doesn't stop criminals from finding another breed to corrupt, and we've had decades of them doing this already.
At what point do you either just ban everything, or focus on the root cause of the various problems?
As you say, it's pretty easy to check, but that's not the way the law works.as for the genetic makeup ..... ok if you want to argue you do not think that is primarily a bully breed ok.............
You still have to pay for people and facilities to do the testing, police the licencing, enforce the laws and administrate the whole thing.in theory genetic testing is not that expensive at source (after all we are not talking entire genomes needed) so it could be part of a dog licence if needed testing for certain markers, with every dog owner needing to have a licence.......
do you read our media? that sounds about accurate to be honest.. If that was the standards the press had you would never get any correct information following a news worthy event.
Protecting themselves from people that take offence at what they report then.
I can hardly see an XL Bully (or a Staffie if it's a case of mistaken identity) going after the BBC though for slander. Mind you, there will be lawyers that would take that case on I suppose.
Accuracy and accountability is not about being offended
Guide us to salvation my lord!Look at half the posters here, complete morons who post absolute nonsense
Another one. Quite a toll again this year. 10 is no tiny toddler or baby either. Poor kid.
Give it a try and report back.If a dog jumps at you, even if it's not necessarily being aggressive, is it acceptable to punch the dog?
As a non dog owner and someone who is a bit nervous around dogs (got bit in the hand as a young child) I can't always tell.
I've had dogs jump up at me, the owners are like "don't worry he's only playing".
If I then punch it as hard as I can, then tell the owner "don't worry, I'm just playing" that's ok?
In an ideal world I'd think that ought to be perfectly acceptable.If a dog jumps at you, even if it's not necessarily being aggressive, is it acceptable to punch the dog?
As a non dog owner and someone who is a bit nervous around dogs (got bit in the hand as a young child) I can't always tell.
I've had dogs jump up at me, the owners are like "don't worry he's only playing".
If I then punch it as hard as I can, then tell the owner "don't worry, I'm just playing" that's ok?