Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2016
- Posts
- 4,261
- Location
- Third Earth
Irony, thy name is...Honeybadger?!
I can see you're the observant one, well done. Have a cookie and play nice.
Last edited:
Irony, thy name is...Honeybadger?!
<snip>
<snip>
Sounds great, me too by the way, lots of experience with this. Yet you seem to have taken umbridge with my posts, despite us seemingly having the same outlook and only wish to care for our animals.
however if someone continues to approach me despite me asking/warning them not too, then they have more to worry about than my GSD.
There's only so much you can reasonably do, though, and if people really are THAT willing to be so ******* retarded, then either your dog is going to end up being put to death for behaving perfectly naturally, or YOU have to step in and prevent it.All I find unreasonable is the "If they ignore it, it's on them"
Okay then, smartarse - Tell us all what YOU would do in that situation, eh?I can think of many innocent situations where even a responsible owner of a well behaved dog may not see your sign or clearly hear/understand your verbal instruction and nothing will convince me that just approaching you/your dog is grounds for violence.
There's only so much you can reasonably do, though, and if people really are THAT willing to be so ******* retarded, then either your dog is going to end up being put to death for behaving perfectly naturally, or YOU have to step in and prevent it.
Okay then, smartarse - Tell us all what YOU would do in that situation, eh?
You have an owner utterly ignoring your warnings, and a dog bounding over, moments away from invading the safe space of your own distressed dog.
What is your stunning idea for dealing with it?
I wasn't talking about retarded owners deliberately ignoring, when my dog is off the lead he's often 20+M away exploring/foraging, but will come back under recall and is well trained and under control at all times, however if HB was 20+M away I'd probably not see his sign, I'd probably not clearly hear or understand him shouting (as owners are shouting instructions to their dogs all the time), and my dog being normally social would probably start to approach his dog.. does that warrant violence if I haven't seen the sign or heard/understood the yelling?I can think of many innocent situations where even a responsible owner of a well behaved dog may not see your sign or clearly hear/understand your verbal instruction and nothing will convince me that just approaching you/your dog is grounds for violence.
If you cannot read a yellow jacket from 20 metres away, you need new glasses.I wasn't talking about retarded owners deliberately ignoring, when my dog is off the lead he's often 20+M away exploring/foraging, but will come back under recall and is well trained and under control at all times, however if HB was 20+M away I'd probably not see his sign, I'd probably not clearly hear or understand him shouting (as owners are shouting instructions to their dogs all the time), and my dog being normally social would probably start to approach his dog.. does that warrant violence if I haven't seen the sign or heard/understood the yelling?
Who's to say your dog would be the one getting aggressive first?1. Muzzle the dog - If I can't control every situation and know that inevitably a dog may approach whether it's owner is responsible or not (as I said, I can think of lots of scenario's where it's bound to happen without malice), and based on the fact my dog will have a bad reaction, I would not want it able to escalate it to a fight, remembering that it's my dog that would get aggressive first.
Again, not always an option, especially given the price of some such spaces.2. If I truly lived in an area where all other owners where morons but me, I'd not take the dog out in public and find a private space.
Firstly, yes that often is the only answer, especially in the case of dogs needing rehabilitation, training, socialisation and so on.No one wants their dog to be stressed, that's a very bad thing, but the answer isn't to put it deliberately out in a public space and rely on everything else perfectly responding to you if one little hiccup makes you feel like you'd end up in a situation you would need to enact violence on another dog..
You are missing the point entirely so I’ll leave you to it.<snip>.
Letting a dog off a lead on farmland with livestock about.Awful.![]()
Letting a dog off a lead on farmland with livestock about.
Letting a dog off a lead on farmland with livestock about.Stupid bint. She only has herself to blame.
No, I get your point - You don't think it's reasonable... but what you think is ultimately irrelevant, and I did actually speak with a barrister about this last night - End of the day, his dog is on lead, yours is not. If yours goes over to him, your dog is not under control. You are the party at fault.You are missing the point entirely so I’ll leave you to it.
No, I get your point - You don't think it's reasonable... but what you think is ultimately irrelevant, and I did actually speak with a barrister about this last night - End of the day, his dog is on lead, yours is not. If yours goes over to him, your dog is not under control. You are the party at fault.
Again, does not matter what long-winded specific legal advice for your specific dog and its specific circumstances has been given - Yours is on a lead, the one approaching you is not and the owner is not recalling it. The latter is the one with less control being applied.if the advice I was given that I must muzzle the dog whilst out in public due to the legalities from the behavioural therapist was true