One could very much make the case at this point that supporting him raises many alarming questions about a persons ability to stay grounded in objective fact, judge the character of someone, have any integrity, hold some sort of moral compass.
You see the trouble, is that most of the time, arguments FOR Trump are not based on objective facts. This is why he has to lie and flip flop on everything all the time. There is no reasonable argument to be had.
Which is the same position. You phrase it better and you're honest about completely excluding the possibility of a discussion, but it's the same position.
Maybe one of the people who claim that there's an attempt at a discussion somewhere in the >42,000 posts in the other thread will be able to provide an example.