Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
Donald Trump
- Thread starter wez130
- Start date
- Status
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2018
- Posts
- 1,304
The brain rot is strong with this one
Hilarious nonsense.
Wrong, Democrat impeachment manager will be presenting the case in the Senate, and they are free to introduce any new evidence that has since come to light.
This is an impeachment thread and not you echo chamber SC Trump thread.
It's relevant for corruption which many people in DC are involved in.
The 2016 election is relevant as that what was being asked to be investigated (not Hilary, why mention her, I didn't mention her, more derangement on your part it seems).
Lol
. To be fair I don’t think it’s only plasma that needs that website but a few other TDS aka trump supporters in here should have a look at that website.We'll see on that one, i don't object if they do.
Do you at any point understand how the impeachment process works??
While not directed only at you, the transcript does not prove a quid pro qou in relation to the withholding of military aid as the Ukraine stated already that they did not know the aid was on hold and Trump did say they if you don't do XXX, then you don't get the military aid. Biden did that and bragged about it.
Not seen it so cannot comment. Where is his testimony from the impeachment hearings? Let the dems submit it as evidence and the senate decide.
I'm aware of this case, but he was not President when it happened I believe. does not excuse it but you are using this as a deflection tool.
Please provide evidence where i have attacked you?
Does that make the other corrupt politicians OK or better in your view?
Is someone doing 130 mph on the road much worse that someone doing 125 mph even though they broke the same law?
To me they are just as bad. I guess to you if the person doing 130 mph has a criminal history and the other does not, you have to hate the criminal more...
you are slowly getting there, step away from the Trump stuff for a bit and get some fresh air.
I suggest you educate yourself about it then.
Parnas is a first hand witness who was tasked with carrying out the scheme and has admitted that everything Trump has been impeached for is true.
How do you know the transcript does not prove quid pro qou when Trump is hiding it and refusing to let us see an unedited full transcript? Like I asked you before many times and you always skip over the question. If Biden provided a heavily edited transcript with at least half the text missing to clear his name, how would you act? Would you accept it as evidence to clear his name?
As you said yourself this is a Trump thread, this is about Trumps criminal behaviour not Biden. Any criminal behaviour by Biden does not justify Trumps criminal behaviour. Also this weeks evidence there is far more to this then quid pro qou. There are all the others bits like the illegal stalking Trump had done in relation to Ukraine. There is also the case of the illegal Trump foreign money aid which is worse corruption then Biden.
Are you going to answer my question or are they too hard for you?
It not deflecting it proves that Trumps has done despicable acts that are far worse then typical politicians and far worse then Biden. It not only justifies my dislike of Trump but it shows Trump has a history of high levels of corruption and anyone who has a history of high levels of corruption should be watched closely. But you come across as thinking its ok for someone to have high level of corruption and then be left along to cause more corruption. Trump isn’t being investigated just because of the political race. He is being investigated due to his history of illegal behaviour and corruption and what looks like on going corruption and illegal behaviour still today.
You say its only because of the left and dems but if that was true then why are the FBI and separately the Ukraine investigating Trump for illegal behaviour and corruption? Both of those have nothing to do with the left or dems. We have first hand people directly involved in this saying its real, we have Ukraine investigating because it looks real yet you refuse to even think about the possibility it might be real? What if it is real and what if it is worse then Biden? Don't you think that needs investigating?
Of course the person with a history is worse. The first time can be a one-off mistake and are less likely to do it again. Someone who is a repeat offender is massively more likely to offend again.
You already know the answer to that anyway and its more like the other politicians are doing 5mph over the speed limit on a motorway which is a minor offence in comparison. While Trump is doing 130mph in a 20mph zone next to a school. Which is much worse by Trump then what the other politicians are doing.
Take a look in the mirror.
You have often lied and made false statement and didn’t you in the other thread made false statements about me calling me left and supporting the dems. You also called me deranged just because you didn’t want to accept evidence and facts. Just today you lied and said I ignore the evidence of Biden's .
What are you on about? what has that to do with impeachment?
So its a pretty long list of "crimes" than a POTUS can and should be impeached for.
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,744
What you are expecting is to believe is that all those who gave evidence under oath, including career diplomats, are lying and all those that Trump blocked from giving evidence are telling the truth. That's quite a stretch for anyone to believe, even someone like yourself. The fact is you don't actually care if he's guilty, for what reason I'm not quite sure.
How do you know it does? The impeachment process did not call/subpoena the transcript as it had already been released. You are just buying into the MSM's lies that it does exist. However, Biden has his quid pro quo on video, how can you deny that?
If you really believe there is a different transcript, why has the house of Dems not taken the procedural steps to get it?
In your opinion they are more despicable. I say they are all equally corrupt, so call them all out rather than just the one focused by the deranged left.
You still seem to think that when 2 ppl commit the same crime, they are not equal... This is at the root of the left's hypocrisy. If the guy on the left commits the crime, turn a blind eye, if the guy on the guy on the right commits the crime, crucify him. I'm saying do the same for both, either turn a blind eye to both (don't support that) or crucify them both (preferred option). There fore you are taking the lefts position here 'but. But he's worse!!!!!'.
They probably have, but the Whitehouse has refused to cooperate with the entire enquiry.
Apart from Sonland, none of them provided evidence, only their opinion and second/third hand was aired in a totally partisan process.
If the Dems were genuine, they would have subpoena'd those in the meeting and followed that process through. They chose not to call the witnesses who were actually there.
They haven't as they know the correct process will take too long, probably not give them what they wanted.
This is why the impeachment will fail.
Newsflash.... One the articles is for abuse of power. This is a complete fail.
C'mon, keep up.
So why didn't the Dems impeach him for those then????
The whitehouse refused the subpeona for transcripts and audio recordings. That what the Obstruction of Congress impeachment is.
- Status