Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
RxR said:
There's no merit in confusing what was actually a question for an assertion - no matter how many people made the same mistake. I saw the video piece, and Angilion was factually correct in calling out above that error of observation for what it was. The video evidence still stands. It's the easiest defence lawyers picnic - the slander is obvious.

You needn't answer the question I asked, as you would be at a distinct disadvantage unless you are a very well informed behavioural scientist.
Click to expand...

More word salad and arrogance about having the best understanding. Are you by any chance a very stable genius?
 
Mr Badger said:
More word salad and arrogance about having the best understanding. Are you by any chance a very stable genius?
Click to expand...

Here is a perhaps more relevant question, certainly easy to answer by any software engineer or hardware engineer (it is a tech forum):

If you are required to place a new central control unit (hardware) or kernel (software) in a critical system, and that component has a different embedded API or communication protocol than you or most staff are familiar with, and you are supplied no OEM docs:

Whose responsibility is it to ensure the new component is understood and interfaced with correctly to avoid system malfunction?

A) 'The component itself'?:

OR

B) The engineer whose task it is to ensure the available performance improvements the component can deliver are available.
 
RxR said:
To your first question, no, since first, that is an impossibility. And second, we guard our shared greater system performance by distributing the work of maintaining it by constructive criticism - this is the basis of the historic superiority of our civilization - we achieved and achieve faster adaptation by faster signal feedback systems = faster error correction = more robust system. No-one, no critic and no leader, can be asked to chain themself to the trike of Commit, Emote, Suffer.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure you thought that through before answering, if you had you'd have know that holding those in power to account is not an impossibility, who do you think holds dictators and authoritarian regimes to account, and you were specifically referring to America or similar democratic systems then your idea of democracy is not the same as the commonly held notion of it. Democracy, and particularly holding those in power to account, isn't something that happens every few year, it's an ongoing process.

And what do you even mean when you say "we guard our shared greater system performance by distributing the work of maintaining it by constructive criticism", is that another of your throw words into a hat and see what comes out? Who are "we", what are we "guarding" it against, what metric are you using to measure "performance", what "work" are we "distributing", how and what is it "maintaining", and finally who do you think should judge if criticism is "constructive" or not "constructive"?

You really need to work on your English and/or your communication skills as in case it's escaped your notice what you say often makes little sense, saying "No-one, no critic and no leader, can be asked to chain themself to the trike of Commit, Emote, Suffer." do you mean a trike like this..
wisdom-small-trike-[2]-132151-1-p[ekm]120x120[ekm].jpg

If so what's wrong with someone, a critic, or leader chaining themselves to such a thing, what someone does in their spare time shouldn't be any of our business.
 
@Murphy - either I have made a gross error of phrasing or you have made a gross reading error. And neither was intended.

Far from stating it is impossible to hold those in power to account, I thought I made clear the exact opposite, and supported my view of the necessity of it by the remainder of my post.

My point was (edit: also) this: avoiding error is a shared responsibility. No fanboy or follower can escape their share simply by the kind of dodge like 'but you're the boss. If things don't work sweety tooty it's all your fault'.
 
Last edited:
RxR said:
There's no merit in confusing what was actually a question for an assertion - no matter how many people made the same mistake. I saw the video piece, and Angilion was factually correct in calling out above that error of observation for what it was. The video evidence still stands. It's the easiest defence lawyers picnic - the slander is obvious.

You needn't answer the question I asked, as you would be at a distinct disadvantage unless you are a very well informed behavioural scientist.
Click to expand...
You would have to be pretty stupid or an idiot if your question is "Can we inject disinfectant into the lungs maybe or UV light into the body I dont know Im not a doctor but I have a good you know what" while making circle movements near your head.

You need to think about this properly. He was musing if you could somehow put disinfectant into your body or lungs because disinfectant kills Coronavirus within a minute. And then claiming he was being misquoted by the press and then claim he was being sarcastic when it was pointed out that people could die if they did that.
 
Last edited:
RxR said:
@Murphy - either I have made a gross error of phrasing or you have made a gross reading error. And neither was intended.

Far from stating it is impossible to hold those in power to account, I thought I made clear the exact opposite, and supported my view of the necessity of it by the remainder of my post.

My point was this: avoiding error is a shared responsibility. No fanboy or follower can escape their share simply by the kind of dodge like 'but you're the boss. If things don't work sweety tooty it's all your fault'.
Click to expand...
Right, so how do you think that's done? How are those in power held to account?
 
RxR said:
@Murphy - either I have made a gross error of phrasing or you have made a gross reading error. And neither was intended.

Far from stating it is impossible to hold those in power to account, I thought I made clear the exact opposite, and supported my view of the necessity of it by the remainder of my post.

My point was (edit: also) this: avoiding error is a shared responsibility. No fanboy or follower can escape their share simply by the kind of dodge like 'but you're the boss. If things don't work sweety tooty it's all your fault'.
Click to expand...

It seems to me Trump has been too busy attempting to dismantle the normal controls that exist in the American Constitution, and efforts to surround himself only with people who hold loyalty to him rather than loyalty to the American People. That sense of insecurity in his position which he exhibits is the driver for many of the traits we see (well that, and a place so far on the autistic spectrum he's in the infra-red).

Why don't you list the good points of his presidency? Those that attract you to support him and would ensure you vote for him again (if you could vote for him of course - it's not clear you are an American citizen after all..)
 
Murphy said:
Indulge me, what post was that, it should be easy to provide a link, i wouldn't want to make another gross error and all that.
Click to expand...

No, I cannot. It's after midnight here (past my bedtime), and I haven't learnt how to link anything other than a YouTube video with the forum software. For the same reason (not knowing how) I don't use the multiquote and lots of other features either.
 
ChrisLX200 said:
It seems to me Trump has been too busy attempting to dismantle the normal controls that exist in the American Constitution, and efforts to surround himself only with people who hold loyalty to him rather than loyalty to the American People. That sense of insecurity in his position which he exhibits is the driver for many of the traits we see (well that, and a place so far on the autistic spectrum he's in the infra-red).

Why don't you list the good points of his presidency? Those that attract you to support him and would ensure you vote for him again (if you could vote for him of course - it's not clear you are an American citizen after all..)
Click to expand...

I am not American citizen and have thus no skin in the electoral game, so on that matter my interest or opinion is somewhat academic or irrelevant.

You surmised he is on the spectrum. May I ask what some of the indicators (that you have identified) seem to be?

Edit. Btw I will be unable to reply or give proper consideration to the other questions in your post until tomorrow. I need retire for the evening.
 
Last edited:
Welp, maybe I'll get a genuine response out of @RxR tomorrow to those questions that I asked.

And also maybe world peace will spontaneously break out...
 
RxR said:
No, I cannot. It's after midnight here (past my bedtime), and I haven't learnt how to link anything other than a YouTube video with the forum software. For the same reason (not knowing how) I don't use the multiquote and lots of other features either.
Click to expand...
The beauty of forums is you can take your time so feel free to update me on where you "answered that over 500 posts ago", and I'm sure that for someone as learned as yourself it won't take long to grasp how to post a link, i assume you've grasped how to use copy & paste and as the forum parses links automatically it should be fairly simple.

It's probably best if i don't hold my breath for that though as i suspect you can't do it because you didn't answered that over 500 posts ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom