People are criticising him because he didn't do anything for 4 months. People are criticising him because he's killed 80,000 people.Don't you understand the point he's trying to make, he's responding to the people that criticise him for the number of cases.
If you have lots of tests, you're obviously going to see a higher rate of cases. It's not that hard to understand is it
Don't you understand the point he's trying to make, he's responding to the people that criticise him for the number of cases.
If you have lots of tests, you're obviously going to see a higher rate of cases. It's not that hard to understand is it
To be fair a number of Countries have higher testing rates and lower infections per million.
I'm not sure it's a great comparison anyway but that's not an accurate defence.
That's fine, but if there were no tests we can conclude that the number would be substantially lower
That's fine, but if there were no tests we can conclude that the number would be substantially lower
He is responsible for the extra deaths because he didn't handle the situation as well as he could have and so extra people died. Just like Trump is responsible for the extra deaths and extra job loss's Trump cause only Trump handled the situation massively worse then Boris with Trump causing massive extra deaths and massive extra economic damages.Has Boris killed 33,000 people then?
Failure of words....just lol at his logic. Absolutely insane logic that is.
Taking a piece of your logic, it’s better than the near 90k that Trump indirectly caused the deaths of AmericansHas Boris killed 33,000 people then?
If handling something poorly is murder then the World Health Organisation (and China) are responsible for 303,000 deaths and counting for covering it up and allowing it spread. Why are we still funding the WHO?
I do agree that Boris has been shamefully slow to close the borders and enact quarantine policy but even if he had done it day 1 it was too late because it had been covered up for so long at source.
People are criticising him because he didn't do anything for 4 months. People are criticising him because he's killed 80,000 people.
There is no point for him to make. He's a ******* moron.
He means if they had less testing they’d have less recorded cases. Or, rather, his argument is that they are going to have the most recorded cases by virtue of them having many tests.Failure of words....just lol at his logic. Absolutely insane logic that is.
It’s just so damned insane that you can’t get angry about it, you just got to laugh that this is the best candidate America out in charge of their country 4 yrs ago and will probably do it again.
Taking a piece of your logic, it’s better than the near 90k that Trump indirectly caused the deaths of Americans. Just like indirectly Boris and our govt have caused 33k deaths due to their ineptness.
Sentences like this just don't make people take you seriously. It's an infectious disease, it was probably already in America and spreading when it even became a thing we were realistically concerned about. He put in place a lot of ventilators for a worse case scenario, America has a lot of testing, it's easy to use hind sight and say people should've done things. To go and directly say they are responsible for deaths is deranged.
No matter how much social media capital is available to expend, it won't be enough now. The election is lost, and his legacy is secured, although it'll take a few years to measure just how bad it is. Hopefully history will judge this administration as a benchmark for something, at all costs, to avoid in the future when other extremists emerge as 'popular' candidates.
Not really, tests in themselves don't increase or decrease the number of cases as all they do is provide you with information, it's what you do with that information that's the important part.Don't you understand the point he's trying to make, he's responding to the people that criticise him for the number of cases.
If you have lots of tests, you're obviously going to see a higher rate of cases. It's not that hard to understand is it
If the World Health Organisation (and China) had total authority and control over the worlds health then you'd have a point, however as they don't it just seem you've taken the "world" part in their name a little to literally.If handling something poorly is murder then the World Health Organisation (and China) are responsible for 303,000 deaths and counting for covering it up and allowing it spread. Why are we still funding the WHO?
You mean a bit like if i don't get tested for the clap down the STD clinic i don't have the clap? Or a bit like if i don't get X-ray'ed i don't have a broken leg despite this jaunty angle it's at? Yea, I'm not seeing the logic there.He means if they had less testing they’d have less recorded cases. Or, rather, his argument is that they are going to have the most recorded cases by virtue of them having many tests.
Think about what you've just said and apply it to Trump and his administration and the bare-faced lies they tell to the people every day of the week.Sentences like this just don't make people take you seriously. It's an infectious disease, it was probably already in America and spreading when it even became a thing we were realistically concerned about. He put in place a lot of ventilators for a worse case scenario, America has a lot of testing, it's easy to use hind sight and say people should've done things. To go and directly say they are responsible for deaths is deranged.