OMG, how don't you get this?
Donald Trump
- Thread starter wez130
- Start date
- Status
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2018
- Posts
- 1,304
I gave you the benefit of the doubt originally but now im starting to think you're definitely the kind of person who would read bigleaguepolitics...
Everyone knows he's not being removed from office via the senate, in the 22 pages of this thread literally no one has claimed he's going to be removed from office.
Everyone knows he's not being removed from office via the senate, in the 22 pages of this thread literally no one has claimed he's going to be removed from office.
Is that a personal attack? I don't know as I don't read bigleaguepolitics to know if it's good or bad, I'll take it as bad as it wasn't said in a positive way.
I didn't say he was getting removed from office, that's only one of a wide range of possible outcomes. As I said at the start of this whole crapfest this is all about smearing Trump for the next election. Hillary is still waiting in the wings to run for the Dems for a 3rd time.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2018
- Posts
- 1,304
Your first post was a link to a bigleaguepolitics article, it's a super partisan website setup by former Breitbart writers. That's why i mentioned it, id never even heard about it until you posted the link.
Yes it's about influencing swing voters, im not sure id class it as smearing though as i think the case against Trump with regard to the Ukraine scandal is pretty legit, if you want to know why i think that it's been discussed previously in this thread.
I sincerely hope she doesn't run although id still begrudgingly favor her over Trump... just.
![[FnG]magnolia](/styles/overclockers/avatars/9.png){kind=avatar}
Caporegime
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 28,728
- Location
- Auckland
It's always a giggle seeing the people who can post about Trump in GD and those who can't in Speaker's Corner
Got anything to say about the topic of the thread? Thought not!
Oh, and someone doesn't want to get caught lying under oath is seems: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...Trumps-Senate-impeachment-trial.html#comments
I presume you have just as much outrage for Trump, the WH, the State Department, Pompeo, Mulvaney and Pence - many of which have been subpoenaed? For some reason I am leaning towards - no.
In typical Biden form - he's already awkwardly walked back his previous "no". The difference I would hazard a guess you're going to ignore is that some the examples I gave have been officially subpoenaed, Biden hasn't. Nor will he for now, as McConnell has indicated, due to the GOP wanting no witnesses.
Edit - I see you are very objective when it comes to Trump and American politics....
Last edited:
If he does eventually get subpoenaed I'd hazard a guess the media won't be reporting it as a presumption of guilt as they did with Trump and his government. It's the obvious bias and hypocrisy that is turning people away from the left.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,744
Trump smears himself on a daily basis via his Twitter feed, sometimes hourly. You can't blame his critics for using his stupidity against him, the mans a walking talking disaster with no moral compass.
Because debunked conspiracy theories about Biden are on topic?!
If it's proved beyond doubt that they did something wrong then yes, I don't know much about Mulvaney/pompeo/stade dept so I'll have to read up, but if they are from the Obama State dept then they I could see it - but I don't know enough about it at the moment.
[
Then Trump has him over a barrel.. Biden said this is person(the previous 'no'), without all the speech writers/spinners/perception management people so it's what he thinks.. Now, after the backlash he's had to walk back the statements due to everyone in his campaign telling it'll be best for his 'optics' - he's a slimy git.
Thanks
Also notice how the Russian interference line has been dropped? I could have saved the American people over 2 years if they read my post from what - three years ago?This is the thing that really really winds me up.. People are starting to see just how corrupt the system is, just how utterly deceived they have been for years if not decades!
It's all about context, if you can't follow that then I'm sorry.. IE they, the Dems, spent all this time to get an 'impeachment/not impeachment' only for one of the witnesses to say they won't testify(as it's on record, video of him, saying that he did what they accused Trump of) and Biden knows full well that he will be out of the running if he's caught lying in testimony.. Catch 22 for Biden, damned if he does/damned if he doesn't.
Then sit back and let him make a fool of himself and laugh when/if he loses..
Remember what they did all this impeachment rubbish for - Trump asked the Ukraine President Zelenskiy to look into why the investigation of Biden' son ended, that is all! Must be some powerful secrets the Dems don't want unearthed(Pelosi/Obama/Clinton/Biden/Schiff/Kerry/McCain/etc..), these powerful Dems, and more, are in it up to their necks..
Witness to what?
Was Biden a witness to the phone call trump made to the Ukrainian president? No.
Was Biden involved with the trump administration withholding aid as an immediate result of that phone call? No
Was Biden a witness to aforementioned aid then being suddenly released after the whistle blower complaint? No
Actual witnesses to the events such as Pompeo were barred from testifying by the trump administration.
lmao
Biden has been engaged with corruption in the Ukraine, and because he wasn't a witness to Trump talking about it doesn't make it all disappear; he is the centre of the whole impeachment sham. So anyone in on the call is irrelevant, Trump has every reason to pursue corruption.
You know they've been collecting evidence before Biden even ran?
You're still talking out of your posterier, or at the very least listening to the Q nuts and the nonsense the republican party are putting out.
Biden as has been said so many times before took steps in accordance with government policy, international policy and the policy of the senate and congress to try and stop corruption.
That's not getting involved in corruption, or engaging with it (unless you class law enforcement going after criminals as engaging with crime).
But yeah keep repeating the same tired old nonsense that can be disproved with a 5 minute check of actual news sites and government records if it makes you feel better.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,639
Mate, you are talking to a man that thinks Hilary Clinton is a paedophile who used code to order children from a pizza restaurant...
It’s still unbelievable to me that you still think Trump just says and does things on a whim without any thought or strategy
I’ll remind you of the time nearly 3 years ago when you all said what a conspiracy nutter he was and we were for believing that Obama wiretapped him. You still believe that the Russian investigation wasn’t the result of an entrapment and spying campaign, and ignore the FISA findings that they withheld exculpatory info that Carter Page wasn’t a Russian informant, they lied and you guys keep repeating the same lies and I’m the conspiracy theorist...
Also amazes me why you blindly believe that every Democrat is beyond reproach and are so squeeky clean, there’s zero thought given that they couldn’t possibly be involved in corruption. Even though Giuliani has been doing his own investigation work for over a year now, has stacks of documents proving money laundering/slush funds, and lots of Ukranians willing to testify under oath about what was going on.
https://mobile.twitter.com/michaelcoudrey/status/1194782001422721024
These leaks just tip of the iceberg.
Funny how they were all getting rich from ‘oil companies’ with no experience. Imagine if this was Trump’s family, you’d be going nuts
I’ll remind you of the time nearly 3 years ago when you all said what a conspiracy nutter he was and we were for believing that Obama wiretapped him. You still believe that the Russian investigation wasn’t the result of an entrapment and spying campaign, and ignore the FISA findings that they withheld exculpatory info that Carter Page wasn’t a Russian informant, they lied and you guys keep repeating the same lies and I’m the conspiracy theorist...
Also amazes me why you blindly believe that every Democrat is beyond reproach and are so squeeky clean, there’s zero thought given that they couldn’t possibly be involved in corruption. Even though Giuliani has been doing his own investigation work for over a year now, has stacks of documents proving money laundering/slush funds, and lots of Ukranians willing to testify under oath about what was going on.
https://mobile.twitter.com/michaelcoudrey/status/1194782001422721024
These leaks just tip of the iceberg.
Funny how they were all getting rich from ‘oil companies’ with no experience. Imagine if this was Trump’s family, you’d be going nuts
Last edited:
More lies.
Human trafficking among elites doesn’t exist? Oh wait what happened with Epstein. You were probably the first to call that whole thing a conspiracy
Yet you think a man who had to pay $25m to settle a scam university case, pay a $2m fine for illegally taking money from a charity, admitted he’d take dirt from a foreign country to help him in an election, hired his unqualified kids to government positions, has a history of scamming contractors, hasn’t paid most of the cities he’s held rallies in, pumps god knows how much tax payer money into his businesses, tries to hold a G7 summit at his property, etc etc cares about corruption. He cares about one thing - himself.
His kids are making millions from his presidency. Ivanka’s getting all sorts of patents approved, including for voting machines. You’d be foaming at the mouth If the child of a Democrat did anything similar.
If Trump is so squeaky clean, why is he fighting so hard to hide his tax returns? Why is he blocking everyone from testifying under oath? Why is he blocking evidence from being released? The people that are saying he’s not done anything wrong won’t say it under oath, why is that?
- Status