I've also sent an email to the MSI CEO and referenced this thread more than a week ago, not a response from them, they couldn't are less if you ask me.
Yea hopefully we don't need a 300+ page forum thread like the USA to get some faster action.
I've been promised a price next week, but if I don't get it or it's not good enough then I think a few of us should join up and launch a join complaint to the relevant parties...
Also we perhaps need to try and make the maximum people aware of this issue, some owners are probably not aware they are getting ripped or even aware they are doing the trade in...
I just hate this idea of an "individual" offer, it should be a fixed price if you have model A then to upgrade to model B = X amount - that way, no one gets a better price (I'm assuming the more you contest/argue the better price you will get) however some consumers, especially british people don't complain enough to get what they are entitled too, sure they grumble but only to themselves usually....
I don't dispute that
My point is, someone must have asked the cost. Regardless of any claim of what they can do, they could say its any price so I would have expected someone/anyone would have asked that before buying something as expensive
To me, asking would make sense, my point is surely someone did
I mean it literally could be any price until someone asked
How did you get on with Trading Standards/Citizens Advice?
Seems a bit crap of them to not help at all, I assumed this is exactly what they were there for
eh why is it down to the retailer?
MSI promised to deliver something, they can't so they should fix it correct?
It wasn't like the retailer promised to provide it without asking MSI first?
Just so we are 100% clear, at no time have I or MSI refused to offer you or any one wishing to partake in the trade up programme details of what your offer will be.
How does that relate to advertising standards?
Hello MISJAH, I can see that you continue your fight, kudos to you
I finally received the personalized trade-in offer from MSI.
From my perspective, it looks pretty honest but maybe I'm falling in the right bracket somehow. I would be ****ed off if I was not anymore in the 2 year warranty period, I think this is not very fair to take in account only the ones that are still in their 2 years warranty period as you can perfectly want to upgrade your graphic card after 2 years.
I bought my GT72 1699 pounds here on Overclockers more than 2 years ago (October 2014), quite basic config with 970m.
As I sent my request to them before the end of a period of 2 years (I think around September), they consider a discount for me of 1019 pounds against the sent in of my GT72, which is pretty fair, few chances I would have sold my laptop today for such a price second hand. As I want to buy a 1899 pounds GT72VR laptop to replace, it means that I will have to pay 880 pounds for the new laptop which is fair enough in my view.
The new laptop will have a far better graphic card, a newer processor, a PCIe SSD, a G-sync screen (mine did not)...
Overall, I cannot really complain in my case. Surely they could do better...or worse...
BTW, prices of the trade-in offer new laptops are VAT included ?
They are charging me 880 pounds for a much better graphic card, a better processor, a G-sync screen, a PCIe SSD and an overall new laptop that will come with 2 years warranty, sounds pretty OK to me.
Again, I'm maybe kind of lucky because my laptop was a basic one and within just the limit of my 2 years warranty.
Honestly, I'm not sure at all I would have been able to sold a 970m MXM graphic cards second hand ... I would not have had a lot of quids against it. Yeah if you take all these costs separately, the cost of the upgrade would have been a bit lower if it was just upgrading the graphic with the thinking you would sold the old 970m at a decent price. But this is a bit ideal world. In reality, I would not have sold easily my 970m which is now outdated with the new Pascal GPU. and this lost overall is compensated by the fact that I will have new laptop with latest technologies. Again, I cannot see too much ground to complain..in my case.
Where I find MSI certainly unfair is to do this trade in program only on the warranty period, I think they should extend to all users, warranty or not, with proof of receipt in your name.
I do agree, we should not need to buy a new laptop as these laptops were advertised as upgradable. But there has been a **** up from MSI, they certainly recognized it.
Ultimately, they could do better than that but I perfectly understand as well that they cannot sell their new computers for nothing, they do not want to lose money here.
Buying my old GT72 for 1019 pounds (discount I have on the new GT72) is not bad for me.
You are being unfair now, PCIe SSD is clearly beating SATA ssd in terms of speed(and lets not forget that SATA SSD wont see any improvement in the future, PCIE SSD yes), latest generation of processors are always a bit better than the previous ones and have some new features.
Yeah I heard the argument about the 4 SSDs in previous version of the GT72. Tbh, I always had only 1 ssd, never bought more so I'm fine with only 1 PCIe SSD that is as quick as a RAID of 4 SATA SSD. For the mux swich, I have not read too much about it, how it is on the new platform ? Same as before ? IT is fine with me if it is, I was always on the main graphic anyway, never changed to the integrated one.
Again, nothing against you huh, I understand the anger but I have to admit that what they are proposing to me is kind of fair in my own perspective.
Its good to see that someone is happy enough with the offer though.
Barthelemy56 said:I honestly think that I'm not doing such a bad deal at the end. I do not think that MSI is screwing me up on this one.
How much is a 1070 laptop card anyways?
Hard to find info, the only one I can see is $1000 which seems nuts, before tax etc as well
Here is a proper benchmark (and there is certainly a lot of other solid benchmark) :
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Haswell-vs-Skylake-S-i7-4790K-vs-i7-6700K-641/
DDR4 is for now underused but will be usefull in the future, it has always been like this for RAM, when the new RAM is coming out, It takes time to deliver its full power.
For the loading time, make the calculation yourself, if you have 1 SATA SSD at 500MB/s and 1 PCIe SSD at 1000MB/s, it is twice quicker, as simple as that.
I'm also gaming and waiting 30 seconds instead of 15 seconds between 2 games makes a difference to me. You do not buy that sort of computer if you do not care about timing. I love the reactivity of a computer, I love my computer starting in 10 seconds and if it can do it in 5 seconds, it is even better.
What feature (s) there is not in the GT72VR that there is in the GT72 ?
Ha and Ho, I'm going from a non VR capable platform to a VR capable platform.
A last thing : You are showing me prices for some 970m MXM, I would be surprised if I was having more than 150 pounds for my 970m unfortunately, even more since the Pascal GPUs are around. Guys who can upgrade to the 9xx series will upgrade to a 980m which is just VR capable but not the 970m, no point, there will be extremely few clients for these ones unfortunately.
I feel their offer to me is fair
Anyway, I will stop here, I won't convince you and you won't convince me, we have to agree to disagree.
Misjah
What do you think of my supposed deal?
Neil agreed to a call at 6pm let u know