• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

E5200 Overclocking and performance comparison.

nikzGfx said:
Installed the e5400 along with the CM hyper 212, not fully had a chance to play with it but got it sitting on 3.8ghz at the mo.

b51s1y.jpg


Will play with it over the weekend. Might see what I can pull out otherwise I'll be happy to stick with 3.8ghz or lower at a lower core voltage. Feels fast enough for my needs anyway.
Click to expand...

What motherboard is that with??
 
great read :) enjoyed learning a hell of a lot of new stuff, i used to have a E2160 as my original stock cpu before my own build, i never imagined it could get too 3.6ghz! O.o i thought anything over 2.8-3 would make it explode lol
 
MikeTimbers said:
What motherboard is that with??
Click to expand...

Using a Gigabyte P35-DS3L, previous E2160 struggled to get past 2.9GHz on that! Now this E5400 has had no issues reaching 3.8GHz although still not had a chance to push it further but at the mo happy with performance.

Assimilator1 said:
Lol

nikzGfx
Nice overclock with a low vcore too! :cool:
Done any stress testing with it?


Nice deal! :D

So did it die from folding? or fan death?
Click to expand...

Yup done Linx, Prime95 & Orthos. Prefer Linx for some reason as within minutes you'll know if there are any issues. Left Prime for 24 hours, tested Orthos overnight.
 
nikzGfx said:
Using a Gigabyte P35-DS3L, previous E2160 struggled to get past 2.9GHz on that! Now this E5400 has had no issues reaching 3.8GHz although still not had a chance to push it further but at the mo happy with performance.
Click to expand...



You have to remember that the E2160 is also coming from a lot further behind the E5400 as well, 1.8Ghz compared to the E5400's 2.7Ghz. 2.9Ghz is still a good clock for a E2160. If you look at it another way they have both reached overclocks of 1.1Ghz each.
 
Assimilator1 said:
Very true, & aren't the E2xxx series on the 65nm process too?
Whereas the E5x00 are on 45nm, generally allowing for better clock speeds.
Click to expand...

Yep. 65nm and a bit hotter running too. The E2140 i used in the tests needed 1.472v for 3.6Ghz. I am only using 1.32v for 4.13Ghz on my Q9550. I would add it to the test but don't have the same components anymore so it would be uncomparable to the rest.
 
1 last F@H question;), re running time, I meant total time, weeks/months/yrs?

pastymuncher said:
Yep. 65nm and a bit hotter running too. The E2140 i used in the tests needed 1.472v for 3.6Ghz. I am only using 1.32v for 4.13Ghz on my Q9550. I would add it to the test but don't have the same components anymore so it would be uncomparable to the rest.
Click to expand...
Now I really want your Q9550! :D
......don't worry, I can't afford to atm anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom