Soldato
If a smart meter has stopped transmitting readings is there anything I can do to fix it?
Reported to Eon weeks ago but no update..
Blame the lefties and the EU would be your normal reaction surely
If a smart meter has stopped transmitting readings is there anything I can do to fix it?
Reported to Eon weeks ago but no update..
If a smart meter has stopped transmitting readings is there anything I can do to fix it?
Reported to Eon weeks ago but no update..
Blame the lefties and the EU would be your normal reaction surely
for the roll out of poor quality smart meters? yep you are probably right..
Would have to ask National Grid as their silly system. Pretty much all my heavy daily load use is after 7.30pm and normally as late as 9.30pm so I am never in a window to load shift anyways and pretty much never use peak so to date I have earnt £0.61 over the seven sessions calculated so far and 1 session left to be calculated.If you shift usage into the -4h to -1h timeframe before the session, it helps pay you back more in the session.
Example: If session is 16:00 - 17:00, then using more electric between 12:00 - 15:00 and then LESS electric in the session 16:00 - 17:00 will boost your earnings.
The hour before the sessions seems to be a dead zone doesn't count for anything.
I don't know why they calc it this way as it's open to abuse.
This is the issue with the system, the savings are huge on a national level but the incentive is tiny on an individual one. I guess the question is how people are better incentivised to take part or, flipping it on its head, whether people are penalised for not taking part. Unfortunately it's proven repeatedly over time that the only way to change behaviour is by inconveniencing people.For £1 is not even worth my time signing up.
Penalising is awful idea though. I am already only using between 1.3kWh to 3kWh a day depending if I am in or not. Why should I get penalised when I am already minimising the usage? How does that work for those with babies that need warmed milk or similar when they need it and thus might have to use the power during these penalised periods etc. What about those whom are heavy user due to home medical equipment that are already struggling.This is the issue with the system, the savings are huge on a national level but the incentive is tiny on an individual one. I guess the question is how people are better incentivised to take part or, flipping it on its head, whether people are penalised for not taking part. Unfortunately it's proven repeatedly over time that the only way to change behaviour is by inconveniencing people.
Penalising is awful idea though. I am already only using between 1.3kWh to 3kWh a day depending if I am in or not. Why should I get penalised when I am already minimising the usage? How does that work for those with babies that need warmed milk or similar when they need it and thus might have to use the power during these penalised periods etc. What about those whom are heavy user due to home medical equipment that are already struggling.
Aye I have no problem. I wasn't expecting anything. I am just confused why someone would suggest the way to possibly go is to penalise people instead. How would it work. I just wanted to see some more thought about it. Such as if you went that wayYou're using basically nothing so there isn't anything for you to really save on, these kinds of things will definitely benefit heavier users more, or those who can probably load shift.
For £1 is not even worth my time
Penalising is awful idea though. I am already only using between 1.3kWh to 3kWh a day depending if I am in or not. Why should I get penalised when I am already minimising the usage? How does that work for those with babies that need warmed milk or similar when they need it and thus might have to use the power during these penalised periods etc. What about those whom are heavy user due to home medical equipment that are already struggling.
Aye I have no problem. I wasn't expecting anything. I am just confused why someone would suggest the way to possibly go is to penalise people instead. How would it work. I just wanted to see some more thought about it. Such as if you went that way
That sort of thing. But it huge amount of admin work and to make sure it is not abused so then is it worth the cost relative.
- Base daily usage allowance to be agreed 5kWh a day or something
- Medical exemption for those that use medical equipment at home, be that a general blanket exemption or it needs further assement where medical equipment gets an allowance on top of daily
- Those with children under 4yrs (preschool) get a higher daily allowance of say 10kWh
- Work From Home have 10kWh allowance for days accordingly.
No I am not. I am well aware of the different costs and time zones. But that is my point.Its really flawed.
Your making the assumption that the costs are similar to generate the electricity in the whole 24 hour period when thats very much not true
No I am not. I am well aware of the different costs and time zones. But that is my point.
However as you noted above we are already penalised as it is aggragate cost over the total 24hr period. Now penalising being discussed was in terms of during these reduction aim periods those that do not manage to do so should be penalised thus something such as the charge for use of electric charged in that time period should cost more.
However if you are already using minimum at that time period why should my usage be penalised when it can't be load shifted as I have already done so in my daily life. How do you account for those that litereally can't load shift such as examples above with WFH, Children, medical requirements. Why should they be penalised for something that they have zero control over beyond the fact that unfortunatly the fairest system is to indeed aggragate the cost of production of power over a 24hr use.