So EON have said if you are on a fixed deal they will just adjust the prices to match the new cap and leave you on the tariff so no exit fee's.
Presumably if you are fixed under the cap then no change.
Others in this thread have put it around those figures, not sure if the standing charge is going up though. Will have to wait and see what the details are as just guess work at the min.
So EON have said if you are on a fixed deal they will just adjust the prices to match the new cap and leave you on the tariff so no exit fee's.
Presumably if you are fixed under the cap then no change.
I think the idea is that the 400 grant through the winter sees us pretty much thereOh crap, I thought we were already at the "2.5k" cap, and we would see no future rises for a while. Gonna be a chilly winter.
£2500 cap now confirmed and for 2 years, with no additional help for the vulnerable.
It feels like they did what they felt was needed for middle to high earners only as that is going to be way too high for those around living wage and also the unemployed.
Octopus boss said we now all need to wait for the suppliers to know the finer details so unknown if only SVR will be capped or they going to do something for all tariffs.
No they will leave you on NextOnline V19 but adjust the prices in line with the cap.So if I signed up to NextOnline V19 not long ago (due to start October 6th), like several of us on here did, EON will automatically just put us onto a fixed tariff at the capped rate or will it be an SVR tariff but at the capped rate?
Are they? I haven't seen that confirmed except for pensions.Benefits are also rising in line with inflation so I'm afraid I don't agree with your sentiment
From what I have seen online so far it seems like a very good plan which I am very happy with, paying £2.5k per year is much better than paying £4k, £5k or more for a typical household. Couldn't really ask for anything better.
It's ok we will get bumper pay rises now for a few years so it's all golden, right?It’s not. They could have done what Europe are doing and bring in a windfall tax and get those that are making the money, the energy producers, pay for it.
Instead we are going to be paying for these loans for years and years and have artificially high bills for a very long time.
They could have taxed the producers more and given us a cap without charging us for it. But no, business profits must be protected..
Well I was talking about next year, but anyway it turns out a document from the secretary of state for business was given to Martin Lewis, and an extract in a tweet showed that the £400 payments might be an annual thing, as well as the means tested COL payments. Not confirmed but if that happens I think thats reasonable, my concern was for 2023 mostly.But if the Cap is £2500, the most vulnerable will get £1,200 making their cap effectively £1,300
Not far from where the cap was before this all started...
Benefits are also rising in line with inflation so I'm afraid I don't agree with your sentiment
Fair point, I hadn't considered that.Also the same document explains why they went with £2500 cap with £400 instead of £2100 cap, it explains, it was to compensate lighter users with the £400 been a flat amount it means a bigger proportion to lighter users, thats well thought out and kudos to them for that.
Its possible I think given the rumours, Martin has posted some confusing tweets, I think the most likely thing is though the tariffs will be brought down to SVR level, One of the suppliers did a table stating if your fix is below the £2500 there will be no change, so I be surprised if the floor is below the £2500 unit rates for the subsidy.Has anyone done the maths on "fixed" deals and the new caps?
Unless I mis-read it, if you get onto a fixed deal before the new government cap, it will be retrospectively applied downwards so going for a more expensive fix now, could see it being cheaper after the cap is applied?
It’s not. They could have done what Europe are doing and bring in a windfall tax and get those that are making the money, the energy producers, pay for it.
Instead we are going to be paying for these loans for years and years and have artificially high bills for a very long time.
They could have taxed the producers more and given us a cap without charging us for it. But no, business profits must be protected..
as puzzled said standing charge wasn't planned to be increasing in October, so it is the unit price increase that will take the total up to 2.5K
Hang on...
Is the maths right? 60 million people in the UK, £2.85 billion to renationalise...
Pay £3000 in fuel costs this winter or £50 per person to renationalise UK energy?
Hmmmm, what to do.... what to do....