England v Pakistan **spoilers**

Mad old tory said:
Surely the time of release is irrelevant though, even if you properly chuck the ball, your arm is likely to be straight when you release it :)
Click to expand...

That was said wrong, when the arm is holding up at 180degs then it is still with the limits of the 15 degs, if people are whining about it so much why dont they take on the action themselves?
 
bellvc9.jpg


Cheating are we? this was bleeding given out!!!! :eek:

Yousuf was on 70 odd :mad:
 
Isn't that pic of Bell from the same series as Afridi's pitch dancing?
There were definitely one or two balls from Shoaib yesterday that looked a bit iffy to be honest. It's a shame Darrel Hair wasn't umpiring, he'd have called him straight away;)
 
JohnnyG said:
Isn't that pic of Bell from the same series as Afridi's pitch dancing?
There were definitely one or two balls from Shoaib yesterday that looked a bit iffy to be honest. It's a shame Darrel Hair wasn't umpiring, he'd have called him straight away;)
Click to expand...

well umpires didnt have a problem, so it was fine :rolleyes:

yesterday Pakistan played superbly with the ball and the bat
cant say the same for the fielding.

cant wait for Saturdays match :)

shows how much they missed the main bowlers in the test series.
 
JohnnyG said:
Isn't that pic of Bell from the same series as Afridi's pitch dancing?
There were definitely one or two balls from Shoaib yesterday that looked a bit iffy to be honest. It's a shame Darrel Hair wasn't umpiring, he'd have called him straight away;)
Click to expand...

They pratically all look the same ...... :D
 
PindiExpress said:
Yea and when icc had a look it was perfectly fine, the hyperextension makes it look like hes throwing it when he really isnt
Click to expand...

I still say he chucks one now and then, regardless of what the ICC say. Don't forget, that test is in a controlled environment etc. It doesn't mean that every single delivery he bowls will be legit...
 
Mad old tory said:
I still say he chucks one now and then, regardless of what the ICC say. Don't forget, that test is in a controlled environment etc. It doesn't mean that every single delivery he bowls will be legit...
Click to expand...

Oh my if you know more than the icc than why on earth arnt you managing the whole icc? Obviously you know what your talking about, ill email them a reccomendation :rolleyes:
 
Mad old tory said:
I still say he chucks one now and then, regardless of what the ICC say. Don't forget, that test is in a controlled environment etc. It doesn't mean that every single delivery he bowls will be legit...
Click to expand...


Hmmm you could say the same about most if not all the fast bowlers in the world including the English ones as well ;)...just no one pays much attention to them:p.
 
Spawn said:
Hmmm you could say the same about most if not all the fast bowlers in the world including the English ones as well ;)...just no one pays much attention to them:p.
Click to expand...
Thats because those bowlers bowl in a more accepted way. If you utilise a strange method and are a chucker as well you should expect to be investigated and to have attention called to it.
 
Gilly said:
Thats because those bowlers bowl in a more accepted way. If you utilise a strange method and are a chucker as well you should expect to be investigated and to have attention called to it.
Click to expand...

PMSL so what is a more accepted way then??. In case you forgot the ICC allow a +/- 15 degree leeway in a bowlers action;).
So please do educate me as to what is the more accepted way??
 
Spawn said:
PMSL so what is a more accepted way then??. In case you forgot the ICC allow a +/- 15 degree leeway in a bowlers action;).
So please do educate me as to what is the more accepted way??
Click to expand...

that leeway was only added to the rules to avoid confrontation ( as the ICC like to do )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom