Permabanned
Ive seen that most non Pakistani supporters are just jealous of not being able to have such a fast bowler in their teamt
Which 'most non Pakistani supporters' are you talking about?PindiExpress said:Ive seen that most non Pakistani supporters are just jealous of not being able to have such a fast bowler in their teamt
PindiExpress said:Oh my if you know more than the icc than why on earth arnt you managing the whole icc? Obviously you know what your talking about, ill email them a reccomendation
JohnnyG said:Which 'most non Pakistani supporters' are you talking about?
England have Harmison & Flintoff
Australia have Lee & McGrath
South Africa have Ntini & Pollock
New Zealand have Bond
West Indies have Edwards
India have Khan & Pathan
Can't remember any of the other nations supporters ever posting in here, unless you mean you talk to them in the real world, if you ever go there.
Mad old tory said:Think about it this way, if a bowler bowls 99% of his deliveries with an action which is perfectly fine, then get's no balled for chucking one delivery every now and then there shouldnt be a problem. That's what happens with the front foot rule, it should be the same with suspect actions, if the umpire think's the bowler has chucked it then he should be called. Doesn't mean he always chucks it, just that that individual delivery should be noballed.
Maybe they're right then. He had to remodel his action before, maybe it's gone back to the good old days. He has a suspect looking action with certain deliveries, that's a fact, otherwise people wouldn't go on about it would theyPindiExpress said:Have a look at all the arguments on youtube, pratically everyone who is not a pakistan fan says hes a chucker, a higher % of them are english and indians
SO iff he remoddeled his action to a legal one then *** is the problem?JohnnyG said:Maybe they're right then. He had to remodel his action before, maybe it's gone back to the good old days. He has a suspect looking action with certain deliveries, that's a fact, otherwise people wouldn't go on about it would they
Did you bother to read the thread at all?Spawn said:PMSL so what is a more accepted way then??. In case you forgot the ICC allow a +/- 15 degree leeway in a bowlers action.
e36Adz said:His bowling action definately does look suspect, but iv always thought thats due to his arm being abit 'bent' when extended, shows it here actually...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ1OcUxalwg&NR
I suppose if the ICC has cleared his action then all is good, but yeah I can understand people saying it looks dodgy at times, because it clearly does. I hope he stays fit for all the remaining games, we really need to win this series.
Gilly said:Did you bother to read the thread at all?
If you read the thread how did you miss the fact I said exactly what you did on the same damn page?Spawn said:Yes i did and i know what the accepted way of bowling is, i asked you if you knew yourself but seems like you dont....which is fair enough .