English League Football ** spoilers ** [30th October - 2nd November 2010]

Back at you

What handball are you refering to? None was given, game was never stopped therefore Nani or any other player was free to play.

So why did the referee miss it, but the linesman pick it up , and overule it.

Admit this - These crap decisions have to be erradicated.


If City Finish above Utd, because of poor refereeing in a derby game, then that would be outrageous.
 
Last edited:
Ehh, What

Okay, the referee missed the handball. Did he signal for a freekick? So why can Gomez get no blame here?

Then the implication is that the ref missed the handball. How do you know?


Just wish In high profile games

Officials could refer to Video evidence - (at least for goal decisons)

These decisions in a season make a difference

I bet the goal would still stand.
 
Last edited:
Linesman never flagged a handball. He put his flag up after the goal was scored for what looked like an offside gesture(?).

Only bad decision in this situation was that the penalty wasn't given, nani was clearly pulled. And the strange linesman flag.
 
Okay, the referee missed the handball. Did he signal for a freekick? So why can Gomez get no blame here?

Then the implication is that he missed the handball. How do you know?




I bet the goal would still stand.

Because the referee over ruled the linesman and awarded the goal.

the linesman saw the infringement (Ok late) - the referee ignored it.

We all see it in replays at home - tough ****

Clattenburg is a top referee
 
Because the referee over ruled the linesman and awarded the goal.

the linesman saw the infringement (Ok late) - the referee ignored it.

We all see it in replays at home - tough ****

Clattenburg is a top referee

What was the linesman even flagging for? No one knows.

Did he flag for the original infringement? If not, then why can he in hindsight? Clearly he in this scenario has allowed an advantage to be played.
 
What was the linesman even flagging for? No one knows.

Did he flag for the original infringement? If not, then why can he in hindsight? Clearly he in this scenario has allowed an advantage to be played.

Imagine a champions league final goal like this?
 
The penalty wasn't undeniable!! Seriously, what is enough to earn a penalty is opinion based. The handball was beyond any reasonable opinion.

I'm not denying Gomes made a bad mistake but it was obvious that Nani handballed it - especially bearing in mind that the penalty had already not been given... The penalty is therefore completely irrelevant.

And I don't support Spurs at all... I just find ridiculious things like this ridiculous

YOu can't just make the penalty completely irrelevant because it SUITS YOUR ARGUMENT.

You're saying, ooo Nani is the only one that was unsportsman like, because if you ignore one situation of Gomez/Kaboul being unsportsman like then Nani's the devil.

ITs ridiculous, as for whats a penalty, no, its NOT opinion. THere were TWO pullbacks, one on the arm, one he very clearly, very very very clearly tugged his shirt. That IS a penalty offence, the opinion is down to if the ref should have given it or not, the fact is the offence took place no matter if the ref gives it or not.

In shockingly the same way Nani grabbed the ball, but the ref didn't give it, please explain to me, penalty offence happened, theres video proof its completely undeniable, there is NO opinion on this, read the rules, the shirt was without question pulled, the player doesn't need to go down, or do a dance, or pass a test or do anything, that was an offence. It wasn't given, Kaboul, Gomez, everyone else except Nani played on.

Nani handled the ball, it was an offence, look in the rules, its clear as day, it wasn't given, everyone else but Gomez played on.

Now explain why you picked on Nani saying his unsportsman like specifically, the acts were identical, the offences without question, the rules are completely clear on whats a foul, the ref didn't give either, you can have an opinion on if he was right or wrong, on if Nani's a over dramatic diving ****, I don't think theres any opinion there either, I think all football fans alike think he is.

As for the linesman, everyones saying he waved the flag for the handball, or this, or that, or offside, simple fact is having not heard the conversation we have NO IDEA what the linesman was flagging for, he could be saying its a penalty, a handball, an offside or merely asking the ref to come and talk to him, who knows.
 
On another subject, Ronaldo is now at 12 goals in 9 games I believe, and just missed a very good chance to make it 13 goals. Not sure if he gets an assist aswell, someone was complaining HE only scores so much as he never stops shooting, 1-0 down, struggling to break through it was a wicked shot that swerved like a mofo from outside the box from Ronaldo that the keeper couldn't handle and Di Maria very neatly put the loose ball in the back of the net.

Do they count those as assists these days or not?

He's in ridiculous form.

Edit;- it was a different subject when I was typing it :p

Whats even more ridiculous is, he started off the season quite slow in scoring/assisting as the new players were pretty goal shy in the first 3-4 games.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom