Damn. Intel is killing it right now.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Entry level Alder Lake: i5-12400 review, the new value king
- Thread starter Grim5
- Start date
Damn. Intel is killing it right now.
Are you?
Yeah. 150 watt is 45 watts more than 105 watts. That’s the heat load placed on the cooling element to dissipate.
The T parts are potentially looking really promising. 12700T at 35watt and H670 should offer some very impressive performance per watt figures.
Watts vs Watts. You can’t get anymore Apple to Apples. PMSL.
]
Looks like Intel is already doing well without the T parts:
But the performance isn’t good? If you are looking for very high performance per watt?
Watts *actually used* vs watts listed in a TDP number are two different things.
I knew you would walk into this. You are the nw Baghdad Bob of tech. It's like you are greaving AMD's loss of the performance crown and stuck in the denial phase.
The chip in the review was measured at 151 watts. Not TDP. Actual Watts. Lol
That's nice. All Intel and AMD CPU's pull higher wattage measurements than their rated TDP.
Again TDP is not the same as actual power draw.
I knew you would walk into this. You are the nw Baghdad Bob of tech:
Yeah, around 11600 performance. And?
"And" better prformance than the 5600X.
Again, 150 watts is 45 watts more than 105 watts.
Great. You can do math with two unrelated numbers.
TDP and actual power draw are two different numbers. You know this, but I suspect you really just need to distract from direct comparisons of performance here, and thus persevere.
If performance per watt is the goal 12700T is looking like the chip to go for. It should offer very highend performance and very low power draw at default.
151 watts is what the part pulled. You need a cooler that can at least dissipate that. If that’s on the moon inside or out, it’s still 151 watts.
Hope that clears up any confusion.
And AMD's parts pull more than their TDP too.
Heck, the wraith cooler from my "105w" 3800X was unable to cool my "105w" 5800X. TDP is NOT power draw.
I hope this clears up any confusion.