Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
I had several of those batman games already but both me and my son got them anyway. Epic rocks.
And yet this chagrin is mostly saved for when Epic do it.We don't really know what the long-term impact of having top-rated games given away for free is yet. Could it further devalue new titles if there's a hint it'd be free at some point?
Or perhaps it won't have any impact whatsoever. We just don't know.
And yet this chagrin is mostly saved for when Epic do it.
Steam, humble bundle, windows store, GOG, GMG have ALL done such offers in the past (and others too I assume), they just have not done it with as many titles as epic.
Not aimed at any 1 person btw but the thing which grinds my gears most on stuff tends to be double standards, and there seem to be a lot of those flying around every single thing epic do.
(btw i am no Epic apologist either.... If we are gonna talk hypocrisy and double standards Tim Sweeney is right up there with the best of them).
Its funny because steam already did games for great prices and now theres serious competition we could see games becoming affordable on a whole new level
Its funny because steam already did games for great prices and now theres serious competition we could see games becoming affordable on a whole new level
I do feel that Steam need to do something to address their pricing. Its a common held thought that the Steam sales have gotten worse, with less savings over the years. They need to react to the changing PC price markets more.
if anything, Steam are putting prices up. Some of the games on my wish list have been there for years waiting for the price to drop to my chosen level but it isn’t happening.
From what I can tell the main reason people think the sales have gotten worse is that we've bought most of the games that we wanted... I can remember sales where I hoovered up 15 - 20 games for probably less than £5 each and was blown away by what great value it all seemed - a lot of those are still sat in my library now waiting to be played... many of the games I thought were a massive bargain at ~£10 when I bought them a few years back are equally sat unplayed and I see them come up in sales now for ~£3 and feel an idiot; but the point remains that there's only so much you can buy before the remaining games are all relatively new releases (which have never been afforded such deep discounts so early on)
Worth remembering also that a lot of Steam games aren't sold on Steam in the first place, a lot of mine in more recent years are from Humble or GMG or other places that seem able to do better deals
In some ways Steam have become the Marks and Spencer of game buying sites and we can simply get more for our buck from the Tescos/Lidl/Aldi/Morrisons etc of the gaming site world.
If I buy from CD keys, would I prefer a Steam Key? Yes
If it's cheaper on another platform, would I still want a Steam Key? No
Steam have been around for something like 15 years. It's reported to bring in revenue of $4 billion a year and rising.
I don't think Epic are going to become a monopoly.
If it was £1 extra on Steam, i'd probably get it on Steam.
Happy to **** off Origin and UPlayFunny to think how it was once the go to thing of slagging Steam, then Origin became the go to slagging train now it seems to be Epic.
Steam prices on new games are a bit OTT. I've got £30 worth of steam vouchers that i'm struggling to spend at the moment for instance.
I can put them towards DOOM: Eternal - But it's £49.99 on Steam.
I can buy a DOOM: Eternal CDkey for Steam, for less than £30 - So to buy it on Steam means I'm still having to shell out £20 of my own money and it feels like I'm wasting the vouchers.
Not a bad comparison really - some people just like M&S and are willing to pay a bit of a premium for the (albeit small) added convenience of using the posh shop they like to go to, maybe they make use of the pretty decent cafe that is there as well as picking up their shopping etc. but there's nothing at all wrong with people having the choice to shop at whichever store they choose to shop from... If Tesco suddenly strike a deal with the whole country's dairy industry so that no matter which shop you prefer to shop at, you'll also have to stop in at Tesco for your milk - that is not good for the consumer; it's annoying (even if it might be lucrative for the dairy farmers too, and even if Tesco charge less for milk than the other stores used to)
... and that's fair enough too but not quite that simple. If it's cheaper on another platform by a pitifully small amount like £1, and you don't currently have that platform for anything else, would you still want to bother? At what point does the saving outweigh any inconvenience? The answer is going to be different for everyone (and like the M&S shoppers in the analogy above they may be willing to pay even quite a bit extra for the convenience they want)...
Most people's issue is having the choice taken away from them, and the reasons for that should be obvious (can you really be sure that if Epic succeed and become the monopoly they desire that they will carry on offering great prices to the consumer forever? They certainly won't have to if you've got no other choice)
I do feel that Steam need to do something to address their pricing. Its a common held thought that the Steam sales have gotten worse, with less savings over the years. They need to react to the changing PC price markets more.