does that on Kimi's race suit mean "Schucompany"
Or is it still a terrible track that should die a lonely death?
20.2 Drivers must use the track at all times. For the avoidance of doubt the white lines defining the track edges are considered to be part of the track but the kerbs are not.
A driver will be judged to have left the track if no part of the car remains in contact with the track.
Should a car leave the track the driver may rejoin, however, this may only be done when it is safe to do so and without gaining any advantage.
hamilton is innocent? LOL
The FIA decided he was.
theres no way hamilton didnt know malonado was alongside
This for me shows that Hamilton purposely squeezed him out of track...
It doesn't Arknor is conviniently ignoring the pictures 2 seconds before. Here's a small hint, F1 cars don't stop in 5 metres, Maldonado is alongside as Hamilton has already started breaking BEFORE that first picture. Hamilton didn't crowd him out, look at the pictures look at the direction of the car in the first picture and the last, its a very tight corner, from the fastest/longest straight on the tract. Just because there is road to Hamilton's right IN NO WAY means he could actually be on it. When you turn the wheel to the right at X speed there is only so quickly you can turn, its that simple.
Arknor is saying Hamilton crowded him out because he could turn tighter than you know, physics allows. Again I'll point out that, Hamilton had gone tyres at this point, less grip and tighter turning = the back end going out. What would have happened to Maldonado through that corner if Hamilton went tighter than was sensible, what would happen to any drive, the back end goes out and the car stops turning as it loses control, what would have happened... Maldonado would have gotten smashed.
Hamilton had no grip Maldonado knew this before braking late to jump into a gap that wasn't there against a car struggling like hell for grip. No one in their right mind would jump to the outside of a guy with no grip taking a very tight corner.
SO Maldonado WASN'T there when Hamilton broke, and the second Hamilton(or any drive at ANY corner) picks a line and brakes they have commited to the corner, the speed they will take that corner, the LINE they will take that corner, now tight they will take that corner.
Maldonado had the choice to brake and follow, Hamilton DIDN'T, he was commited to the corner with no options left, except jam the brake, which would lock up, go straight on and smash Maldonado, or take the corner as safely as his line/speed would allow. Maldonado tried a late move on the outside of a corner with no space with a car that had no grip and had a HUGE chance of losing control, slipping, ending up very wide. Maldonado knew ALL of this before he tried the move.
Yeah, the constant threat of the coverage cutting to a massive plume of white smoke kept you on your toes. But then listening to Alan McNish talk about how Toyota in 2002 were going through 400 engines a year I can understand why more reliable engines are better for the sport.
Not through the corner where the incident took place.
The FIA decided he was.
Anyone saying Lewis did not squeeze the space for Pastor is just blind really, but as said it's long gone now and people should move on. Alonso make a move round the outside of Webber into turn 1, the difference was Webber respected it and gave him the room, Lewis never, simple really. Lewis was not on the racing line, he was wide, very wide.
Pastor could easily have just let Lewis take him out into the corner, Lewis was on the inside but moves into the braking zone to squeeze the space further, anyone can see that from the video's unless as said they are blind
Out of curiousity, which line would people say is the most natural into the corner? Lewis or Pastors?
After all people have been saying Lewis held the racing line, from that picture it looks to me that Pastor has the better line for the faster turn in and exit?
Not that I want to stir it up again but I found that sequence of shots interesting