Poll: Exit Poll: UK General Election 2017 - Results discussion and OcUK Exit Poll - Closing 8th July

Exit poll: Who did you vote for?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 302 27.5%
  • Labour

    Votes: 577 52.6%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 104 9.5%
  • Green

    Votes: 13 1.2%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 19 1.7%
  • Scottish National Party

    Votes: 30 2.7%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 6 0.5%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 4.2%

  • Total voters
    1,097
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does that include the post war governments that rebuilt the UK?

You mean the government that

armed the UK with nuclear weapons?

The government that pursued economic austerity to bring the deficit down into surplus...

'The UK deficit started out in 1947 at 3 percent of GDP and then immediately went into surplus, as the Attlee government worked to reduce the huge debt racked up in World War II.'

That considerably reduced total public spending in its term ....

Who supported the Act that made Grammar schools accessible to all who could pass the 11 plus

That accepted that even the with a much cheaper to finance NHS (less old people and less expensive advanced treatments available in the 1940's and 50's) that some payment was needed to pay for the system

'By 1950 costs were so high that the principle of free treatment had to be revised and prescriptions were introduced. Bevan resigned in protest.'

Health care cost rise from circa 1.42% to 7.27% of GDP 1945 -2017

That maintained high defence spending as a % of GDP

'In 1950 Britain spent 6.6 per cent of its GDP on defence: more than any major country except the Soviet Union'

That didn't allow strikes

'strikes were illegal until 1951'

That pursued very errr.. Capitalist policies to make sure there was a tax base to pay for the other policies they were brining in.....

'the government’s policy of prioritising export production for currency reasons.'

(This was at a time when the UK public had to endure food rationing and shortages of other goods)

Yes totally like JC and his Marxist chums.....

(for the record I'm in favour of a National Health System but do think we need an honest conversation about what services it should offer and how it should be paid for)
 
Last edited:
Newcastle under Lyme better be postponed, don't know how its legal to continue with an admin error.

the problem is further exacerbated due to it being a marginal. In the grand scheme of things it likely won't make any difference, but it will seriously undermine the confidence the electorate in that area will have in the electoral process and will likely dissuade people from bothering next time
 
You mean the government that

armed the UK with nuclear weapons?

The government that pursued economic austerity to bring the deficit down into surplus...

'The UK deficit started out in 1947 at 3 percent of GDP and then immediately went into surplus, as the Attlee government worked to reduce the huge debt racked up in World War II.'

That considerably reduced total public spending in its term ....

Who supported the Act that made Grammar schools accessible to all who could pass the 11 plus

That accepted that even the with a much cheaper to finance NHS (less old people and less expensive advance treatments available in the 1940's and 50's) that some payment was needed to pay for the system

'By 1950 costs were so high that the principle of free treatment had to be revised and prescriptions were introduced. Bevan resigned in protest.'

Health care cost rise from circa 1.5% to 7% of GDP 1945 -2017

That maintained high defence spending as a % of GDP

'In 1950 Britain spent 6.6 per cent of its GDP on defence: more than any major country except the Soviet Union'

Yes totally like JC and his Marxist chums.....

(for the record I'm in favour of a National Health System but do think we need an honest conversation about what services it should offer and how it should be paid for)


And that's the key difference, the current bunch of lunatics who have hijacked the party and turned it into the modern day communist party have no idea what labour stood for, should stand for and all the good things (all though not for a great many years) the party has done.

Heaven forbid Corbyn gets in, because we as a country will be royally ******.
 
Quite a nice programme on Bbc1 right now, waiting for Dimbleby, about a house they've built for some disabled children... no idea what it is :)
 
5 minutes
aXAVF4S.jpg
 
Yes poor old Jeremy, I am sure it's all lies.

Yes, I'm sure The Sun or Daily Mail have never deliberately taken things out of context or lied. At all. Such bastions of journalistic integrity.

I know several myself, don't know how you expect me to prove it? They give it to charity, you have heard of charity right?

Well, as you said 'lots' in your original post I thought you were privy to some national poll but turns out your evidence is anecdotal. Nothing wrong with that, but it's not an exhaustive study.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom