If you discount changes of ownership as well as rule changes, the only teams I can think of from the top of my head is Jordan around 98/99 and BAR in 2004.
Dunno, but I'm not suggesting anything like that is going to happen with Merc.
for a quote that aparently came from a generic foreign media a lot of reliable journalists are also mentioning itThis has not come from Newey, its come from a generic foreign media source apparently quoting him
maybe because mercedes is a huge brand and they have recruited a lot of big names?
as always you know best though......
Brawn was lucky in 2009.........we all know it.
they knew exactly what was wrong with their car last year aswell so will have found large amounts of performance fairly easily
This has not come from Newey, its come from a generic foreign media source apparently quoting him
lucky? lucky honda threw god knows how many hundreds of millions at the team? wasnt honda suposed to have been one of the biggest budget teams at the time and rumoured to be spending more than ferrari?
homologated chasis they couldntJust because they know what the problem(s) are , does not imply they can correct it simply (after all they had 8 months to correct it and they didnt)
Would be interesting to see their budgets over the last few seasons as well, are they online somewhere?
I can't see Mercedes having anything massively innovative. I'm talking 1 second or more a lap quicker than anyone else. That's the time when you might skip tests or sandbag etc.
i doubt testing is really that importaint this year seeing as the rule changes arent big ones.
There’s a lot of work to do to fine tune the F2012 but, as both Fernando and I said last week, I think this car has plenty of potential. It will be important to do a lot of kilometres next week, because we have many ideas we want to try out and it’s essential we don’t have any problems
Ferrari seem to think it's important.
http://www.ferrari.com/English/Form...7_F1_Two-days-in-the-simulator-for-Massa.aspx