Fake hate crime: Jussie Smollett paid two Nigerian brothers to attack him

How’s that Trump Russia conspiracy going that you were so sure was true? Constantly quoting fake news sources to ridicule me and others with, saying how we were ‘proven false’, conspiracy therorists and generally told us were were idiots, and you still have the nerve to keep calling us the conspiracists

Edit: Just reminding myself how wrong you’ve been last 2 years by going through your post history, hilarious how you believed everything you read :D:D:D

Everything you have said here is demonstrably false, and palpably ironic.

Irony-Meter.gif


It's getting murkier and murkier. The original deal was that it was technically called a plea and that forfeiting the $10k bond plus the community service added to punishment already served. But because Smollet still publically denied everything the SA office renamed it to case dropped.

The Chicago police are now furious as they had a vast amount of evidence which went wider than Smollet which they wanted to produce in court. The state attorney's decision has effectively gagged it meaning it now cannot be released.

I don’t understand, did he do it or not? I was trying to follow it but it all seems to have disappeared into a spaghetti mess?

Smollett is undoubtedly guilty. Looks like his lawyers have cut a clever plea deal for him. In the USA, you can buy the amount of justice you'd prefer to receive (while burying the true facts beneath a mountain of technicalities). That's clearly been the case in this situation.
 
I don’t understand, did he do it or not? I was trying to follow it but it all seems to have disappeared into a spaghetti mess?

It certainly looks like he did do it. However they seem to effectively be letting him off because he's paid some cash for something and done some volunteer work or something.
 
It certainly looks like he did do it. However they seem to effectively be letting him off because he's paid some cash for something and done some volunteer work or something.

More likely because he has connections with a former Democratic president, with a current Democratic president hopeful (Kamala Harris) and because his fake lynching stunt was amazingly coincidentally well-timed for Harris's flagship anti-lynching bill she was pushing. We'll also add that the Chicago council is 48 out of 50 Democrats (plus one independent former Democrat) and the Attorney General Kimm Foxx is a Progressive who shares the same financial backers as the Democrats (various Progressive groups, George Soros, et al). Basically, they're locking down on something that would be a major embarrassment for their faction. Plus the simple fact that so much Left Wing political capital is made out of presenting themselves as the party for African Americans and out of identity politics which Jussie's hoax is a very real blow to. The relinquishing of his $10,000 bond (you would expect to get that back if you were not convicted. So it's now effectively a bribe) is a part of that but honestly, a side-show. Just as the pretense that he staged the hoax just to negotiate a higher salary when clearly he was motivated politically as a hugely vocal critic of Trump and the Republicans.

Incidentally, Jussie's original lawyer has been named as co-defendent in the charges against Avenatti's over the latter's massive extortion attempt. Avenatti of course having represented (badly) Stormy Danials amidst other dubious cases.

EDIT: And just for interest, here's a picture of the Chicago Attorny General Kimm Fox who says she recused herself from the case (lol!)
Shared-Screenshot.jpg


Yes, that is indeed Democrat presidential hopeful and Jussie's friend Kamala Khan she's pictured with.
 
Last edited:
I am willing to go as far as he utilised some sort of rich person justice, Democratic support however? This move makes the police looks like chumps and the city, plus he's small fish regardless of his connections.

However the likes of Epstein, now that is looking like a real example of political movers and shakers making sure a billionaire gets the least amount of punishment for trafficking underage kids.

Edit - why would he agree to do community service and pay $10k if he's innocent lol?
 
Apparently the DA didn't recuse herself (properly) after all..... Because if she had she would have to have appointed a special counsel..

State law states that after a state's attorney recuses herself on a case "the court shall appoint a special prosecutor."

That didn't happen in the Smollett case. Instead, Foxx tapped her first assistant, veteran prosecutor Joseph Magats, to take over.

Magats described the police investigation as "outstanding" and told the Tribune the fact the case was "disposed of alternatively" is not evidence that it was flawed in any way. But his predecessor told the paper he had never before seen charges dropped so quickly after an indictment.

"You could make the argument that if the state's attorney has a conflict, her whole office has a conflict," a former prosecutor who asked not to be named said. "I don't know if that's the case. But this sure seems odd."

Determining if Foxx violated state law could be a political trick bag.

Foxx has strong ties to the state's top prosecutor charged with investigating elected officials accused of violating state law, rookie Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul. Foxx, the political protégé of Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, served on Raoul's transition team after the 2018 election.

Raoul spokeswoman Vanessa James declined to comment Tuesday.

Update: Cook County State's Attorney spokeswoman Kiera Ellis said in a statement that Fox "did not formally recuse herself or the [State's Attorney] Office based on any actual conflict of interest. As a result, she did not have to seek the appointment of a special prosecutor."

When Fox publicly announced that she had recused herself "it was a colloquial use of the term rather than in its legal sense," Ellis said.

"Instead, in an abundance of caution, Fox informally separated herself from the decision-making over the case and left it to her Assistants, as happens in 99.9% of all cases handled by the Office."

Magats, Foxx's first assistant didn't tell Fox about the deal to drop charges against Smollett in advance of the hearing, Ellis said.

Magats did inform Ellis and police Supt. Eddie Johnson before the court hearing, according to Ellis.

"They weren't happy about it but here we are," Ellis said. "We're not trying this in the court of public opinion. The decision was made to handle this like any Class 4 felony against someone without any prior convictions."

In the last two years, the state's attorney's office referred more than 5,700 cases for alternative prosecution.

Foxx's office released this statement: "This is not a new or unusual practice. An alternative disposition does not mean that there were any problems or infirmities with the case or the evidence. We stand behind the Chicago Police Department's investigation and our decision to approve charges in this case. We did not exonerate Mr. Smollett. The charges were dropped in return for Mr. Smollett's agreement to do community service and forfeit his $10,000 bond to the City of Chicago. Without the completion of these terms, the charges would not have been dropped. This outcome was met under the same criteria that would occur for and is available to any defendant with similar circumstances."
 
What a mess.

No one involved in the investigation has expressed any doubt that he was guilty, but no charges. I feel that more than that $10,000 exchanged hands.

Given the ridiculous sentences you often read about in the US there will be a great many people very angry about this.
 
And lets not forget civil asset forfeiture which gives the likes of the police a pass to essentially rob anyone, with only a sniffle of suspicion (it gets abused no doubt).

There is a complete separation between the rich/powerful/state and everyone else, it's sinking back into the middle ages.
 
(from the quoted report) "They weren't happy about it but here we are," Ellis said. "We're not trying this in the court of public opinion. The decision was made to handle this like any Class 4 felony against someone without any prior convictions."

This is odd. He HAS prior convictions does he not? Some time back he attempted to evade a drink driving conviction by pretending to be his own brother (who would then have had the DUI put on him). I vaguely recall there was something else he did as well.


I am willing to go as far as he utilised some sort of rich person justice, Democratic support however? This move makes the police looks like chumps and the city, plus he's small fish regardless of his connections.

It may seem far-fetched due to lack of familiarity with such behaviour by these parties. If you're not then I can imagine someone you don't know saying "Democrat leadership have influenced it" could sound like a Conspiracy Theory? But it is a conspiracy theory by definition and there's plenty of reason to suppose it's true. Throughout history the politically powerful have pulled strings for the friends and allies. Not only is Jussie Smollet a friend of very powerful Democrat leaders (proven), but so is his sister. And the concordance of his fake lynching with what two Democrat leaders were trying to make a lot of political capital out of isn't to be underestimated. It seems to be the case that Michelle Obama's chief of staff was calling the Chicago Attorney General about the matter personally if the latest information to come out gets confirmed.

Chicago is notoriously corrupt. It's Obama's old political haunting ground before he became president, as well.

However the likes of Epstein, now that is looking like a real example of political movers and shakers making sure a billionaire gets the least amount of punishment for trafficking underage kids.

Epstein is scum of the worst kind. I'm not sure why bringing up another example of people with high-up political connections getting let off their crimes should weaken the case for the same thing happening with Smollet. Bill Clinton travelled on Epstein's private jet (called the "Lolita Express") on multiple occasions. Even dismissing his Secret Service guards when doing so. These are documented facts. Prince Andrew was also a guest of Epstein's on the jet and private island. Prince Andrew has been suggested as one of the candidates for the unknown redacted figure from one of the investigations. If they can get a multiple child molester off with a slap on the wrist, I'm pretty sure they feel they can clear up a public disorder felony for close family friends. Never mind that if he'd been smart enough to pull this off he could have started race riots through the city.

Edit - why would he agree to do community service and pay $10k if he's innocent lol?

Well precisely. You might also wonder why Smollet isn't still wanting to find the people who attacked him...
 
Last edited:
And lets not forget civil asset forfeiture which gives the likes of the police a pass to essentially rob anyone, with only a sniffle of suspicion (it gets abused no doubt).

There is a complete separation between the rich/powerful/state and everyone else, it's sinking back into the middle ages.

The Supreme Court of the USA ruled against Civil Forfeiture last month. Now that all the deadlock in the SC has been somewhat resolved since Kavenaugh's appointment went through, things are moving again. It wont necessarily change forfeiture laws completely at the State Level but it's a start.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-6073.ZS.html
 
Because Epstein was a very well connected billionaire, likely protecting others of his kind with his kiddy fiddling. Jussie is an up and coming actor in a TV show and is essentially nobody compared to Epstein. I'm not saying it couldn't happen, I just don't know why any would would use some of their finite clout to save him.

The Supreme Court of the USA ruled against Civil Forfeiture last month. Now that all the deadlock in the SC has been somewhat resolved since Kavenaugh's appointment went through, things are moving again. It wont necessarily change forfeiture laws completely at the State Level but it's a start.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-6073.ZS.html

Welcome news but sounds like the war is far from over yet.
 
Last edited:
Smollett will be murdered by an extreme right-winger who is outraged by this decision. Democratic party will come out on top.

Smoke and mirrors.
 
She didn’t actually recuse herself, or at least because she didn’t follow procedure she’s retrospectively claimed that she essentially used the term as a figure of speech and didn’t mean it officially.
 
She didn’t actually recuse herself, or at least because she didn’t follow procedure she’s retrospectively claimed that she essentially used the term as a figure of speech and didn’t mean it officially.

Indeed. She lied. Then she realised that she was caught out and concluded that admitting she lied to the public ('actually I never recused myself') doesn't have actual legal consequences but lying in a legal statement does. So the waveform duality collapses into a single state of the thing she said to the public being the one that is incorrect.

In addition:
Shared-Screenshot.jpg


She's backtracking on anything that could bite her now. As a commentator on Twitter wrote: "she didn't realise this was politics on a world stage, rather than just business as usual".

It's rumoured that an email has gone round internally asking people to find other cases of people being let off in the same way as Jussie. The leaked (and unverified) email emphasises "nobody is in any trouble". Which can be read as ordinarily we'd tell you what you did was wrong but we did it too and now we need to find where you did it as well to prove it's "normal".
 
Further statement from the State Bar association on the handling of the Jussie Smollet case. TL;DR: This stinks to high heaven.


(clickable link).

Also, the Chicago Police Department is staging a protest. The Chicago police probably have a pretty good idea of the chaos that would have been unleashed if Smollet had pulled off the hoax successfully.
Shared-Screenshot.jpg
 
I notice that the police have just sent him the bill for wasting their time, $130000. :D

That's about one week's work for Smollet but still, it's worth its weight in PR. What gets me in this is just how solid the police must feel their case is for things to have got this far, given how difficult it can be in the USA to secure a conviction against someone with expensive lawyers even when that person is guilty.
 
Back
Top Bottom