I think what he means is Vince the media is running defence because of his political leanings. See image above about left wing hoax.
Correct.
And what VincentHanna means is that if the chief of police says it, it can't possibly be something deliberately put out there and promulgated by the Left Wing and Democrat establishment. Because it's not as if the police chief is appointed by the Chicago City Council which, of it's 50 members consists of 48 Democrats, 1
ex-Democrat and a single Republican. It's not as the police chief works in a city that is heavily Democrat leaning. And (my preferred option over suggesting political bias in Chicago's police force), he'll be reporting what Jussie Smollett's lawyers tell him about his motives. He can't peer inside someone's head. It being about money, not politics, is unarguably better for the Left and the Democrats. Also note how Vince has immediately dis-guarded Jussie's long and outspoken anti-Trump rhetoric and political activism and the striking coincidence of this with his friend's "anti-lynching" bill. None of that matters as soon as Vince finds a possible reason to direct it elsewhere that he prefers to believe. Which nicely illustrates my point, I feel.
Kamala Harris is another ideologue who is worrisome.
I don't know a great deal about her though I did read her "anti-lynching" bill and it's one of the most transparent and pointless PR stunts I've ever seen. Basically just a step for her presidential candidacy campaign.
Given the lengths he goes to I strongly believe prison is the only option. This after a trial where all his actions are shown. On another note I think that maybe Mueller should also trawl his entire lifes history just to see if he has committed any other crimes in his life just in case we can nail him on that too
Now we all know that's not going to happen!