Poll: Fight: steven seagal v JCVD - Who do you think would win?

Who would win?

  • Steven Seagal

    Votes: 196 44.5%

  • JCVD

    Votes: 244 55.5%
  • Total voters
    440
meghatronic said:
:



I do, also, find it humorous (lol troll) how any videos or stories people post pro-Aikido are dismissed instantly. Yet an uncredited story about Lebell, and a Silva "marketer" are gospel.
Click to expand...

There are plenty about JCVD also:


http://www.thefreelibrary.com/NOT+W...EAN-CLAUDE+VAN+DAMME+LIED+ABOUT...-a083942200



Dux (pronounced ``duke'') claims he met Van Damme in 1986, when the actor was laying carpet in Los Angeles.

Dux contends that he trained Van Damme for ``Bloodsport,'' a video game-like film based on Dux's experience at the Kumite Kumite (組手) means sparring, and is one of the three main sections of karate training, along with kata and kihon. Kumite is the part of karate in which you train against an opponent, using the techniques learnt from the kihon and kata. (rhymes with ``Zuma Bay''), an underground fighting championship in the Bahamas.

The names weren't changed for ``Bloodsport'' - Van Damme's character is called Frank Dux - but behind the scenes, the real Dux said the actor's abilities were as a ballet dancer, not a karate champion.

``I asked Jean-Claude to do a simple forward roll, and he landed on his head,'' Dux said. ``He knows that he had no business doing those kind of fight scenes.''

Dux isn't the first man to question Van Damme's karate pedigree.

Two years after ``Bloodsport'' came out, World Karate Association President Howard Hanson said he only knew of one Van Damme fight - an amateur bout in Europe. Jim Baker, a writer for Black Belt magazine, once called the actor ``a complete fraud.'' .



It's all rubbish, Frank Dux was and is a joke, but it proves that the stories about Seagal are equally a load of tosh.
 
Castiel said:
Anyway, this whole who v who thing is pointless.....


Jackie Chan would kick 'em all to hell, in humorous fashion at that!
Click to expand...

Nah Chuck Norris and its not even close...

'Chuck Norris was the fourth Wiseman. He brought baby Jesus the gift of “beard”. Jesus wore it proudly to his dying day. The other Wisemen, jealous of Jesus’ obvious gift favoritism, used their combined influence to have Chuck omitted from the Bible. Shortly after all three died of roundhouse kick related deaths.'
 
dowie said:
well you just keep on believing and I'll remain a skeptic and stick to stuff that involves training against fully resisting opponents (from my arm chair)
Click to expand...
It could be hokum, but one of us has years of experience across the globe at it. One of us doesn't. I therefore value my opinion more than yours. This isn't egotism, for instance, I bow to your judgements on anything armchair related :D.
 
dowie said:
training against fully resisting opponents (from my arm chair)
Click to expand...

Bit rich coming from someone who is claiming others of holding blind faith when there are several posters in here who have first hand experience of competing in traditional martial arts against opponents who are 100% resisting.

Have you ever been to a proper martial arts competition? :confused:

Yet you call us all blinkered? :confused:
 
Cool - some homeopaths have years of experience at practicing homeopathy across the globe - I guess when it comes down to the fine details of homeopathy they really do know there stuff and they likely would value their own opinion more than mine.

Despite not having years of experience with homeopathy I'd still probably go along with evidence based medicine as being a bit better in general when it comes to treating patients.
 
dowie said:
Cool - some homeopaths have years of experience at practicing homeopathy across the globe - I guess when it comes down to the fine details of homeopathy they really do know there stuff and they likely would value their own opinion more than mine.

Despite not having years of experience with homeopathy I'd still probably go along with evidence based medicine as being a bit better in general when it comes to treating patients.
Click to expand...

So basically you're full of ****! You're more blinkered than any of the people you refer to (who actually admit that traditional martial arts aren't the be all and end all).

Why bother even posting if we're all so below your level of awesomeness?
 
sigma said:
Bit rich coming from someone who is claiming others of holding blind faith when there are several posters in here who have first hand experience of competing in traditional martial arts against opponents who are 100% resisting.

Have you ever been to a proper martial arts competition? :confused:

Yet you call us all blinkered? :confused:
Click to expand...

LOL another straw man....

Where have I criticised training against resisting opponents and where have I criticised traditional martial arts in general.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom