Permabanned
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 2,553
In oct-nov or at worst dec I'll be building a new system for the first time since a q6600... (ran macbook pros since for what I use and consoles)
This will ONLY be used for gaming...
5800x, 32gb 3600 lpx, rm850, msi mortar b550m wifi/bt, sammy 980pro 2tb pcie4.0 m.2, lg 32gp850-b...
IF the 4xxx series turns out to be overhyped and rip off pricing as seems to be always the case I'd like a backup option gpu wise...
Which would you go for out of a 6800xt 16gb vs a 3080 10 or 12gb (as currently ocuk have a 3080 12gb for £830 which is what i was budgetting for a 3080 10gb) I'm more than happy to pay the £200ish extra for a 12gb 3080...
My MAIN thing is I want this to last happily at 1440p for as many years as possible at a locked 60fps on SP games at the highest possible settings then when it can't take it bang on dlss...
MP games aren't really an issue but if I want to play them I will have a 180hz 1440p monitor so that's fine at whatever settings to maintain 180hz...
I keep seeing mixed opinions on how a 6800xt is so much better for the extra vram? but crap at RT (which would be nice at 60fps 1440p for a year or however long modern games will allow me to play it with nice eye candy on with or without dlss) people say in the future the AMD cards will stomp nvidia for RT etc due to infinity cache? But all I see is many games not supporting it currently and horrific fps differences from a 3080... I know the 6800XT is a lot cheaper if bought from ocuk for example but the £1-200 or so difference isn't a factor I WILL pay it IF the 3080 IS better?
So would the extra vram of the 6800XT allow me to go nuts and max everything out for years to come excluding RT or is it a marketing thing like the 10gb vs 12gb arguments I see? As I also see nonsense about how a 4xxx card will want a minimum of a 5800x3d or the cpu will be a bottleneck which seems mad as no games are using that many cores let alone for a few years yet, surely?
I'm not biased in anyway I like and have had both brands so it'd be interesting to see what people say as I'm lost currently, ha!
Thanks!
This will ONLY be used for gaming...
5800x, 32gb 3600 lpx, rm850, msi mortar b550m wifi/bt, sammy 980pro 2tb pcie4.0 m.2, lg 32gp850-b...
IF the 4xxx series turns out to be overhyped and rip off pricing as seems to be always the case I'd like a backup option gpu wise...
Which would you go for out of a 6800xt 16gb vs a 3080 10 or 12gb (as currently ocuk have a 3080 12gb for £830 which is what i was budgetting for a 3080 10gb) I'm more than happy to pay the £200ish extra for a 12gb 3080...
My MAIN thing is I want this to last happily at 1440p for as many years as possible at a locked 60fps on SP games at the highest possible settings then when it can't take it bang on dlss...
MP games aren't really an issue but if I want to play them I will have a 180hz 1440p monitor so that's fine at whatever settings to maintain 180hz...
I keep seeing mixed opinions on how a 6800xt is so much better for the extra vram? but crap at RT (which would be nice at 60fps 1440p for a year or however long modern games will allow me to play it with nice eye candy on with or without dlss) people say in the future the AMD cards will stomp nvidia for RT etc due to infinity cache? But all I see is many games not supporting it currently and horrific fps differences from a 3080... I know the 6800XT is a lot cheaper if bought from ocuk for example but the £1-200 or so difference isn't a factor I WILL pay it IF the 3080 IS better?
So would the extra vram of the 6800XT allow me to go nuts and max everything out for years to come excluding RT or is it a marketing thing like the 10gb vs 12gb arguments I see? As I also see nonsense about how a 4xxx card will want a minimum of a 5800x3d or the cpu will be a bottleneck which seems mad as no games are using that many cores let alone for a few years yet, surely?
I'm not biased in anyway I like and have had both brands so it'd be interesting to see what people say as I'm lost currently, ha!
Thanks!
Last edited: